User:Zhenlige/EDO impressions: Difference between revisions
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*If (2n+1)-edo is good, then n-edo and (n+1)-edo are probably bad, or at least heavily inconsistent, because many intervals near the half octave (especially [[3/2]]) will be off. | *If (2n+1)-edo is good, then n-edo and (n+1)-edo are probably bad, or at least heavily inconsistent, because many intervals near the half octave (especially [[3/2]]) will be off. | ||
*If m-edo and n-edo are good, and most intervals are either accurate enough or off in the opposite directions, then (m+n)-edo is probably good. | *If m-edo and n-edo are good, and most intervals are either accurate enough or off in the opposite directions, then (m+n)-edo is probably good. | ||
*The [[JI subgroup]] an EDO supports matters. An EDO whose subgroup is not prime is better viewed as a subset of a larger temperament (either another EDO or a higher-rank temperament), than as a temperament itself. | *The [[JI subgroup]] an EDO supports matters. An EDO whose subgroup is not prime (especially when it is fractional) is better viewed as a subset of a larger temperament (either another EDO or a higher-rank temperament), than as a temperament itself. | ||
== Details == | == Details == | ||