Biyatismic clan

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Revision as of 14:35, 1 December 2025 by FloraC (talk | contribs) (Aphrodite: rework)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This is a list showing technical temperament data. For an explanation of what information is shown here, you may look at the technical data guide for regular temperaments.

The biyatismic clan of rank-3 temperaments tempers out the biyatisma, 121/120.

Temperaments discussed elsewhere are:

Considered below are zeus, artemis, oxpecker, kahoupokane, big brother, aphrodite, and the no-7 subgroup temperament, protomere. For the rank-4 biyatismic temperament, see Rank-4 temperament #Biyatismic (121/120).

Protomere

Subgroup: 2.3.5.11

Comma list: 121/120

Subgroup-val mapping[1 0 1 2], 0 1 1 1], 0 0 -2 -1]]

mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~11/10

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.6628 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.8452 ¢, ~11/10 = 157.8337 ¢
error map: +0.663 +0.553 +1.190 -5.318]
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.9848 ¢, ~12/11 = 157.6099 ¢
error map: 0.000 +0.030 +0.451 -6.943]

Optimal ET sequence7, 15, 22, 31, 46, 53, 137e, 183ee, 190ee

Badness (Sintel): 0.245

Zeus

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 121/120, 176/175

Mapping[1 0 1 4 2], 0 1 1 -1 1], 0 0 -2 3 1]]

Mapping to lattice: [0 1 -1 2 0], 0 1 1 -1 1]]

Lattice basis:

11/10, 11/8
Angle (11/10, 11/8) = 87.464 degrees

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.1693 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.2521 ¢, ~12/11 = 157.1102 ¢
error map: +0.169 +0.466 +2.057 +0.761 -5.668]
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.2478 ¢, ~12/11 = 157.1265 ¢
error map: 0.000 +0.293 +1.681 +0.306 -6.197]

Minimax tuning:

[[1 0 0 0 0, [11/9 10/9 -1/3 -2/9 0, [22/9 2/9 1/3 -4/9 0, [22/9 2/9 -2/3 5/9 0, [10/3 2/3 0 -1/3 0]
unchanged-interval (eigenmonzo) basis: 2.9/5.9/7

Optimal ET sequence15, 22, 31, 46, 53, 68, 77, 99, 130e

Badness (Sintel): 0.480

Projection pairs: 5 600/121 7 2662/375 11 120/11 to 2.3.11/5

Zeus11[22] hobbit transversal

33/32, 16/15, 11/10, 8/7, 64/55, 77/64, 5/4, 14/11, 4/3,
11/8, 45/32, 16/11, 3/2, 11/7, 8/5, 5/3, 55/32, 7/4,
11/6, 15/8, 64/33, 2

Zeus11[24] hobbit transversal

33/32, 16/15, 11/10, 9/8, 8/7, 77/64, 11/9, 5/4, 21/16, 4/3,
11/8, 45/32, 16/11, 3/2, 32/21, 8/5, 18/11, 5/3, 7/4, 16/9,
11/6, 15/8, 64/33, 2

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 121/120, 176/175, 351/350

Mapping: [1 0 1 4 2 7], 0 1 1 -1 1 -2], 0 0 -2 3 -1 -1]]

Mapping to lattice: [0 1 -1 2 0 -3], 0 1 1 -1 1 -2]]

Lattice basis:

11/10 length = 0.7898, 11/8 length = 1.002
Angle (11/10, 11/8) = 106.7439 degrees

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.2411 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.0090 ¢, ~12/11 = 156.9897 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.8818 ¢, ~12/11 = 156.9568 ¢

Minimax tuning:

  • 13-odd-limit
[[1 0 0 0 0 0, [11/9 10/9 -1/3 -2/9 0 0, [22/9 2/9 1/3 -4/9 0 0, [22/9 2/9 -2/3 5/9 0 0, [10/3 2/3 0 -1/3 0 0, [14/3 -8/3 1 1/3 0 0]
unchanged-interval (eigenmonzo) basis: 2.9/5.9/7
  • 15-odd-limit
[[1 0 0 0 0 0, [0 1 0 0 0 0, [11/5 1/5 2/5 -2/5 0 0, [11/5 1/5 -3/5 3/5 0 0, [13/5 3/5 1/5 -1/5 0 0, [38/5 -12/5 1/5 -1/5 0 0]
unchanged-interval (eigenmonzo) basis: 2.3.7/5

