Xenwolf
Joined 17 September 2018
Line 893: | Line 893: | ||
Hello Xenwolf, | Hello Xenwolf, | ||
We (including [[User:SupahstarSaga]], [[User:Fredg999]] and I) would like to resurrect [[Xenharmonic_Wiki:Things_to_do#Odd_harmonics_table_instead_of_prime_harmonics_for_edos|an old suggestion of mine]], namely using odds instead of primes. This is because odd mappings give more information at a glance than primes: odd harmonic mappings don't always correspond to prime mappings (for example, a stack of two best 3's don't always make the best 9), and subgroup interpretations can sometimes care about ratios between odds harmonics, for example, 7/5 and 11/5. I made a template implementing this suggestion here: [[User:Inthar/Template:Harmonics_in_edo]]. We also want to do this with other equal-step tunings such as [[13edt]]. | We (including [[User:SupahstarSaga]], [[User:Fredg999]] and I) would like to resurrect [[Xenharmonic_Wiki:Things_to_do#Odd_harmonics_table_instead_of_prime_harmonics_for_edos|an old suggestion of mine]], namely using odds instead of primes. This is because odd mappings give more information at a glance than primes: odd harmonic mappings don't always correspond to prime mappings (for example, a stack of two best 3's don't always make the best 9), and subgroup interpretations can sometimes care about ratios between odds harmonics, for example, 7/5 and 11/5. I made a template implementing this suggestion here: [[User:Inthar/Template:Harmonics_in_edo]]. We also want to do this with other equal-step tunings such as [[13edt]]. Tom Price also suggested an additional visual idea I really like. We could try implementing that with Lua, but in the meantime I think this will do. | ||
I'd just like to reopen the discussion about this suggested change. Please let me know if you have any concerns. | |||
[[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 21:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC) | [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 21:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC) |