Hemimean family: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Xenllium (talk | contribs)
Fixed typo
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m Units, misc. cleanup, - redundant category
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Technical data page}}
{{Technical data page}}
The '''hemimean family''' of [[temperament]]s are [[rank-3 temperament]]s which [[temper out]] [[3136/3125]].  
The '''hemimean family''' of [[rank-3 temperament]]s [[tempering out|tempers out]] 3136/3125, the [[hemimean comma]].  


The hemimean comma, 3136/3125, is the ratio between the [[126/125|septimal semicomma (126/125)]] and the [[225/224|septimal kleisma (225/224)]]. This fact alone makes hemimean a very notable rank-3 temperament, as any non-meantone tuning of hemimean will split the [[81/80|syntonic comma (81/80)]] into two equal parts, each representing 126/125~225/224.  
The hemimean comma is the difference between the [[126/125|septimal semicomma (126/125)]] and the [[225/224|septimal kleisma (225/224)]]. This fact alone makes hemimean a very notable rank-3 temperament, as any non-meantone tuning of hemimean will split the [[81/80|syntonic comma (81/80)]] into two equal parts, each representing 126/125~225/224.  


Other equivalences characteristic to hemimean are [[128/125]]~[[50/49]] and [[49/45]]~([[25/24]])<sup>2</sup>.  
Other equivalences characteristic to hemimean are [[128/125]]~[[50/49]] and [[49/45]]~([[25/24]])<sup>2</sup>.  
Line 12: Line 12:


{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 0 -3 | 0 1 0 0 | 0 0 2 5 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 0 -3 | 0 1 0 0 | 0 0 2 5 }}
: Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~56/25
: Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~56/25


Line 22: Line 21:


[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 701.955¢, ~28/25 = 193.650¢
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.955{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.650{{c}}
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.112¢, ~28/25 = 193.717¢
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.112{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.717{{c}}


[[Minimax tuning]]:  
[[Minimax tuning]]:  
Line 36: Line 35:
[[Complexity spectrum]]: 5/4, 7/5, 4/3, 6/5, 8/7, 7/6, 9/8, 10/9, 9/7
[[Complexity spectrum]]: 5/4, 7/5, 4/3, 6/5, 8/7, 7/6, 9/8, 10/9, 9/7


[[Projection pair]]s: 5 3136/625, 7 68841472/9765625 to 2.3.25/7
[[Projection pair]]s: <code>5 3136/625, 7 68841472/9765625</code> to 2.3.25/7


=== Hemimean orion ===
=== Hemimean orion ===
Line 47: Line 46:
Comma list: 1701/1700, 3136/3125
Comma list: 1701/1700, 3136/3125


Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 0 -3 -5 | 0 1 0 0 5 | 0 0 2 5 1 }}
Subgroup-val mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 0 -3 -5 | 0 1 0 0 5 | 0 0 2 5 1 }}


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.196¢, ~28/25 = 193.655¢
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.196{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.655{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.304¢, ~28/25 = 193.737¢
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.304{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.737{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 19g, 31g, …, 87, 99, 217, 229, 316, 328h, 446, 545c, 873cg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 19g, 31g, …, 87, 99, 217, 229, 316, 328h, 446, 545c, 873cg }}
Line 62: Line 61:
Comma list: 476/475, 1216/1215, 1445/1444
Comma list: 476/475, 1216/1215, 1445/1444


Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 0 -3 -5 -6 | 0 1 0 0 5 5 | 0 0 2 5 1 2 }}
Subgroup-val mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 0 -3 -5 -6 | 0 1 0 0 5 5 | 0 0 2 5 1 2 }}


