Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions
→Too many short interval pages to fit in "todo:expand" or "stubs": Said thanks and agreed with reply, said what the plan would be next if others also agree with option A |
|||
| Line 420: | Line 420: | ||
: I have a preference for solution A. We can think of a few criteria to determine what's an important interval page, e.g. below some threshold for at least one metric, from a list of a few relevant metrics (we might want to discuss this on Discord and/or poll the community for their input). Otherwise, I wouldn't want to make it look like there's an urgent need to fill hundreds of pages with content without any obvious need from the community, and that is why I don't like solutions B and C as much. In general, stuff like stub and todo templates should be placed while taking into consideration the importance of the page, so it's expected that narrower topics have shorter pages, including very specific intervals with fewer applications; those can be expanded at any time, of course, but we don't necessarily need a flashing light pointing to them. By the way, thank you for offering to help with recategorizing the pages, this is a big amount of manual work and it is appreciated. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 06:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | : I have a preference for solution A. We can think of a few criteria to determine what's an important interval page, e.g. below some threshold for at least one metric, from a list of a few relevant metrics (we might want to discuss this on Discord and/or poll the community for their input). Otherwise, I wouldn't want to make it look like there's an urgent need to fill hundreds of pages with content without any obvious need from the community, and that is why I don't like solutions B and C as much. In general, stuff like stub and todo templates should be placed while taking into consideration the importance of the page, so it's expected that narrower topics have shorter pages, including very specific intervals with fewer applications; those can be expanded at any time, of course, but we don't necessarily need a flashing light pointing to them. By the way, thank you for offering to help with recategorizing the pages, this is a big amount of manual work and it is appreciated. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 06:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
:: Thank you for the input, after reading your explanation I too am leaning towards solution A. I will wait to see what others say first, but if that’s also how others are feeling, then I’ll be happy to take that route. | |||
:: If we do end up going with Solution A, then on Jan 1, I will first of all just look through all the interval pages currently marked as stub or todo:expand, and see what types of groups they fall into. | |||
:: Then I will run a poll on which of those groups of interval pages are important to expand, and which ones are not. Then I will add or remove the categories to pages based on the criteria set by the poll results. | |||
:: Thank you again for your help :) And Happy Holidays as well :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 06:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||