46edo: Difference between revisions
m →Approximation to JI: another pass on style |
Tristanbay (talk | contribs) →Commas: Using the reference feature for a note about the ratio column is inappropriate imo (it puts the reference text in the last section in the article). Switched it to asterisks Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 849: | Line 849: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! [[Harmonic limit|Prime<br>Limit]] | ! [[Harmonic limit|Prime<br>Limit]] | ||
! [[Ratio]] | ! [[Ratio]]* | ||
! [[Monzo]] | ! [[Monzo]] | ||
! [[Cent]]s | ! [[Cent]]s | ||
| Line 1,016: | Line 1,016: | ||
| Semitonisma | | Semitonisma | ||
|} | |} | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki> Ratios longer than 10 digits are presented by placeholders with informative hints. | |||
46et is lower in relative error than any previous equal temperaments in the 17-, 19-, 23-limit, and others. The next equal temperaments doing better in the aforementioned subgroups are 72, 72, 94, respectively. 46et is even more prominent in the no-19 23-limit, and the next equal temperament doing better in this subgroup is 140. | 46et is lower in relative error than any previous equal temperaments in the 17-, 19-, 23-limit, and others. The next equal temperaments doing better in the aforementioned subgroups are 72, 72, 94, respectively. 46et is even more prominent in the no-19 23-limit, and the next equal temperament doing better in this subgroup is 140. | ||