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.132¢, ~19/17 = 193.647¢
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.132{{c}}, ~19/17 = 193.647{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.213¢, ~19/17 = 193.716¢
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.213{{c}}, ~19/17 = 193.716{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19gh, 31gh, …, 87, 99, 118, 210gh, 217, 229, 328h, 446 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 19gh, 31gh, …, 87, 99, 118, 210gh, 217, 229, 328h, 446 }}
Line 79: Line 78:
Comma list: 289/288, 3136/3125
Comma list: 289/288, 3136/3125


Sval mapping: {{mapping| 2 0 0 -6 5 | 0 1 0 0 1 | 0 0 2 5 0 }}
Subgroup-val mapping: {{mapping| 2 0 0 -6 5 | 0 1 0 0 1 | 0 0 2 5 0 }}
 
: mapping generators: ~17/12, ~3, ~56/25
: Sval mapping generators: ~17/12, ~3, ~56/25


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.347¢, ~28/25 = 193.650¢
* CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.347{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.650{{c}}
* CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.218¢, ~28/25 = 193.604¢
* CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.218{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.604{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 30d, 38d, 50, 62, 68, 106d, 118, 248g, 316g }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 30d, 38d, 50, 62, 68, 106d, 118, 248g, 316g }}
Line 99: Line 97:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.509¢, ~19/17 = 193.669¢
* CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.509{{c}}, ~19/17 = 193.669{{c}}
* CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.279¢, ~19/17 = 193.592¢
* CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.279{{c}}, ~19/17 = 193.592{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, …, 50, 68, 106d, 118, 248g, 316g }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, …, 50, 68, 106d, 118, 248g, 316g }}
Line 112: Line 110:


{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 0 -3 -9 | 0 1 0 0 2 | 0 0 2 5 8 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 0 -3 -9 | 0 1 0 0 2 | 0 0 2 5 8 }}
: Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~56/25
: Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~56/25


Line 122: Line 119:


[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 701.720¢, ~28/25 = 193.554¢
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.720{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.554{{c}}
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 701.714¢, ~28/25 = 193.552¢
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.714{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.552{{c}}


[[Minimax tuning]]:  
[[Minimax tuning]]:  
Line 146: Line 143:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 701.822¢, ~28/25 = 193.582¢
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.822{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.582{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 701.835¢, ~28/25 = 193.596¢
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.835{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.596{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 31, 43, 56, 74, 87, 118, 130, 217, 248, 347e, 378, 465, 595e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 31, 43, 56, 74, 87, 118, 130, 217, 248, 347e, 378, 465, 595e }}
Line 161: Line 158:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.567¢, ~28/25 = 193.249¢
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.567{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.249{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.634¢, ~28/25 = 193.293¢
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.634{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.293{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 19e, 31, 56, 68e, 87, 118, 186ef, 205d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 19e, 31, 56, 68e, 87, 118, 186ef, 205d }}
Line 174: Line 171:


{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 0 -3 8 | 0 1 0 0 3 | 0 0 2 5 -8 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 0 -3 8 | 0 1 0 0 3 | 0 0 2 5 -8 }}
: Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~56/25
: Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~56/25


[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 701.164¢, ~28/25 = 193.865¢
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.164{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.865{{c}}
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 701.723¢, ~28/25 = 193.995¢
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.723{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.995{{c}}


[[Minimax tuning]]:  
[[Minimax tuning]]:  
Line 196: Line 192:


{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 2 2 1 | 0 1 2 5 2 | 0 0 -4 -10 -1 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 2 2 1 | 0 1 2 5 2 | 0 0 -4 -10 -1 }}
: Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~18/11
: Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~18/11


[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.288¢, ~18/11 = 854.313¢
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.288{{c}}, ~18/11 = 854.313{{c}}
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.407¢, ~18/11 = 854.350¢
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.407{{c}}, ~18/11 = 854.350{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 24d, 31, 80, 87, 111, 118, 198, 316, 514c, 545c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 24d, 31, 80, 87, 111, 118, 198, 316, 514c, 545c }}
Line 215: Line 210:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.707¢, ~18/11 = 854.537¢
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.707{{c}}, ~18/11 = 854.537{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.937¢, ~18/11 = 854.554¢
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.937{{c}}, ~18/11 = 854.554{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24d, 31, 80, 87, 111, 118, 198 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 24d, 31, 80, 87, 111, 118, 198 }}
Line 228: Line 223:


