User:Eboone/EDO Impressions: Difference between revisions

Line 58:

# '''Unique'''

These are just guidelines that I tend to follow, and they in no way provide a concrete method of objectifying edos. However, knowing what I'm looking for will greatly aid in understanding why I place certain edos where I do. For example, ~~53edo~~ is certainly on the larger side, yet it still resides in S tier because it's just so consonant. It really puts into perspective just how consonant it is if I'm willing to place it that high in spite of the amount of notes.

These are just guidelines that I tend to follow, and they in no way provide a concrete method of objectifying edos. However, knowing what I'm looking for will greatly aid in understanding why I place certain edos where I do. For example, 41edo is certainly on the larger side, yet it still resides in S tier because it's just so consonant. It really puts into perspective just how consonant it is if I'm willing to place it that high in spite of the amount of notes.

Plus, these aren't the only guidelines. '''[[MOS scales]]''' are also considered, especially if they are scales that I find particularly interesting. This is largely subjective, as I really have no way of classifying mosses in any sort of objective way. '''Factors''' are also considered, as the factors of an edo determine a lot about its structure. Certain intervals that are technically dissonant may also greatly contribute to an edo's high rating, such as the major third in 17edo (foreshadowing). At the end of the day, everything on this page is based on my own recreational research and opinions, so I'm sorry if your favorite edo is in D tier simply because it doesn't meet my criteria for what makes an edo desirable.

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 # '''Unique'''
-These are just guidelines that I tend to follow, and they in no way provide a concrete method of objectifying edos. However, knowing what I'm looking for will greatly aid in understanding why I place certain edos where I do. For example, 53edo is certainly on the larger side, yet it still resides in S tier because it's just so consonant. It really puts into perspective just how consonant it is if I'm willing to place it that high in spite of the amount of notes.
+These are just guidelines that I tend to follow, and they in no way provide a concrete method of objectifying edos. However, knowing what I'm looking for will greatly aid in understanding why I place certain edos where I do. For example, 41edo is certainly on the larger side, yet it still resides in S tier because it's just so consonant. It really puts into perspective just how consonant it is if I'm willing to place it that high in spite of the amount of notes.
 Plus, these aren't the only guidelines. '''[[MOS scales]]''' are also considered, especially if they are scales that I find particularly interesting. This is largely subjective, as I really have no way of classifying mosses in any sort of objective way. '''Factors''' are also considered, as the factors of an edo determine a lot about its structure. Certain intervals that are technically dissonant may also greatly contribute to an edo's high rating, such as the major third in 17edo (foreshadowing). At the end of the day, everything on this page is based on my own recreational research and opinions, so I'm sorry if your favorite edo is in D tier simply because it doesn't meet my criteria for what makes an edo desirable.