User:BudjarnLambeth/Draft related tunings section: Difference between revisions
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
* Medium priority: {{EDOs| 49, 50, 57, 58, 59 }}. | * Medium priority: {{EDOs| 49, 50, 57, 58, 59 }}. | ||
* Medium-low priority: {{EDOs| (others from 61-313 which are well suited to octave stretch/compression) }}. | * Medium-low priority: {{EDOs| (others from 61-313 which are well suited to octave stretch/compression) }}. | ||
* Low priority: {{EDOs| 20, 21, 28, 40, 43, 44, 46, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, (others from 61-124 which are not well suited}}. | * Low priority: {{EDOs| 20, 21, 28, 40, 43, 44, 46, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, (others from 61-124 which are not well suited) }}. | ||
* Lowest priority: {{EDOs| (others bigger than 125 which are not well suited) }}. | * Lowest priority: {{EDOs| (others bigger than 125 which are not well suited) }}. | ||
''Priority is higher if: there is already discussion about stretch, compression, nearby tunings or zeta on the page / the edo lends itself to stretch or compression (e.g. of the primes with 20-40% relative error, most tend in the same direction) / the edo gets a lot of attention (it's small, or especially good, or the page is especially long, or it gets used a lot by composers).'' | ''Priority is higher if: there is already discussion about stretch, compression, nearby tunings or zeta on the page / the edo lends itself to stretch or compression (e.g. of the primes with 20-40% relative error, most tend in the same direction) / the edo gets a lot of attention (it's small, or especially good, or the page is especially long, or it gets used a lot by composers).'' | ||