BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Line 679: Line 679:
* '''Arbitrary numbers:''' It’s fine to explore the 2.3.5.101 [[subgroup]] if you want to. It doesn’t matter that it’s less [[concordant]] than 2.3.5.7. Explore it anyway and see what happens. Do some stuff with [[:Category:Novelties|arbitrary numbers]] that don’t make logical sense and just see what comes of it. That’s where the fun is! (Though do keep a “2.3” or “3.5” in there just to smooth over the gnarliest edges, heehee.)
* '''Arbitrary numbers:''' It’s fine to explore the 2.3.5.101 [[subgroup]] if you want to. It doesn’t matter that it’s less [[concordant]] than 2.3.5.7. Explore it anyway and see what happens. Do some stuff with [[:Category:Novelties|arbitrary numbers]] that don’t make logical sense and just see what comes of it. That’s where the fun is! (Though do keep a “2.3” or “3.5” in there just to smooth over the gnarliest edges, heehee.)
* '''Importance of common names:''' I would prefer to use a temperament [[Temperament naming|named]] something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “countertrihexakleismatic” even if it’s super [[damage|accurate]] and [[badness|technically better]] - a bland name can kill a temperament’s appeal, a fun name can create appeal out of nothing.
* '''Importance of common names:''' I would prefer to use a temperament [[Temperament naming|named]] something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “countertrihexakleismatic” even if it’s super [[damage|accurate]] and [[badness|technically better]] - a bland name can kill a temperament’s appeal, a fun name can create appeal out of nothing.
* '''Misrepresentation of traditions:''' A cheeky little opinion piece I wrote criticising the negative and celebrating the positive ways Western tuning theory has borrowed from the world’s traditions: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]]
* '''Misrepresentation of traditions:''' A cheeky little opinion piece I wrote criticising the negative and celebrating the positive ways Western tuning theory has borrowed from the world’s traditions: '''[[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]]'''
* '''Comma naming debate brainstorm:''' A futile attempt I made to try to begin resolving one of the big behind the scenes debates among wiki editors: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Brainstorming mostly bad ideas to solve the comma naming debate]]
* '''Comma naming debate brainstorm:''' A futile attempt I made to try to begin resolving one of the big behind the scenes debates among wiki editors: '''[[User:BudjarnLambeth/Brainstorming mostly bad ideas to solve the comma naming debate]]'''
* '''My preferred EDO subgroups:''' A list of subgroup interpretations for the first 50 and a bit EDOs. Also includes a description of [[12edo]] as a 2.3.5.17.19 subgroup [[temperament]] with a list of [[chord]]s and [[interval]]s viewed from that lens: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/How I choose a subgroup for an EDO]]
* '''My preferred EDO subgroups:''' A list of subgroup interpretations for the first 50 and a bit EDOs. Also includes a description of [[12edo]] as a 2.3.5.17.19 subgroup [[temperament]] with a list of [[chord]]s and [[interval]]s viewed from that lens: '''[[User:BudjarnLambeth/How I choose a subgroup for an EDO]]'''
<br><br>
<br><br>