User talk:Xenwolf: Difference between revisions

Line 685:

Hey, Xenwolf, I now know that all 13-limit superparticular commas have been named, but is the same thing true with all the 17-limit superparticulars? If not, I'm thinking 936/935 needs a name. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:52, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

: Sorry, I don't see an urgent need (compare [[Special:WhatLinksHere/936/935]]). If you really find names that clarify things, there will be nobody to disagree. In other words, I find it rather boring and also not very purposeful to discuss mediocre names. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:52, 28 December 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:27, 28 December 2020 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →936/935: re Newer edit →
Line 685:		Line 685:

	Hey, Xenwolf, I now know that all 13-limit superparticular commas have been named, but is the same thing true with all the 17-limit superparticulars? If not, I'm thinking 936/935 needs a name. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 15:52, 28 December 2020 (UTC)		Hey, Xenwolf, I now know that all 13-limit superparticular commas have been named, but is the same thing true with all the 17-limit superparticulars? If not, I'm thinking 936/935 needs a name. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 15:52, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

			: Sorry, I don't see an urgent need (compare [[Special:WhatLinksHere/936/935]]). If you really find names that clarify things, there will be nobody to disagree. In other words, I find it rather boring and also not very purposeful to discuss mediocre names. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 19:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)