Optimal ET sequence: 15f, 22, 31, 46, 53, 77, 99, 130e

Badness (Sintel): 0.873

Projection pairs: 5 600/121 7 2662/375 11 120/11 13 1280/99 to 2.3.11/5

Zeus13[22] hobbit transversal

260/243, 88/81, 11/10, 44/39, 162/143, 11/9, 16/13, 320/243, 4/3, 1040/729, 13/9, 729/520, 3/2, 99/65, 44/27, 18/11, 1280/729, 16/9, 11/6, 24/13, 243/130, 2

Tinia

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 66/65, 121/120, 176/175

Mapping: [1 0 1 4 2 2], 0 1 1 -1 1 1], 0 0 -2 3 -1 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1199.9251 ¢, ~3/2 = 699.2984 ¢, ~12/11 = 155.3569 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 699.2982 ¢, ~12/11 = 155.3484 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 9, 15, 22f, 24, 31

Badness (Sintel): 0.756

Artemis

Named by Graham Breed in 2011, artemis was found to be locally efficient in the higher limits among rank-3 extensions of marvel[1], although it is a weak extension. However, the alternative 13-limit extension called diana is more accurate.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 121/120, 225/224

Mapping[1 0 1 -3 2], 0 1 1 4 1], 0 0 -2 -4 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1201.2783 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.6174 ¢, ~11/10 = 158.4919 ¢
error map: +1.278 -0.059 -0.123 +0.955 -5.357]
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.2777 ¢, ~11/10 = 158.3100 ¢
error map: 0.000 -1.677 -2.656 -0.955 -9.350]

Optimal ET sequence9, 15d, 16d, 20, 22, 31, 53, 60e, 84e, 91e, 113e, 144ee

Badness (Sintel): 0.713

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 105/104, 121/120, 196/195

Mapping: [1 0 1 -3 2 -5], 0 1 1 4 1 6], 0 0 -2 -4 -1 -6]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1201.7896 ¢, ~3/2 = 699.7509 ¢, ~11/10 = 158.9484 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 699.1687 ¢, ~11/10 = 158.7345 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 9, 20, 22f, 29, 31, 60e, 129cddee

Badness (Sintel): 1.04

Diana

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 121/120, 225/224, 275/273

Mapping: [1 0 1 -3 2 7], 0 1 1 4 1 -2], 0 0 -2 -4 -1 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.9110 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.5110 ¢, ~11/10 = 159.1256 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.9717 ¢, ~11/10 = 158.7903 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 22, 29, 31, 53, 82e, 84e, 113e

Badness (Sintel): 1.07

Oxpecker

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 121/120, 126/125

Mapping[1 0 1 2 2], 0 1 1 1 1], 0 0 -2 -6 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.4124 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.1291 ¢, ~12/11 = 155.8292 ¢
error map: +0.412 -0.414 +3.982 -1.435 -4.781]
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.2359 ¢, ~12/11 = 155.7399 ¢
error map: 0.000 -0.719 +3.442 -2.029 -5.822]

Optimal ET sequence7d, 8d, 15, 23de, 24d, 31, 46, 77

Badness (Sintel): 0.840

Woodpecker

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 66/65, 121/120, 126/125

Mapping: [1 0 1 2 2 2], 0 1 1 1 1 1], 0 0 -2 -6 -1 1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1198.9113 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.9581 ¢, ~12/11 = 154.7247 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.6409 ¢, ~12/11 = 154.9115 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7d, 8d, 15, 23de, 24d, 31

Badness (Sintel): 1.02

Kahoupokane

Named by Tristan Bay in 2025, Kahoupokane tempers out 5120/5103 and may be described as the 29 & 46 & 53 temperament.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 121/120, 5120/5103

Mapping[1 0 1 11 2], 0 1 1 -5 1], 0 0 -2 -2 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.1911 ¢, ~3/2 = 703.1412 ¢, ~11/10 = 158.1068 ¢
error map: +0.191 +1.377 +0.996 +0.401 -5.710]
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 703.0417 ¢, ~11/10 = 157.9917 ¢
error map: 0.000 +1.087 +0.744 -0.018 -6.268]

Optimal ET sequence7, 17c, 24d, 29, 46, 53, 82e, 99

Badness (Sintel): 2.73

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 121/120, 169/168, 352/351

Mapping: [1 0 1 11 2 7], 0 1 1 -5 1 -2], 0 0 -2 -2 -1 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.4435 ¢, ~3/2 = 703.1443 ¢, ~11/10 = 158.4176 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.9013 ¢, ~11/10 = 158.1657 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 17c, 24d, 29, 46, 53, 82e, 99, 181eef

Badness (Sintel): 1.27

Big brother

For the 7-limit version, see Miscellaneous 7-limit temperaments #Nuwell.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 99/98, 121/120

