User:BudjarnLambeth: Difference between revisions

Line 522:

* We should take ourselves less seriously: we should have more fun, we should be more silly 🎉

* It’s fine to explore the 2.3.5.101 [[subgroup]] if you want to. It doesn’t matter that it’s less [[concordant]] than 2.3.5.7. Explore it anyway and see what happens. Do some stuff with [[:Category:Novelties|arbitrary numbers]] that don’t make logical sense and just see what comes of it. That’s where the fun is! (Though do keep a “2.3” or “3.5” in there just to smooth over the gnarliest edges, heehee.)

* I would prefer to use a temperament [[Temperament naming|named]] something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “countertrihexakleismatic” even if it’s super [[damage|accurate]] and [[badness|~~technicallt~~ better]] - a bland name can kill a temperament’s appeal, a fun name can create appeal out of nothing.

* I would prefer to use a temperament [[Temperament naming|named]] something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “countertrihexakleismatic” even if it’s super [[damage|accurate]] and [[badness|technically better]] - a bland name can kill a temperament’s appeal, a fun name can create appeal out of nothing.

* A cheeky little opinion piece I wrote criticising the negative and celebrating the positive ways Western tuning theory has borrowed from the world’s traditions: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]]

* A futile attempt I made to try to begin resolving one of the big behind the scenes debates among wiki editors: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Brainstorming mostly bad ideas to solve the comma naming debate]]

@@ Line 522: / Line 522: @@
 * We should take ourselves less seriously: we should have more fun, we should be more silly 🎉
 * It’s fine to explore the 2.3.5.101 [[subgroup]] if you want to. It doesn’t matter that it’s less [[concordant]] than 2.3.5.7. Explore it anyway and see what happens. Do some stuff with [[:Category:Novelties|arbitrary numbers]] that don’t make logical sense and just see what comes of it. That’s where the fun is! (Though do keep a “2.3” or “3.5” in there just to smooth over the gnarliest edges, heehee.)
-* I would prefer to use a temperament [[Temperament naming|named]] something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “countertrihexakleismatic” even if it’s super [[damage|accurate]] and [[badness|technicallt better]] - a bland name can kill a temperament’s appeal, a fun name can create appeal out of nothing.
+* I would prefer to use a temperament [[Temperament naming|named]] something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “countertrihexakleismatic” even if it’s super [[damage|accurate]] and [[badness|technically better]] - a bland name can kill a temperament’s appeal, a fun name can create appeal out of nothing.
 * A cheeky little opinion piece I wrote criticising the negative and celebrating the positive ways Western tuning theory has borrowed from the world’s traditions: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]]
 * A futile attempt I made to try to begin resolving one of the big behind the scenes debates among wiki editors: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Brainstorming mostly bad ideas to solve the comma naming debate]]