22edo: Difference between revisions

m "Assumed subgroup" lol what
Standardize the layout somewhat
Line 8: Line 8:
{{Wikipedia|22 equal temperament}}
{{Wikipedia|22 equal temperament}}
{{ED intro}} Because it distinguishes [[10/9]] and [[9/8]], it is not a [[meantone]] system.
{{ED intro}} Because it distinguishes [[10/9]] and [[9/8]], it is not a [[meantone]] system.
== History ==
The idea of dividing the octave into 22 steps of equal size seems to have originated with nineteenth century music theorist {{w|Robert Holford Macdowall Bosanquet|R. H. M. Bosanquet}}. Inspired by the supposed division of the octave into 22 unequal parts in the [[Indian music|music theory of India]], Bosanquet noted that such an equal division was capable of representing 5-limit music with tolerable accuracy. In this he was followed in the twentieth century by theorist José Würschmidt, who noted it as a possible next step after [[19edo]], and {{w|James Murray Barbour|J. Murray Barbour}} in his classic survey of tuning history, ''Tuning and Temperament''.


== Theory ==
== Theory ==
Line 22: Line 25:
22edo is also the third-smallest edo (after [[10edo]] and [[15edo]]) that maintains [[minimal consistent EDOs|25% or lower relative error]] on all of the first eight harmonics of the [[harmonic series]].
22edo is also the third-smallest edo (after [[10edo]] and [[15edo]]) that maintains [[minimal consistent EDOs|25% or lower relative error]] on all of the first eight harmonics of the [[harmonic series]].


=== Temperaments ===
=== Prime harmonics ===
{{Harmonics in equal|22|columns=11}}
 
=== As a tuning of other temperaments ===
==== Observance of 81/80 ====
==== Observance of 81/80 ====
22edo, unlike 12 and 19, is not a system of [[meantone]] temperament, and as such it distinguishes a number of [[3-limit]] and [[5-limit]] intervals that meantone tunings (most notably [[12edo]], [[19edo]], 31edo, and 43edo) do not distinguish, such as the two whole tones of 9/8 and 10/9. Indeed, these distinctions are significantly exaggerated in 22edo in comparison to 5-limit JI and many more accurate temperaments such as [[34edo]], [[41edo]], and [[53edo]], allowing many opportunities for alternate interpretations of their harmony. As a result of the observance of 81/80, the standard 5-limit diatonic scale does not collapse to [[5L 2s|mosdiatonic]] as in meantone systems. Instead, it is a ternary scale
22edo, unlike 12 and 19, is not a system of [[meantone]] temperament, and as such it distinguishes a number of [[3-limit]] and [[5-limit]] intervals that meantone tunings (most notably [[12edo]], [[19edo]], 31edo, and 43edo) do not distinguish, such as the two whole tones of 9/8 and 10/9. Indeed, these distinctions are significantly exaggerated in 22edo in comparison to 5-limit JI and many more accurate temperaments such as [[34edo]], [[41edo]], and [[53edo]], allowing many opportunities for alternate interpretations of their harmony. As a result of the observance of 81/80, the standard 5-limit diatonic scale does not collapse to [[5L 2s|mosdiatonic]] as in meantone systems. Instead, it is a ternary scale
Line 54: Line 60:
=== Higher-limit interpretations ===
=== Higher-limit interpretations ===
22edo can also be treated as adding harmonics 3 and 5 to [[11edo]]'s 2.9.15.7.11.17 subgroup, making it a rather accurate 2.3.5.7.11.17 [[subgroup]] temperament. Let us also mind its approximation of the 31st harmonic is within half a cent, which is very accurate. It also approximates some intervals involving the 29th harmonic well, especially 29/24, which is also matched within half a cent. This leaves us with 2.3.5.7.11.17.29.31.  
22edo can also be treated as adding harmonics 3 and 5 to [[11edo]]'s 2.9.15.7.11.17 subgroup, making it a rather accurate 2.3.5.7.11.17 [[subgroup]] temperament. Let us also mind its approximation of the 31st harmonic is within half a cent, which is very accurate. It also approximates some intervals involving the 29th harmonic well, especially 29/24, which is also matched within half a cent. This leaves us with 2.3.5.7.11.17.29.31.  
=== History ===
The idea of dividing the octave into 22 steps of equal size seems to have originated with nineteenth century music theorist {{w|Robert Holford Macdowall Bosanquet|R. H. M. Bosanquet}}. Inspired by the supposed division of the octave into 22 unequal parts in the [[Indian music|music theory of India]], Bosanquet noted that such an equal division was capable of representing 5-limit music with tolerable accuracy. In this he was followed in the twentieth century by theorist José Würschmidt, who noted it as a possible next step after [[19edo]], and {{w|James Murray Barbour|J. Murray Barbour}} in his classic survey of tuning history, ''Tuning and Temperament''.
=== Prime harmonics ===
{{Harmonics in equal|22|columns=11}}


== Intervals ==
== Intervals ==