{{Mapping|legend=1| 2 0 0 -6 -3 | 0 1 0 0 -2 | 0 0 2 5 7 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 2 0 0 -6 -3 | 0 1 0 0 -2 | 0 0 2 5 7 }}
: Mapping generators: ~99/70, ~3, ~56/25
: Mapping generators: ~99/70, ~3, ~56/25


[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
* [[CTE]]: ~99/70 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.002¢, ~28/25 = 193.633¢
* [[CTE]]: ~99/70 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.002{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.633{{c}}
* [[CWE]]: ~99/70 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.135¢, ~28/25 = 193.712¢
* [[CWE]]: ~99/70 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.135{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.712{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198 }}
Line 247: Line 241:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~99/70 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 701.838¢, ~28/25 = 193.671¢
* CTE: ~99/70 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.838{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.671{{c}}
* CWE: ~99/70 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.174¢, ~28/25 = 193.787¢
* CWE: ~99/70 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.174{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.787{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198 }}
Line 262: Line 256:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.108¢, ~28/25 = 193.723¢
* CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.108{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.723{{c}}
* CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.269¢, ~28/25 = 193.776¢
* CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.269{{c}}, ~28/25 = 193.776{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198 }}
Line 277: Line 271:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.252¢, ~19/17 = 193.758¢
* CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.252{{c}}, ~19/17 = 193.758{{c}}
* CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000¢, ~3/2 = 702.355¢, ~19/17 = 193.792¢
* CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.355{{c}}, ~19/17 = 193.792{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198 }}
Line 286: Line 280:
[[Category:Temperament families]]
[[Category:Temperament families]]
[[Category:Hemimean family| ]] <!-- main article -->
[[Category:Hemimean family| ]] <!-- main article -->
[[Category:Hemimean]]
[[Category:Rank 3]]
[[Category:Rank 3]]

Revision as of 12:23, 30 June 2026

This is a list showing technical temperament data. For an explanation of what information is shown here, you may look at the technical data guide for regular temperaments.

The hemimean family of rank-3 temperaments tempers out 3136/3125, the hemimean comma.

The hemimean comma is the difference between the septimal semicomma (126/125) and the septimal kleisma (225/224). This fact alone makes hemimean a very notable rank-3 temperament, as any non-meantone tuning of hemimean will split the syntonic comma (81/80) into two equal parts, each representing 126/125~225/224.

Other equivalences characteristic to hemimean are 128/125~50/49 and 49/45~(25/24)2.

Hemimean

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 3136/3125

Mapping[1 0 0 -3], 0 1 0 0], 0 0 2 5]]

Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~56/25

Mapping to lattice: [0 0 2 5], 0 1 0 0]]

Lattice basis:

28/25 length = 0.5055, 3/2 length = 1.5849
Angle (28/25, 3/2) = 90 degrees

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.955 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.650 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.112 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.717 ¢

Minimax tuning:

[[1 0 0 0, [0 1 0 0, [6/5 0 0 2/5, [0 0 0 1]
Unchanged-interval (eigenmonzo) basis: 2.3.7

