User:Zhenlige/EDO impressions: Difference between revisions

Zhenlige (talk | contribs)
Zhenlige (talk | contribs)
Line 24: Line 24:
*[[17edo|17]]: A circle of fifths in [[34edo]]. Interesting sharp fifths. The fact that its thirds do not approximate any simple ratios well is a pity. (or benefit? I don't know)
*[[17edo|17]]: A circle of fifths in [[34edo]]. Interesting sharp fifths. The fact that its thirds do not approximate any simple ratios well is a pity. (or benefit? I don't know)
*[[18edo|18]]: Incomplete [[36edo]].
*[[18edo|18]]: Incomplete [[36edo]].
*[[19edo|19]]: Very different tradeoffs from 12edo. Usable but imperfect for many temperaments. [[Meantone]] or [[magic]], but with a too flat fifth. Strangely large minor 2nds. Also a compressed [[Carlos Beta]]. For meantone [[31edo]] is more preferable, and for magic [[41edo]]. The lower bound of a good fifth. Good as a subset of [[enneadecal]].
*[[19edo|19]]: Very different tradeoffs from 12edo. Usable but imperfect for many temperaments. [[Meantone]] or [[magic]], but with a too flat fifth. Strangely large minor 2nds. Also a compressed [[Carlos Beta]]. For meantone [[31edo]] is more preferable, and for magic [[41edo]]. The lower bound of a good fifth. It benefits from stretching. Good as a subset of [[enneadecal]].
*[[20edo|20]]: The fact that [[41edo]] is good indicates that 20- and 21edo are probably bad. Does anyone really think an inconsistent 27 can be used with a 3 or 9?
*[[20edo|20]]: The fact that [[41edo]] is good indicates that 20- and 21edo are probably bad. Does anyone really think an inconsistent 27 can be used with a 3 or 9?
*...
*...