TAMNAMS: Difference between revisions

Line 405:

[[Machine]] is the 5&6 temperament in the 2.9.7.11 subgroup with a comma list of 64/63 and 99/98.

Its list of EDO tunings is {{ val list | 5, 6, (5+5=10e,) 11, 12, 16, 17, (5+10e+12=21be,) 22, 23, (5+5+5+5+6=26qe,) 27, 28, 33 }} with non-patent val EDOs in brackets but included for demonstrating virtual completeness of the tuning range and the unusually large [[33edo]] tuning being to show [[11edo]'s strength as a tuning.

Its list of EDO tunings is {{ val list | 5, 6, (5+5=10e,) 11, 12, 16, 17, (5+10e+12=21be,) 22, 23, (5+5+5+5+6=26qe,) 27, 28, 33 }} with non-patent val EDOs in brackets but included for demonstrating virtual completeness of the tuning range and the unusually large [[33edo]] tuning being to show [[11edo]]'s strength as a tuning.

==== Onyx (1L 6s) ====

"1Ln-ic's" and "nL1-ic's (like, the -ic suffix applied to MOSS names, collectivised for 1Lns and nL1s) sounds like "one-el-en-ics" or "en-el-one-ics" which abbreviated sort of sounds like "one-ics" => "onyx". Then "onyx" sounds sort of like "one-six". Furthermore the onyx mineral comes in many colours and types, which seems fitting given this is the parent scale for a wide variety of MOSSes; specifically of interest being 7L 1s (pine), 8L 1s (subneutralic) and 9L 1s (sinatonic). Finally, the name "onyx" is also supposed to be vaguely reminiscent of "anti-archaeotonic" as "chi" (the greek letter) is written like an "x" (this is related to why "christmas" is abbreviated sometimes as "X-mas") and other than that, the letters "o" and "n" and their sounds are also present in "archaeotonic", and "x" is vaguely reminiscent of negation and multiplication. There is also something like a "y" sound in "archaeotonic" in the "aeo" part (depending partially on your pronounciation).

@@ Line 405: / Line 405: @@
 [[Machine]] is the 5&6 temperament in the 2.9.7.11 subgroup with a comma list of 64/63 and 99/98.
-Its list of EDO tunings is {{ val list | 5, 6, (5+5=10e,) 11, 12, 16, 17, (5+10e+12=21be,) 22, 23, (5+5+5+5+6=26qe,) 27, 28, 33 }} with non-patent val EDOs in brackets but included for demonstrating virtual completeness of the tuning range and the unusually large [[33edo]] tuning being to show [[11edo]'s strength as a tuning.
+Its list of EDO tunings is {{ val list | 5, 6, (5+5=10e,) 11, 12, 16, 17, (5+10e+12=21be,) 22, 23, (5+5+5+5+6=26qe,) 27, 28, 33 }} with non-patent val EDOs in brackets but included for demonstrating virtual completeness of the tuning range and the unusually large [[33edo]] tuning being to show [[11edo]]'s strength as a tuning.
 ==== Onyx (1L 6s) ====
 "1Ln-ic's" and "nL1-ic's (like, the -ic suffix applied to MOSS names, collectivised for 1Lns and nL1s) sounds like "one-el-en-ics" or "en-el-one-ics" which abbreviated sort of sounds like "one-ics" => "onyx". Then "onyx" sounds sort of like "one-six". Furthermore the onyx mineral comes in many colours and types, which seems fitting given this is the parent scale for a wide variety of MOSSes; specifically of interest being 7L 1s (pine), 8L 1s (subneutralic) and 9L 1s (sinatonic). Finally, the name "onyx" is also supposed to be vaguely reminiscent of "anti-archaeotonic" as "chi" (the greek letter) is written like an "x" (this is related to why "christmas" is abbreviated sometimes as "X-mas") and other than that, the letters "o" and "n" and their sounds are also present in "archaeotonic", and "x" is vaguely reminiscent of negation and multiplication. There is also something like a "y" sound in "archaeotonic" in the "aeo" part (depending partially on your pronounciation).