Xenwolf
Joined 17 September 2018
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 655: | Line 655: | ||
:: Okay, let me look at this comma some and see what I can find out. I already can tell that this comma is relevant considering that it involves the whole 11-limit. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC) | :: Okay, let me look at this comma some and see what I can find out. I already can tell that this comma is relevant considering that it involves the whole 11-limit. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: So, I just ran the numbers through Wolfram Alpha, and it seems that 6250/6237 is tempered out by both 53edo and 159edo despite their differing patent vals for both 7 and 11. It also seems that 6250/6237 is only slightly smaller than Mercator's comma at 3.60472 cents. It also appears that when this comma is tempered out, the difference between [[50/16]] (an octave plus [[25/16]]) and [[231/128]] (a stack consisting of [[3/2]] and [[77/64]]) is equated with a stack of three 6/5 minor thirds. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Comma Tables on 53edo and 159edo pages == | == Comma Tables on 53edo and 159edo pages == | ||
Hey, Xenwolf, I've been trying to go through the list of commas to find out which commas are tempered out by 53edo and 159edo, and I'm starting to think that a comma table would be useful for both pages. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC) | Hey, Xenwolf, I've been trying to go through the list of commas to find out which commas are tempered out by 53edo and 159edo, and I'm starting to think that a comma table would be useful for both pages. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC) |