Biyatismic clan: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m Cleanup
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Technical data page}}
{{Technical data page}}
The '''biyatismic clan''' of [[Rank-3 temperament|rank-3]] [[Temperament|temperaments]] [[Tempering out|tempers out]] the [[biyatisma]], 121/120 = {{monzo| -3 -1 -1 0 2 }}.
The '''biyatismic clan''' of [[rank-3 temperament|rank-3]] [[regular temperament|temperaments]] [[tempering out|tempers out]] the biyatisma, [[121/120]].


Temperaments discussed elsewhere are:  
Temperaments discussed elsewhere are:  
Line 16: Line 16:


{{Mapping|legend=2| 1 0 1 2 | 0 1 1 1 | 0 0 -2 -1 }}
{{Mapping|legend=2| 1 0 1 2 | 0 1 1 1 | 0 0 -2 -1 }}
: mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~11/10


: Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~11/10
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.4578{{c}}, ~11/10 = 157.7466{{c}}
 
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.4578, ~11/10 = 157.7466


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 15, 22, 31, 46, 53, 137e, 183ee, 190ee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 15, 22, 31, 46, 53, 137e, 183ee, 190ee }}


[[Badness]]: 0.0297 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]] (Smith): 0.0297 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


== Zeus ==
== Zeus ==
Line 41: Line 40:
: Angle (11/10, 11/8) = 87.464 degrees
: Angle (11/10, 11/8) = 87.464 degrees


[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 702.1530, ~11/10 = 157.0881
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.1530{{c}}, ~11/10 = 157.0881{{c}}


[[Minimax tuning]]:  
[[Minimax tuning]]:  
* [[11-odd-limit]]
* [[11-odd-limit]]
: [{{monzo| 1 0 0 0 0 }}, {{monzo| 11/9 10/9 -1/3 -2/9 0 }}, {{monzo| 22/9 2/9 1/3 -4/9 0 }}, {{monzo| 22/9 2/9 -2/3 5/9 0 }}, {{monzo| 10/3 2/3 0 -1/3 0 }}]
: [{{monzo| 1 0 0 0 0 }}, {{monzo| 11/9 10/9 -1/3 -2/9 0 }}, {{monzo| 22/9 2/9 1/3 -4/9 0 }}, {{monzo| 22/9 2/9 -2/3 5/9 0 }}, {{monzo| 10/3 2/3 0 -1/3 0 }}]
: [[Eigenmonzo basis|unchanged-interval (eigenmonzo) basis]]: 2.9/5.9/7
: [[eigenmonzo basis|unchanged-interval (eigenmonzo) basis]]: 2.9/5.9/7


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 15, 22, 31, 46, 53, 68, 77, 99, 130e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 15, 22, 31, 46, 53, 68, 77, 99, 130e }}


[[Badness]]: 0.400 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]] (Smith): 0.400 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


[[Projection pair]]s: 5 600/121 7 2662/375 11 120/11 to 2.3.11/5
[[Projection pair]]s: 5 600/121 7 2662/375 11 120/11 to 2.3.11/5
Line 77: Line 76:
: Angle (11/10, 11/8) = 106.7439 degrees
: Angle (11/10, 11/8) = 106.7439 degrees


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.8679, ~11/10 = 156.9582
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.8679{{c}}, ~11/10 = 156.9582{{c}}


Minimax tuning:  
Minimax tuning:  
Line 89: Line 88:
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 15, 22, 31, 46, 53, 77, 99, 130e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 15, 22, 31, 46, 53, 77, 99, 130e }}


Badness: 0.934 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness (Smith): 0.934 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


Projection pairs: 5 600/121 7 2662/375 11 120/11 13 1280/99 to 2.3.11/5
Projection pairs: 5 600/121 7 2662/375 11 120/11 13 1280/99 to 2.3.11/5
Line 103: Line 102:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 4 2 2 | 0 1 1 -1 1 1 | 0 0 -2 3 -1 -1 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 4 2 2 | 0 1 1 -1 1 1 | 0 0 -2 3 -1 -1 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 699.3420, ~11/10 = 155.3666
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 699.3420{{c}}, ~11/10 = 155.3666{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 9, 15, 22f, 24, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 9, 15, 22f, 24, 31 }}


Badness: 0.808 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness (Smith): 0.808 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


== Artemis ==
== Artemis ==
Line 118: Line 117:
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 1 -3 2 | 0 1 1 4 1 | 0 0 -2 -4 -1 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 1 -3 2 | 0 1 1 4 1 | 0 0 -2 -4 -1 }}


