Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions
Mousemambo (talk | contribs) |
Mousemambo (talk | contribs) →Improve accessibility of wiki and present info in a non-technical way: plain-language introductions for foundational terminology articles |
||
| Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
"Things to do" page, since categorizing and tagging appropriately fit that imperative. | "Things to do" page, since categorizing and tagging appropriately fit that imperative. | ||
[[User:Mousemambo|Mousemambo]] ([[User talk:Mousemambo|talk]]) 09:16, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | [[User:Mousemambo|Mousemambo]] ([[User talk:Mousemambo|talk]]) 09:16, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
: From the Discord channel... "Fumica (41et) — 2023-Sep-07 at 6:58 AM There's no difference between category: todo: add introduction and category: todo: intro" [[User:Mousemambo|Mousemambo]] ([[User talk:Mousemambo|talk]]) 17:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
Perhaps there needs to be a Todo for a specific problem I frequently encounter in the Xen Wiki, even for critical foundational terminology articles: The very first paragraph, even the very first line, is written with math-speak and it's not rare for it to include math theory beyond high-school/algebra level. I offer the article for [[Harmonic limit]] as an example: "In just intonation, the p-limit or p-prime-limit consists of the ratios of p-smooth numbers, where a p-smooth number is an integer with prime factors no larger than p." I don't think it's a horrible article. But 1) The first line refers to "p-smooth numbers" which is higher-math-speak (regardless of it being a link, I shouldn't need to know what number theory is) and the majority of people are math-phobic and will walk away right there; (2) The article is called "Harmonic limit" and there's no use of that term in the article or explanation of what's "harmonic" about the p-limit. | |||
I strongly suggest that all [[User:Mousemambo/Introduction_to_xenharmonic_music_terminology|foundational terminology articles]] should open with a plain-language introduction. I'd actually rather not have any advanced (post-algebra) math language even appear before a plain-language section is presented — one that will provide a beginner everything they need to have a strong basic understanding of the topic. I don't yet have a suggestion for what such a section should be called... "Basic summary" may sound a bit condescending, but I am unsure. I don't think that "Harmonic limit" needs a whole plain-language section. But perhaps a first line that gives a non-math summary/definition, then a paragraph of non-math explanation, and then finally a paragraph that opens with, "In mathematical terms, ...." | |||
I am thinking out loud here to illustrate my perspective. I note that the plain-language text will probably (maybe ideally) duplicate or paraphrase some text from any corresponding Wikipedia article (e.g. Wikipedia:Limit (music). But I suggest that this level of explanation is going to frequently be necessary to provide basic introductions that don't frighten people off with immediate complexity. I feel that a limited amount of duplicating Wikipedia should not be discouraged within a plain-language summary. Especially because one of the functions of beginner terminology articles is to encourage understanding from a xenharmonic rather than a conventional musicology perspective, and the Xen Wiki analogous article can do that. | |||
[[User:Mousemambo|Mousemambo]] ([[User talk:Mousemambo|talk]]) 17:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
=== Reorganize temperament pages === | === Reorganize temperament pages === | ||