12edo: Difference between revisions
→Approximation to JI: I can't recommend this huge whitespace |
→Regular temperament properties: cleanup |
||
| Line 441: | Line 441: | ||
| 2.3 | | 2.3 | ||
| {{monzo| -19 12 }} | | {{monzo| -19 12 }} | ||
| | | {{mapping| 12 19 }} | ||
| +0.62 | | +0.62 | ||
| 0.62 | | 0.62 | ||
| Line 448: | Line 448: | ||
| 2.3.5 | | 2.3.5 | ||
| 81/80, 128/125 | | 81/80, 128/125 | ||
| | | {{mapping| 12 19 28 }} | ||
| −1.56 | | −1.56 | ||
| 3.11 | | 3.11 | ||
| Line 455: | Line 455: | ||
| 2.3.5.7 | | 2.3.5.7 | ||
| 36/35, 50/49, 64/63 | | 36/35, 50/49, 64/63 | ||
| | | {{mapping| 12 19 28 34 }} | ||
| −3.95 | | −3.95 | ||
| 4.92 | | 4.92 | ||
| 4.94 | | 4.94 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2.3.5.7.17 | |||
| 36/35, 50/49, 51/49, 64/63 | |||
| {{mapping| 12 19 28 34 49 }} | |||
| −2.92 | |||
| 4.86 | |||
| 4.87 | |||
|- | |||
| 2.3.5.7.17.19 | |||
| 36/35, 50/49, 51/49, 57/56, 64/63 | |||
| {{mapping| 12 19 28 34 49 51 }} | |||
| −2.53 | |||
| 4.52 | |||
| 4.53 | |||
|- style="border-top: double;" | |||
| 2.3.5.17 | | 2.3.5.17 | ||
| 51/50, 81/80, 128/125 | | 51/50, 81/80, 128/125 | ||
| | | {{mapping| 12 19 28 49 }} | ||
| −0.87 | | −0.87 | ||
| 2.95 | | 2.95 | ||
| 2.95 | | 2.95 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2.3.5.17.19 | | 2.3.5.17.19 | ||
| 51/50, 76/75, 81/80, 128/125 | | 51/50, 76/75, 81/80, 128/125 | ||
| | | {{mapping| 12 19 28 49 51 }} | ||
| −0.81 | | −0.81 | ||
| 2.64 | | 2.64 | ||
| 2.64 | | 2.64 | ||
|} | |} | ||
* 12et (12f val) is lower in relative error than any previous equal temperaments in the 3-, 5-, 7-, 11-, 13-, and 19-limit. The next equal temperaments doing better in those subgroups are 41, 19, 19, 22, 19/19e, and 19egh, respectively. 12et is even more prominent in the 2.3.5.7.17.19 subgroup, and the next equal temperament that does this better is 72. | |||
12et (12f val) is lower in relative error than any previous equal temperaments in the 3-, 5-, 7-, 11-, 13-, and 19-limit. The next | |||
=== Uniform maps === | === Uniform maps === | ||