[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 699.8719, ~11/10 = 158.3232
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 699.8719{{c}}, ~11/10 = 158.3232{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 9, 15d, 16d, 20, 22, 31, 53, 82e, 84e, 113e, 144ee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 9, 15d, 16d, 20, 22, 31, 53, 82e, 84e, 113e, 144ee }}
Line 129: Line 128:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 -3 2 -5 | 0 1 1 4 1 6 | 0 0 -2 -4 -1 -6 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 -3 2 -5 | 0 1 1 4 1 6 | 0 0 -2 -4 -1 -6 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 698.7090, ~11/10 = 158.7117
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 698.7090{{c}}, ~11/10 = 158.7117{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 9, 20, 22f, 29, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 20, 22f, 29, 31 }}


=== Diana ===
=== Diana ===
Line 140: Line 139:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 -3 2 7 | 0 1 1 4 1 -2 | 0 0 -2 -4 -1 -1 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 -3 2 7 | 0 1 1 4 1 -2 | 0 0 -2 -4 -1 -1 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 700.9789, ~11/10 = 159.0048
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 700.9789{{c}}, ~11/10 = 159.0048{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 22, 29, 31, 53, 82e, 84e, 113e, 166ee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 22, 29, 31, 53, 82e, 84e, 113e, 166ee }}


== Oxpecker ==
== Oxpecker ==
Line 151: Line 150:
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 1 2 2 | 0 1 1 1 1 | 0 0 -2 -6 -1 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 1 2 2 | 0 1 1 1 1 | 0 0 -2 -6 -1 }}


[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 700.8882, ~11/10 = 155.7756
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 700.8882{{c}}, ~11/10 = 155.7756{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7d, 8d, 15, 23de, 24d, 31, 46, 77 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7d, 8d, 15, 23de, 24d, 31, 46, 77 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.699 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]] (Smith): 0.699 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


=== Woodpecker ===
=== Woodpecker ===
Line 164: Line 163:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 2 2 2 | 0 1 1 1 1 1 | 0 0 -2 -6 -1 1 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 2 2 2 | 0 1 1 1 1 1 | 0 0 -2 -6 -1 1 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.5946, ~11/10 = 154.8652
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.5946{{c}}, ~11/10 = 154.8652{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7d, 8d, 15, 23de, 24d, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 8d, 15, 23de, 24d, 31 }}


Badness: 1.093 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness (Smith): 1.093 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


== Aphrodite ==
== Aphrodite ==
Line 179: Line 178:


{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 1 3 | 0 1 1 0 | 0 0 -4 -3 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 1 3 | 0 1 1 0 | 0 0 -4 -3 }}
: mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~21/20


: Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~21/20
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 700.2144{{c}}, ~21/20 = 78.5694{{c}}
 
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 700.2144, ~21/20 = 78.5694


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 14c, 15, 29, 31, 46, 60, 77, 91, 122, 137d, 168d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 14c, 15, 29, 31, 46, 60, 77, 91, 122, 137d, 168d }}


[[Badness]]: 0.943 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]] (Smith): 0.943 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


[[Projection pair]]s: 5 320000/64827 7 64000/9261 to 2.3.7/5
[[Projection pair]]s: 5 320000/64827 7 64000/9261 to 2.3.7/5
Line 196: Line 194:


{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 1 3 2 | 0 1 1 0 1 | 0 0 -4 -3 -2 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 0 1 3 2 | 0 1 1 0 1 | 0 0 -4 -3 -2 }}
: mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~22/21


: Mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~22/21
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 700.3200{{c}}, ~21/20 = 78.6421{{c}}
 
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 700.3200, ~21/20 = 78.6421


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 14c, 15, 29, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 91e, 137de, 168dee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 14c, 15, 29, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 91e, 137de, 168dee }}


[[Badness]]: 0.583 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]] (Smith): 0.583 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


==== 13-limit ====
==== 13-limit ====
Line 212: Line 209:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 3 2 6 | 0 1 1 0 1 -1 | 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -11 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 3 2 6 | 0 1 1 0 1 -1 | 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -11 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 700.1158, ~21/20 = 78.5211
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 700.1158{{c}}, ~21/20 = 78.5211{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 14cf, 31, 45ef, 46, 77, 122ee, 137def, 168deef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14cf, 31, 45ef, 46, 77, 122ee, 137def, 168deef }}


Badness: 1.456 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness (Smith): 1.456 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


==== Eros ====
==== Eros ====
Line 227: Line 224:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 3 2 7 | 0 1 1 0 1 -2 | 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -2 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 3 2 7 | 0 1 1 0 1 -2 | 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -2 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.5014, ~21/20 = 78.6143
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.5014{{c}}, ~21/20 = 78.6143{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 17c, 29, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 106de, 183dee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17c, 29, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 106de, 183dee }}


