Godtone
Joined 17 December 2020
m →My Python 3 code: do conversion & simplification in correct place |
new section linking subpages |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== [[User:Godtone/Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy|Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy]] (W.I.P) == | == [[User:Godtone/Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy|Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy]] (W.I.P) == | ||
If you want to contribute make sure the temperaments make sure to follow the format, such as specifying the exact note count needed for a set of odds separately from the smallest MOS scale that has at least or more than that number of notes. The focus is on practically-useful temperaments of general interest. Many temperaments have not yet been documented there. It's supposed to be a compilation of "cream of the crop" basically, sorted by accuracy so that you can determine your own accuracy-to-simplicity tradeoff that is best for you, but note many higher-accuracy temperaments there are simple ''despite'' being accurate, so I recommend looking at the note counts and set of targetted odds for higher-accuracy stuff first. | If you want to contribute make sure the temperaments make sure to follow the format, such as specifying the exact note count needed for a set of odds separately from the smallest MOS scale that has at least or more than that number of notes. The focus is on practically-useful temperaments of general interest. Many temperaments have not yet been documented there. It's supposed to be a compilation of "cream of the crop" basically, sorted by accuracy so that you can determine your own accuracy-to-simplicity tradeoff that is best for you, but note many higher-accuracy temperaments there are simple ''despite'' being accurate, so I recommend looking at the note counts and set of targetted odds for higher-accuracy stuff first. | ||
== zeta and optimal_edo_sequence == | |||
On a separate subpage I've shown the best scoring equal temperaments according to the zeta function, using a small modification to the code kindly provided at [[User:Sintel/Zeta plot python]]: | |||
* [[User:Godtone/zeta]] | |||
Whose significance is backed up by the more psychoacoustically-informed tuning metrics I've designed (<code>optimal_edo_sequence</code>s from [[#My Python 3 code]]): | |||
* [[User:Godtone/optimal edo sequences]] | |||
...as well as by my own knowledge of tuning theory. | |||
== Simple ratios and where I think limits should be drawn == | == Simple ratios and where I think limits should be drawn == | ||