Optimal ET sequence12, 19, 31, 68, 80, 87, 99, 217, 229, 328, 347, 446, 675c

Badness (Sintel): 0.706

Complexity spectrum: 5/4, 7/5, 4/3, 6/5, 8/7, 7/6, 9/8, 10/9, 9/7

Projection pairs: 5 3136/625, 7 68841472/9765625 to 2.3.25/7

Hemimean orion

As the second generator of hemimean, 28/25, is close to 19/17, and as the latter is the mediant of 10/9 and 9/8, it is natural to extend hemimean to the 2.3.5.7.17.19 subgroup by tempering out (28/25)/(19/17) = 476/475, or equivalently stated, the semiparticular (5/4)/(19/17)2 = 1445/1444. Notice 3136/3125 = (476/475)(2128/2125) and that 2128/2125 = (1216/1215)(1701/1700), so it makes sense to temper out 1216/1215 and/or 1701/1700 as well. An interesting tuning not in the optimal ET sequence is 111edo. This temperament finds the harmonic 17 and 19 at (+5, +1) and (+5, +2), respectively, with virtually no additional error.

The S-expression-based comma list for the 2.3.5.7.17.19 subgroup extension is {S16/S18, S17/S19, S18/S20(, (S16*S17)/(S19*S20) = S16/S18 * S17/S19 * S18/S20)}.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.17

Comma list: 1701/1700, 3136/3125

Subgroup-val mapping: [1 0 0 -3 -5], 0 1 0 0 5], 0 0 2 5 1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.196 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.655 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.304 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.737 ¢

Optimal ET sequence12, 19g, 31g, …, 87, 99, 217, 229, 316, 328h, 446, 545c, 873cg

Badness (Sintel): 0.884

2.3.5.7.17.19 subgroup

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.17.19

Comma list: 476/475, 1216/1215, 1445/1444

Subgroup-val mapping: [1 0 0 -3 -5 -6], 0 1 0 0 5 5], 0 0 2 5 1 2]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.132 ¢, ~19/17 = 193.647 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.213 ¢, ~19/17 = 193.716 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 12, 19gh, 31gh, …, 87, 99, 118, 210gh, 217, 229, 328h, 446

Badness (Sintel): 0.578

Semiorion

Semiorion is an alternative subgroup extension of lower complexity, which splits the octave into two. The S-expression-based comma list for the 2.3.5.7.17.19 subgroup extension is {S17, S19, S16/S18(, S18/S20, 476/475 = S16/S20 * S17/S19)}.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.17

Comma list: 289/288, 3136/3125

Subgroup-val mapping: [2 0 0 -6 5], 0 1 0 0 1], 0 0 2 5 0]]

mapping generators: ~17/12, ~3, ~56/25

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.347 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.650 ¢
  • CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.218 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.604 ¢

Optimal ET sequence12, 30d, 38d, 50, 62, 68, 106d, 118, 248g, 316g

Badness (Sintel): 1.690

2.3.5.7.17.19 subgroup

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.17.19

Comma list: 289/288, 361/360, 476/475

Mapping: [2 0 0 -6 5 3], 0 1 0 0 1 1], 0 0 2 5 0 1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.509 ¢, ~19/17 = 193.669 ¢
  • CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.279 ¢, ~19/17 = 193.592 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 12, …, 50, 68, 106d, 118, 248g, 316g

Badness (Sintel): 0.722

Belobog

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 441/440, 3136/3125

Mapping[1 0 0 -3 -9], 0 1 0 0 2], 0 0 2 5 8]]

Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~56/25

Mapping to lattice: [0 -2 2 5 4], 0 -1 0 0 -2]]

Lattice basis:

28/25 length = 0.3829, 16/15 length = 1.1705
Angle (28/25, 16/15) = 93.2696

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.720 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.554 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.714 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.552 ¢

Minimax tuning:

[[1 0 0 0 0, [27/22 6/11 -5/22 -3/11 5/22, [24/11 -4/11 -2/11 2/11 2/11, [27/11 -10/11 -5/11 5/11 5/11, [24/11 -4/11 -13/11 2/11 13/11]
Unchanged-interval (eigenmonzo) basis: 2.9/7.11/5

Optimal ET sequence12, 19e, 31, 68e, 87, 99e, 118, 130, 217, 248

Badness (Sintel): 0.732

Projection pairs: 5 3136/625, 7 68841472/9765625, 11 1700108992512/152587890625 to 2.3.25/7

