217edo: Difference between revisions

Notation: no overwidth tables
Tristanbay (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 178: Line 178:
== Notation ==
== Notation ==
=== Sagittal ===
=== Sagittal ===
217edo can be written in Sagittal using almost the entire Athenian extension (except for {{sagittal| |\ }} {{sagittal| !/ }} {{sagittal| /|| }} {{sagittal| \!! }} since it tempers [[1240029/1239040]]), by virtue of its apotome being equal to 21 edosteps, which is the maximum equal division of the apotome (eda) supported by Athenian<ref name=":0">[[Ragismic microtemperaments#Brahmagupta]]</ref>. It is identical to [[224edo]]'s Sagittal notation, but it uses the 11/7C for the +6/-6 alteration instead of 55C.<ref name=":1">https://sagittal.org/sagittal.pdf p. 11</ref>
217edo can be written in Sagittal using almost the entire Athenian extension (except for {{sagittal| |\ }} {{sagittal| !/ }} {{sagittal| /|| }} {{sagittal| \!! }} since it tempers out [[1240029/1239040]]), by virtue of its apotome being equal to 21 edosteps, which is the maximum equal division of the apotome (eda) supported by Athenian. It is identical to [[224edo]]'s Sagittal notation, but it uses the 11/7C for the +6/-6 alteration instead of 55C.<ref name=":1">[[George Secor|George D. Secor]] and [[David Keenan|David C. Keenan]], [https://sagittal.org/sagittal.pdf ''Sagittal – A Microtonal Notation System''], p. 11.</ref>


It shares the same exact symbol system as the Athenian notation for Just Intonation or ''Medium-precision JI notation.''<ref name=":1" />
It shares the same exact symbol system as the Athenian notation for just intonation or ''Medium-precision JI notation.''<ref name=":1"/>


{| class="wikitable center-all"
{| class="wikitable center-all"
Line 324: Line 324:


=== 31edo-based notation ===
=== 31edo-based notation ===
Since 217edo is 31*7, one ''could'' base the notation on its inherited meantone fifth 126\217 (18\31) instead of its best fifth.  
Since {{nowrap| 217 {{=}} 31 × 7 }}, one ''could'' base the notation on its inherited meantone fifth 126\217 (18\31) instead of its best fifth.  


This could be useful when [[31edo]] as a base tuning, where the whole palette of 217edo is only used to provide subtle inflections of the [[31edo]] pitches, similar to how one might use [[159edo]] to provide subtle corrections of [[53edo]] pitches.
This could be useful when [[31edo]] is used as a base tuning, where the whole palette of 217edo is only used to provide subtle inflections of the 31edo pitches, similar to how one might use [[159edo]] to provide subtle corrections of [[53edo]] pitches.


{| class="wikitable center-all"
{| class="wikitable center-all"