Pentacircle clan: Difference between revisions

m Little corrections
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 18: Line 18:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 703.8345, ~7/4 = 969.8722
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 703.8345, ~7/4 = 969.8722


{{Val list|legend=1| 12, 17, 36, 41, 58, 63, 104, 225e, 266e, 370bee, 699bbdeee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 17, 36, 41, 58, 63, 104, 225e, 266e, 370bee, 699bbdeee }}


[[Badness]]: 0.0205 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 0.0205 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 54: Line 54:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 703.8563, ~7/4 = 969.9074
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 703.8563, ~7/4 = 969.9074


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 12f, 17, 41, 46, 58, 87, 104, 266ef, 329bef, 370beef, 474beef, 595bdeeeff, 699bbdeeeff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12f, 17, 41, 46, 58, 87, 104, 266ef, 329bef, 370beef, 474beef, 595bdeeeff, 699bbdeeeff }}


Badness: 0.101 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 0.101 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 67: Line 67:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.0315, ~7/4 = 970.6051
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.0315, ~7/4 = 970.6051


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 12f, 17g, 29g, 41g, 46, 58, 75e, 104, 121, 225e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12f, 17g, 29g, 41g, 46, 58, 75e, 104, 121, 225e }}


Badness: 0.325 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 0.325 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 84: Line 84:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1814, ~7/4 = 970.6217
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1814, ~7/4 = 970.6217


{{Val list|legend=1| 17c, 29, 46, 92de, 121, 167, 288be }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17c, 29, 46, 92de, 121, 167, 288be }}


[[Badness]]: 5.35 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 5.35 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 97: Line 97:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1691, ~7/4 = 970.8432
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1691, ~7/4 = 970.8432


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 17c, 29, 46, 75e, 92def, 121, 167, 288be }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17c, 29, 46, 75e, 92def, 121, 167, 288be }}


Badness: 2.48 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 2.48 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 110: Line 110:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1628, ~7/4 = 970.6620
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1628, ~7/4 = 970.6620


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 17cg, 29g, 46, 75e, 92defg, 121, 167, 288beg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17cg, 29g, 46, 75e, 92defg, 121, 167, 288beg }}


Badness: 1.52 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.52 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 126: Line 126:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 703.9571, ~5/4 = 386.8863
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 703.9571, ~5/4 = 386.8863


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 80, 87, 121, 167, 208, 329b, 375b, 537b, 583b, 704bd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 80, 87, 121, 167, 208, 329b, 375b, 537b, 583b, 704bd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.165 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 0.165 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 139: Line 139:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.0412, ~5/4 = 387.2927
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.0412, ~5/4 = 387.2927


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 80, 87, 121, 167, 208, 334be, 375be, 542bce }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 80, 87, 121, 167, 208, 334be, 375be, 542bce }}


[[Badness]]: 1.039 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 1.039 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 152: Line 152:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 703.9605, ~5/4 = 386.9831
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 703.9605, ~5/4 = 386.9831


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, 46, 80, 87, 121, 167, 208, 375be, 583bef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 46, 80, 87, 121, 167, 208, 375be, 583bef }}


Badness: 1.021 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.021 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 165: Line 165:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.0831, ~5/4 = 387.3269
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.0831, ~5/4 = 387.3269


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, 46, 75e, 80, 87, 121, 167, 288beg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 46, 75e, 80, 87, 121, 167, 288beg }}


Badness: 0.982 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 0.982 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 182: Line 182:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~121/70 = 951.4956, ~5/4 = 386.7868
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~121/70 = 951.4956, ~5/4 = 386.7868


{{Val list|legend=1| 24, 29, 34d, 53d, 58, 87, 121, 145, 179e, 208, 266e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 24, 29, 34d, 53d, 58, 87, 121, 145, 179e, 208, 266e }}


[[Badness]]: 2.26 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 2.26 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 195: Line 195:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~26/15 = 951.8367, ~5/4 = 386.4048
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~26/15 = 951.8367, ~5/4 = 386.4048


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 24, 29, 34d, 53d, 58, 87, 121, 179ef, 208, 266ef, 474beef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 24, 29, 34d, 53d, 58, 87, 121, 179ef, 208, 266ef, 474beef }}


Badness: 1.06 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.06 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 210: Line 210:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~26/15 = 951.8015, ~5/4 = 386.9912
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~26/15 = 951.8015, ~5/4 = 386.9912


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 24, 34d, 58, 87, 121, 179ef, 208g, 266efg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 24, 34d, 58, 87, 121, 179ef, 208g, 266efg }}


Badness: 1.24 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.24 × 10<sup>-3</sup>