User:Contribution/Successive superparticular complementary pair: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Consider this second version for naming: "Alpha 2/1, Beta 2/1, Gamma 2/1, Alpha 7/5." Consistency and Clarity: The second version ("Alpha 2/1, Beta 2/1, Gamma 2/1, Alpha 7/5") places the descriptive name ("Alpha," "Beta," "Gamma") before the ratio. This makes it clear that "Alpha," "Beta," "Gamma," and so on are categories or types, while "2/1" and "7/5" are specific tunings or ratios within those categories. This ordering helps maintain a logical structure that is easier to follow.}}
-{{todo|Add data|inline=1|comment=Include columns for the following optimizations: Pure Equave, Dave Benson, TE, POTE, and CTE. To prevent the table from becoming overcrowded, choose between using cents or EDO. Cents are preferable since these are EDONOI. Retain the EDO column for pure equaves to provide a sense of scale, but place it outside the optimization subgroup column. --- These are non-octave scales. Octave-based optimizations such as POTE, CTE or CTWE don't really make sense. However, TE is still relevant.}}
+{{todo|Add data|inline=1|comment=Include columns for the following optimizations: Pure Equave, Dave Benson, TE, POTE, and CTE. To prevent the table from becoming overcrowded, choose between using cents or EDO. Cents are preferable since these are EDONOI. Retain the EDO column for pure equaves to provide a sense of scale, but place it outside the optimization subgroup column.}}
 {| class="wikitable"