Scales: belobog31

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 441/440, 1001/1000, 3136/3125

Mapping: [1 0 0 -3 -9 15], 0 1 0 0 2 -2], 0 0 2 5 8 -7]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.822 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.582 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.835 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.596 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 31, 43, 56, 74, 87, 118, 130, 217, 248, 347e, 378, 465, 595e

Badness (Sintel): 1.034

Bellowblog

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 196/195, 352/351, 625/624

Mapping: [1 0 0 -3 -9 -4], 0 1 0 0 2 -1], 0 0 2 5 8 8]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.567 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.249 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.634 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.293 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 12f, 19e, 31, 56, 68e, 87, 118, 186ef, 205d

Badness (Sintel): 1.183

Siebog

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 540/539, 3136/3125

Mapping[1 0 0 -3 8], 0 1 0 0 3], 0 0 2 5 -8]]

Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~56/25

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.164 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.865 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.723 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.995 ¢

Minimax tuning:

[[1 0 0 0 0, [0 1 0 0 0, [8/5 3/5 1/5 0 -1/5, [1 3/2 1/2 0 -1/2, [8/5 3/5 -4/5 0 4/5]
Unchanged-interval (eigenmonzo) basis: 2.3.11/5

Optimal ET sequence12e, 18e, 19, 31, 68e, 80, 99e, 130, 210e, 241, 340ce, 371ce, 470cdee, 501cde, 581cdee, 711ccdee

Badness (Sintel): 1.045

Triglav

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 3025/3024, 3136/3125

Mapping[1 0 2 2 1], 0 1 2 5 2], 0 0 -4 -10 -1]]

Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~18/11

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.288 ¢, ~18/11 = 854.313 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.407 ¢, ~18/11 = 854.350 ¢

Optimal ET sequence24d, 31, 80, 87, 111, 118, 198, 316, 514c, 545c

Badness (Sintel): 0.984

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 352/351, 1001/1000, 3025/3024

Mapping: [1 0 2 2 1 6], 0 1 2 5 2 -1], 0 0 -4 -10 -1 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.707 ¢, ~18/11 = 854.537 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.937 ¢, ~18/11 = 854.554 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 24d, 31, 80, 87, 111, 118, 198

Badness (Sintel): 1.159

Semihemimean

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 3136/3125, 9801/9800

Mapping[2 0 0 -6 -3], 0 1 0 0 -2], 0 0 2 5 7]]

Mapping generators: ~99/70, ~3, ~56/25

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~99/70 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.002 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.633 ¢
  • CWE: ~99/70 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.135 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.712 ¢

Optimal ET sequence12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198

Badness (Sintel): 1.787

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 1001/1000, 3136/3125, 4459/4455

Mapping: [2 0 0 -6 -3 15], 0 1 0 0 -2 2], 0 0 2 5 7 -6]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~99/70 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.838 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.671 ¢
  • CWE: ~99/70 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.174 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.787 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198

Badness (Sintel): 1.550

17-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17

Comma list: 289/288, 561/560, 1001/1000, 1632/1625

Mapping: [2 0 0 -6 -3 15 5], 0 1 0 0 -2 2 1], 0 0 2 5 7 -6 0]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.108 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.723 ¢
  • CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.269 ¢, ~28/25 = 193.776 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198

Badness (Sintel): 1.743

19-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19

Comma list: 289/288, 361/360, 456/455, 476/475, 561/560

Mapping: [2 0 0 -6 -3 15 5 3], 0 1 0 0 -2 2 1 1], 0 0 2 5 7 -6 0 1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~17/12 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.252 ¢, ~19/17 = 193.758 ¢
  • CWE: ~17/12 = 600.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.355 ¢, ~19/17 = 193.792 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 12, 50, 68, 80, 118, 130, 198

Badness (Sintel): 1.318