Badness: 1.150 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness (Smith): 1.150 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


===== 17-limit =====
===== 17-limit =====
Line 243: Line 240:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.9299, ~22/21 = 78.2539
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.9299{{c}}, ~22/21 = 78.2539{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.7925, ~22/21 = 78.6203
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.7925{{c}}, ~22/21 = 78.6203{{c}}


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 106de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 106de }}


Badness:  
Badness:  
* Smith: 0.979 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
* Smith: 0.979 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
* Dirichlet: 0.931
* Sintel: 0.931


===== 19-limit =====
===== 19-limit =====
Line 260: Line 257:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.5642, ~22/21 = 78.2353
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.5642{{c}}, ~22/21 = 78.2353{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 701.6963, ~22/21 = 78.6479
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.6963{{c}}, ~22/21 = 78.6479{{c}}


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 75dfgh, 77, 106de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 75dfgh, 77, 106de }}


Badness:  
Badness:  
* Smith: 1.13 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
* Smith: 1.13 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
* Dirichlet: 1.159
* Sintel: 1.159


===== 23-limit =====
===== 23-limit =====
Line 277: Line 274:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1\1, ~3 = 1901.7115, ~23/22 = 78.2054
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.7115{{c}}, ~23/22 = 78.2054{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1\1, ~3 = 1901.8010, ~23/22 = 78.7188
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 701.8010{{c}}, ~23/22 = 78.7188{{c}}


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 75dfgh, 77, 106de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 75dfgh, 77, 106de }}


Badness:  
Badness:  
* Smith: 0.939 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
* Smith: 0.939 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
* Dirichlet: 1.084
* Sintel: 1.084


==== Inanna ====
==== Inanna ====
Line 293: Line 290:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 3 2 1 | 0 1 1 0 1 2 | 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -7 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 3 2 1 | 0 1 1 0 1 2 | 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -7 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 698.7754, ~21/20 = 79.6096
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 698.7754{{c}}, ~21/20 = 79.6096{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 14cf, 15, 29, 31, 45ef, 60e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14cf, 15, 29, 31, 45ef, 60e }}


Badness: 1.077 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness (Sintel): 1.077 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


==== Ishtar ====
==== Ishtar ====
Line 306: Line 303:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 3 2 -1 | 0 1 1 0 1 3 | 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 0 1 3 2 -1 | 0 1 1 0 1 3 | 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 703.3952, ~21/20 = 78.9578
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 703.3952{{c}}, ~21/20 = 78.9578{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 14cf, 15, 17c, 29, 31f, 46, 106deff, 121def }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14cf, 15, 17c, 29, 31f, 46, 106deff, 121def }}


Badness: 1.151 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness (Sintel): 1.151 × 10<sup>-3</sup>


== Notes ==
== Notes ==

Revision as of 12:52, 30 November 2025

This is a list showing technical temperament data. For an explanation of what information is shown here, you may look at the technical data guide for regular temperaments.

The biyatismic clan of rank-3 temperaments tempers out the biyatisma, 121/120.

Temperaments discussed elsewhere are:

Considered below are zeus, artemis, oxpecker, aphrodite, and the no-7 subgroup temperament, protomere. For the rank-4 biyatismic temperament, see Rank-4 temperament #Biyatismic (121/120).

Protomere

Subgroup: 2.3.5.11

Comma list: 121/120

Subgroup-val mapping[1 0 1 2], 0 1 1 1], 0 0 -2 -1]]

mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~11/10

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.4578 ¢, ~11/10 = 157.7466 ¢

Optimal ET sequence7, 15, 22, 31, 46, 53, 137e, 183ee, 190ee

Badness (Smith): 0.0297 × 10-3

Zeus

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 121/120, 176/175

Mapping[1 0 1 4 2], 0 1 1 -1 1], 0 0 -2 3 1]]

Mapping to lattice: [0 1 -1 2 0], 0 1 1 -1 1]]

Lattice basis:

11/10, 11/8
Angle (11/10, 11/8) = 87.464 degrees

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 702.1530 ¢, ~11/10 = 157.0881 ¢

Minimax tuning:

[[1 0 0 0 0, [11/9 10/9 -1/3 -2/9 0, [22/9 2/9 1/3 -4/9 0, [22/9 2/9 -2/3 5/9 0, [10/3 2/3 0 -1/3 0]
unchanged-interval (eigenmonzo) basis: 2.9/5.9/7