Mapping[1 0 -5 -1 -1], 0 1 3 2 2], 0 0 4 1 2]]

mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~11/7

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.6559 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.2627 ¢, ~11/7 = 771.8821 ¢
error map: +0.656 -1.036 +0.691 +4.237 -6.372]
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.4019 ¢, ~11/7 = 771.2671 ¢
error map: 0.000 -1.553 -0.039 +3.245 -7.980]

Optimal ET sequence8d, 9, 14c, 17c, 22, 31, 53, 84e

Badness (Sintel): 0.609

Projection pairs: 5 2401/486, 11 98/9 to 2.3.7

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 66/65, 99/98, 121/120

Mapping: [1 0 3 1 3 1], 0 1 3 2 2 0], 0 0 -4 -1 -2 2]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1199.0121 ¢, ~3/2 = 699.9867 ¢, ~11/7 = 771.9817 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 699.7360 ¢, ~11/7 = 773.0154 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 8d, 9, 14c, 17c, 22f, 31, 79cf

Badness (Sintel): 0.889

Aphrodite

For the 7-limit version, see Miscellaneous 7-limit temperaments #Squalentine.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 121/120, 441/440

Mapping[1 0 1 3 2], 0 1 1 0 1], 0 0 -4 -3 -2]]

mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~22/21

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1201.0691 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.9439 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.7122 ¢
error map: +1.069 +0.058 +1.920 -1.755 -4.591]
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.8990 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.4412 ¢
error map: 0.000 -1.056 +0.820 -4.150 -7.301]

Optimal ET sequence14c, 15, 29, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 91e, 137de, 168dee

Badness (Sintel): 0.701

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 121/120, 351/350, 441/440

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 6], 0 1 1 0 1 -1], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -11]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1201.0656 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.7374 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.5908 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.7005 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.3253 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 14cf, 29ff, 31, 45ef, 46, 77, 122ee, 137def, 168deef

Badness (Sintel): 1.36

Eros

Eros fairs impressively into the 23-limit as a rank-3 temperament; not only is it fairly simple (considering this is a subgroup as complex as the full 23-limit, with many challenges) but has the pleasing property that all the harmonics are on the negative side of the last generator. Specifically, -3 to 2 fifths and -5 to 0 ~23/22's will provide odd harmonics 1–23 up to octave equivalence; you can think of this as a 6×6 grid, which is a recommendable place to start looking at its structure.

Tempering out the less accurate comma 121/120 can be seen as an implication of tempering out 441/440 (S21), 484/483 (S22), and 529/528 (S23). Therefore, characteristic of any good tuning is the prime 11 being the flattest prime, with other primes having strictly less than 5 ¢ of error.

This temperament was discovered by Scott Dakota. Note that the 17-limit extension requires the 29g val for 29edo, which has the sizes of 17/16 and 18/17 swapped.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 121/120, 196/195, 352/351

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 7], 0 1 1 0 1 -2], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -2]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.6419 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.8766 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.6564 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.5612 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.4778 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 17c, 29, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 106de, 183dee

Badness (Sintel): 1.08

17-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17

Comma list: 121/120, 154/153, 196/195, 352/351

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 7 6], 0 1 1 0 1 -2 -1], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -2 -5]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.6172 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.1026 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.7963 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.7925 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.6203 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 106de

Badness (Sintel): 0.931

19-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19

Comma list: 121/120, 154/153, 196/195, 286/285, 352/351

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 7 6 9], 0 1 1 0 1 -2 -1 -3], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -2 -5 0]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.6224 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.0959 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.8004 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.6963 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.6479 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 75dfgh, 77, 106de

Badness (Sintel): 1.16

23-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19.23

Comma list: 121/120, 154/153, 161/160, 196/195, 286/285, 352/351

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 7 6 9 3], 0 1 1 0 1 -2 -1 -3 1], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -2 -5 0 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.7268 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.2463 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.8824 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.8010 ¢, ~23/22 = 78.7188 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 75dfgh, 77, 106de

Badness (Sintel): 1.08

Inanna

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 105/104, 121/120, 275/273

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 1], 0 1 1 0 1 2], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -7]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1201.7881 ¢, ~3/2 = 699.8166 ¢, ~22/21 = 79.7282 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 699.5926 ¢, ~22/21 = 79.3822 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 14cf, 15, 29, 31, 45ef, 60e

Badness (Sintel): 1.01

Ishtar

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 91/90, 121/120, 441/440

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 -1], 0 1 1 0 1 3], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.7875 ¢, ~3/2 = 703.8568 ¢, ~22/21 = 79.0096 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 703.7640 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.8025 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 14cf, 15, 17c, 29, 31f, 46, 106deff, 121def

Badness (Sintel): 1.08

References