User:Zhenlige/EDO impressions: Difference between revisions
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*[[17edo|17]]: A circle of fifths in [[34edo]]. Interesting sharp fifths. The fact that its thirds do not approximate any simple ratios well is a pity. (or benefit? I don't know) | *[[17edo|17]]: A circle of fifths in [[34edo]]. Interesting sharp fifths. The fact that its thirds do not approximate any simple ratios well is a pity. (or benefit? I don't know) | ||
*[[18edo|18]]: Incomplete [[36edo]]. | *[[18edo|18]]: Incomplete [[36edo]]. | ||
*[[19edo|19]]: Very different tradeoffs from 12edo. Usable but imperfect for many temperaments. [[Meantone]] or [[magic]], but with a too flat fifth. Strangely large minor 2nds. Also a compressed [[Carlos Beta]]. For meantone [[31edo]] is more preferable, and for magic [[41edo]]. The lower bound of a good fifth. Good as a subset of [[enneadecal]]. | *[[19edo|19]]: Very different tradeoffs from 12edo. Usable but imperfect for many temperaments. [[Meantone]] or [[magic]], but with a too flat fifth. Strangely large minor 2nds. Also a compressed [[Carlos Beta]]. For meantone [[31edo]] is more preferable, and for magic [[41edo]]. The lower bound of a good fifth. It benefits from stretching. Good as a subset of [[enneadecal]]. | ||
*[[20edo|20]]: The fact that [[41edo]] is good indicates that 20- and 21edo are probably bad. Does anyone really think an inconsistent 27 can be used with a 3 or 9? | *[[20edo|20]]: The fact that [[41edo]] is good indicates that 20- and 21edo are probably bad. Does anyone really think an inconsistent 27 can be used with a 3 or 9? | ||
*... | *... | ||