Optimal ET sequence15, 22, 31, 46, 53, 68, 77, 99, 130e

Badness (Smith): 0.400 × 10-3

Projection pairs: 5 600/121 7 2662/375 11 120/11 to 2.3.11/5

Zeus11[22] hobbit transversal

33/32, 16/15, 11/10, 8/7, 64/55, 77/64, 5/4, 14/11, 4/3,
11/8, 45/32, 16/11, 3/2, 11/7, 8/5, 5/3, 55/32, 7/4,
11/6, 15/8, 64/33, 2

Zeus11[24] hobbit transversal

33/32, 16/15, 11/10, 9/8, 8/7, 77/64, 11/9, 5/4, 21/16, 4/3,
11/8, 45/32, 16/11, 3/2, 32/21, 8/5, 18/11, 5/3, 7/4, 16/9,
11/6, 15/8, 64/33, 2

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 121/120, 176/175, 351/350

Mapping: [1 0 1 4 2 7], 0 1 1 -1 1 -2], 0 0 -2 3 -1 -1]]

Mapping to lattice: [0 1 -1 2 0 -3], 0 1 1 -1 1 -2]]

Lattice basis:

11/10 length = 0.7898, 11/8 length = 1.002
Angle (11/10, 11/8) = 106.7439 degrees

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.8679 ¢, ~11/10 = 156.9582 ¢

Minimax tuning:

  • 13-odd-limit
[[1 0 0 0 0 0, [11/9 10/9 -1/3 -2/9 0 0, [22/9 2/9 1/3 -4/9 0 0, [22/9 2/9 -2/3 5/9 0 0, [10/3 2/3 0 -1/3 0 0, [14/3 -8/3 1 1/3 0 0]
unchanged-interval (eigenmonzo) basis: 2.9/5.9/7
  • 15-odd-limit
[[1 0 0 0 0 0, [0 1 0 0 0 0, [11/5 1/5 2/5 -2/5 0 0, [11/5 1/5 -3/5 3/5 0 0, [13/5 3/5 1/5 -1/5 0 0, [38/5 -12/5 1/5 -1/5 0 0]
unchanged-interval (eigenmonzo) basis: 2.3.7/5

Optimal ET sequence15, 22, 31, 46, 53, 77, 99, 130e

Badness (Smith): 0.934 × 10-3

Projection pairs: 5 600/121 7 2662/375 11 120/11 13 1280/99 to 2.3.11/5

Zeus13[22] hobbit transversal

260/243, 88/81, 11/10, 44/39, 162/143, 11/9, 16/13, 320/243, 4/3, 1040/729, 13/9, 729/520, 3/2, 99/65, 44/27, 18/11, 1280/729, 16/9, 11/6, 24/13, 243/130, 2

Tinia

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 66/65, 121/120, 176/175

Mapping: [1 0 1 4 2 2], 0 1 1 -1 1 1], 0 0 -2 3 -1 -1]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 699.3420 ¢, ~11/10 = 155.3666 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 9, 15, 22f, 24, 31

Badness (Smith): 0.808 × 10-3

Artemis

Named by Graham Breed in 2011, artemis was found to be locally efficient in the higher limits among rank-3 extensions of marvel[1], although it is a weak extension. However, the alternative 13-limit extension called diana is more accurate.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 121/120, 225/224

Mapping[1 0 1 -3 2], 0 1 1 4 1], 0 0 -2 -4 -1]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 699.8719 ¢, ~11/10 = 158.3232 ¢

Optimal ET sequence9, 15d, 16d, 20, 22, 31, 53, 82e, 84e, 113e, 144ee

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 105/104, 121/120, 196/195

Mapping: [1 0 1 -3 2 -5], 0 1 1 4 1 6], 0 0 -2 -4 -1 -6]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 698.7090 ¢, ~11/10 = 158.7117 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 9, 20, 22f, 29, 31

Diana

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 121/120, 225/224, 275/273

Mapping: [1 0 1 -3 2 7], 0 1 1 4 1 -2], 0 0 -2 -4 -1 -1]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.9789 ¢, ~11/10 = 159.0048 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 22, 29, 31, 53, 82e, 84e, 113e, 166ee

Oxpecker

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 121/120, 126/125

Mapping[1 0 1 2 2], 0 1 1 1 1], 0 0 -2 -6 -1]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.8882 ¢, ~11/10 = 155.7756 ¢

Optimal ET sequence7d, 8d, 15, 23de, 24d, 31, 46, 77

Badness (Smith): 0.699 × 10-3

Woodpecker

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 66/65, 121/120, 126/125

Mapping: [1 0 1 2 2 2], 0 1 1 1 1 1], 0 0 -2 -6 -1 1]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.5946 ¢, ~11/10 = 154.8652 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7d, 8d, 15, 23de, 24d, 31

Badness (Smith): 1.093 × 10-3

Aphrodite

Aphrodite tempers out the squalentine comma, 64827/64000, in the 7-limit. Its generators can be taken to be 2, 3, and 21/20, and it equates (21/20)3 with 8/7.

