User:Dummy index/Chromatic pairs and how we define haplotonic: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 * Seni[5] and Sensi[8] both are labelled Category:Haplotonic scales. Only Sensi[8] is strong haplotonic, but Sensi[5] is shorter genchain, obviously more haplo than Sensi[8]. both haplotonic? mini-haplotonic and haplotonic? haplotonic and strong-haplotonic? Well, shouldn't both be haplotonic? Isn't it just that we want to differentiate it because we're trying to include it in the scale-list?
 ** If there are multiple haplotonic scale in condition 1 and 3, it may be nice to name most-notes scale (must be strong haplotonic!) "strong haplotonic" or "maximum haplotonic" or "the end of haplotonic".
-*** Baldy[5] and Baldy[6] both are strong haplotonic, so we need to use different terms to distinguish them.
+*** Baldy[5] and Baldy[6] both are strong haplotonic, so we need to use different terms to distinguish them. e.g. Baldy4/5/6 are haplotonic and Baldy6 is max-haplotonic. Until Baldy5 become listed, Baldy6 is simply called haplotonic.
 * Fractional-octave?
+* Are they undoubtedly haplotonic? neutral third 3L 4s, mavila 2L 5s, ...