7-limit (squalentine)

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 64827/64000

Mapping[1 0 1 3], 0 1 1 0], 0 0 -4 -3]]

mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~21/20

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.2144 ¢, ~21/20 = 78.5694 ¢

Optimal ET sequence14c, 15, 29, 31, 46, 60, 77, 91, 122, 137d, 168d

Badness (Smith): 0.943 × 10-3

Projection pairs: 5 320000/64827 7 64000/9261 to 2.3.7/5

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 121/120, 441/440

Mapping[1 0 1 3 2], 0 1 1 0 1], 0 0 -4 -3 -2]]

mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~22/21

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.3200 ¢, ~21/20 = 78.6421 ¢

Optimal ET sequence14c, 15, 29, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 91e, 137de, 168dee

Badness (Smith): 0.583 × 10-3

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 121/120, 351/350, 441/440

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 6], 0 1 1 0 1 -1], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -11]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 700.1158 ¢, ~21/20 = 78.5211 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 14cf, 31, 45ef, 46, 77, 122ee, 137def, 168deef

Badness (Smith): 1.456 × 10-3

Eros

Eros fairs impressively into the 23-limit as a rank 3 temperament; not only is it fairly simple (considering this is a subgroup as complex as the full 23-limit, with many challenges) but all the generators are positive (or only 1 into the negatives in the case of the fifth) meaning it's even simpler than it might appear and has the pleasing property of all harmonics and subharmonics being "on the same side"; specifically: -3 to 1 fifths (2L 3s) and -5 to 0 ~23/22's will get you every prime, up to octave equivalence; you can think of this as a 5 by 6 grid if you like and is a recommendable place to start looking at its structure. Tempering the less accurate comma S11 can be seen as a consequence of tempering {S21, S22, S23} so is very natural and given its properties certainly excusable. Therefore characteristic of any good tuning is the ~11 being the most flat prime, with other primes having strictly less than 5 ¢ of error. This temperament was first logged on x31eq by Scott Dakota.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 121/120, 196/195, 352/351

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 7], 0 1 1 0 1 -2], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -2]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.5014 ¢, ~21/20 = 78.6143 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 17c, 29, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 106de, 183dee

Badness (Smith): 1.150 × 10-3

17-limit

Note that this extension requires the 29g val for 29edo, which has the sizes of 17/16 and 18/17 swapped.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17

Comma list: 121/120, 154/153, 196/195, 352/351

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 7 6], 0 1 1 0 1 -2 -1], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -2 -5]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.9299 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.2539 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.7925 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.6203 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 77, 106de

Badness:

  • Smith: 0.979 × 10-3
  • Sintel: 0.931
19-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19

Comma list: 121/120, 154/153, 196/195, 286/285, 352/351

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 7 6 9], 0 1 1 0 1 -2 -1 -3], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -2 -5 0]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.5642 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.2353 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.6963 ¢, ~22/21 = 78.6479 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 75dfgh, 77, 106de

Badness:

  • Smith: 1.13 × 10-3
  • Sintel: 1.159
23-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19.23

Comma list: 121/120, 154/153, 161/160, 196/195, 286/285, 352/351

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 7 6 9 3], 0 1 1 0 1 -2 -1 -3 1], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -2 -5 0 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.7115 ¢, ~23/22 = 78.2054 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 701.8010 ¢, ~23/22 = 78.7188 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 17cg, 29g, 31, 46, 60e, 75dfgh, 77, 106de

Badness:

  • Smith: 0.939 × 10-3
  • Sintel: 1.084

Inanna

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 105/104, 121/120, 275/273

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 1], 0 1 1 0 1 2], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -7]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 698.7754 ¢, ~21/20 = 79.6096 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 14cf, 15, 29, 31, 45ef, 60e

Badness (Sintel): 1.077 × 10-3

Ishtar

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 91/90, 121/120, 441/440

Mapping: [1 0 1 3 2 -1], 0 1 1 0 1 3], 0 0 -4 -3 -2 -1]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~3/2 = 703.3952 ¢, ~21/20 = 78.9578 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 14cf, 15, 17c, 29, 31f, 46, 106deff, 121def

Badness (Sintel): 1.151 × 10-3

Notes