Rastmic clan: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Cleanup. - gencom (trivial)
Switch to Sintel's badness, WE & CWE tunings, per community consensus
Line 21: Line 21:
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 17, 24, 65, 89, 202, 291, 380 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 17, 24, 65, 89, 202, 291, 380 }}


[[Tp tuning #T2 tuning|RMS error]]: 0.3021 cents
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 0.0700


Scales: [[neutral7]], [[neutral10]], [[neutral17]]
Scales: [[neutral7]], [[neutral10]], [[neutral17]]


=== Namo ===
=== Namo ===
Namo adds [[144/143]] to the comma list and finds ~[[16/13]] at the same neutral third. With {{nowrap|11/9 ~ 16/13}}, it requires a slightly flat ~[[27/22]] as the tuning of the neutral third. [[58edo]] is the largest [[patent val]] tuning for it in the [[optimal ET sequence]], with a tuning between that of [[17edo]] and [[41edo]], so that ~11 and ~13 are practically equally sharp, given that [[29edo]] forms a [[consistent circle]] of [[13/11]]'s with a [[closing error]] of 31.2%. It might be recommended as a tuning for this reason, as having the neutral third much sharper to optimize plausibility of ~16/13 implies that the 11 is extremely sharp because 11/9 must be tuned sharp so that 11 must be sharper than 9, which is thus four times as sharp as however sharp of the (3/2)<sup>1/2</sup> neutral third is, while tuning it much flatter means that you increase the error of 16/13, which in 58edo is already as almost 8{{cent}} off and in [[99edo|99ef]] it is only slightly worse. For these reasons, Godtone is not fond of the recommendations by the various [[optimal tuning]]s to tune flat of 58edo, although it is clear that in an optimal tuning nothing much sharper than 58edo should be used, as making 11 more off than 13 would imply damaging 3 and 11/9 more than necessary. Curiously, [[POTE]] recommends a sharper tuning than both [[CTE]] and [[CWE]] here, but still flat of 58edo.
Namo adds [[144/143]] to the comma list and finds ~[[16/13]] at the same neutral third. With 11/9~16/13, it requires a slightly flat ~[[27/22]] as the tuning of the neutral third. [[58edo]] is the largest [[patent val]] tuning for it in the [[optimal ET sequence]], with a tuning between that of [[17edo]] and [[41edo]], so that ~11 and ~13 are practically equally sharp, given that [[29edo]] forms a [[consistent circle]] of [[13/11]]'s with a [[closing error]] of 31.2%. It might be recommended as a tuning for this reason, as having the neutral third much sharper to optimize plausibility of ~16/13 implies that the 11 is extremely sharp because 11/9 must be tuned sharp so that 11 must be sharper than 9, which is thus four times as sharp as however sharp of the (3/2)<sup>1/2</sup> neutral third is, while tuning it much flatter means that you increase the error of 16/13, which in 58edo is already as almost 8{{cent}} off and in [[99edo|99ef]] it is only slightly worse. For these reasons, Godtone is not fond of the recommendations by the various [[optimal tuning]]s to tune flat of 58edo, although it is clear that in an optimal tuning nothing much sharper than 58edo should be used, as making 11 more off than 13 would imply damaging 3 and 11/9 more than necessary. Curiously, [[POTE]] (351.488{{c}}) recommends a sharper tuning than [[CWE]] here, but still flat of 58edo.


[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.11.13
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.11.13
Line 36: Line 36:
{{Mapping|legend=3| 1 1 0 0 2 4 | 0 2 0 0 5 -1 }}
{{Mapping|legend=3| 1 1 0 0 2 4 | 0 2 0 0 5 -1 }}


[[Optimal tuning]]s:
[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
* [[CTE]]: 2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 350.746{{c}}
* [[WE]]: ~2 = 1198.8553{{c}}, ~11/9 = 351.1523{{c}}
* [[CWE]]: 2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 351.270{{c}}
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 351.2700{{c}}
* [[POTE]]: 2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 351.488{{c}}
<!-- * [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 350.746{{c}}
* [[POTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 351.488{{c}} -->


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 10, 17, 24, 41, 58, 99ef, 239eefff, 338eeeffff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 10, 17, 41, 58, 99ef, 239eefff, 338eeeffff }}


[[Tp tuning #T2 tuning|RMS error]]: 0.7038 cents
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 0.133


== Suhajira ==
== Suhajira ==
Line 55: Line 56:


[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 353.139{{c}}
* [[WE]]: ~2 = 1196.3496{{c}}, ~11/9 = 352.8809{{c}}
* [[POTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 353.958{{c}}
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 353.7832{{c}}
<!-- * [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 353.139{{c}}
* [[POTE]]: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 353.958{{c}} -->
 
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 10, 17, 44e, 61de, 78ddee, 139bdddeeee }}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 10, 17, 44e, 61de }}
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 0.602


Scales: [[suhajira7]], [[suhajira10]], [[suhajira17]]
Scales: [[suhajira7]], [[suhajira10]], [[suhajira17]]
Line 72: Line 77:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 353.219{{c}}
* WE: ~2 = 1196.8114{{c}}, ~11/9 = 352.8351{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 353.775{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 353.6791{{c}}
<!-- * CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 352.219{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 353.775{{c}} -->


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 10, 17, 44e, 61de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 10, 17, 44e, 61de, 78ddee }}
 
Badness (Sintel): 0.425


Scales: [[suhajira7]], [[suhajira10]], [[suhajira17]]
Scales: [[suhajira7]], [[suhajira10]], [[suhajira17]]


== Mohaha ==
== Mohaha ==
Mohaha can be thought of, intuitively, as "meantone with quartertones"; as is the 3/2 generator subdivided in half, so is the [[~]][[25/24]] chromatic semitone divided into two equal ~[[33/32]] quarter tones (in the 2.3.5.11 subgroup). Within this paradigm, mohaha is the temperament that splits the 3/2 into two equal 11/9's, that splits the 6/5 into two equal 11/10~12/11's, and that maps four 3/2's to 5/1. It has a heptatonic mos with three larger steps and four smaller ones, going [[3L 4s|sLsLsLs]]. Taking septimal meantone mapping of 7 leads to [[#Migration]], flattone mapping of 7 leads to [[#Ptolemy]], and dominant mapping of 7 leads to [[#Neutrominant]], while tempering out [[176/175]] gives [[mohajira]] (shown at [[Meantone family#Mohajira|Meantone family]]).
Mohaha can be thought of, intuitively, as meantone with quartertones; as is the 3/2 generator subdivided in half, so is the [[~]][[25/24]] chromatic semitone divided into two equal ~[[33/32]] quartertones (in the 2.3.5.11 subgroup). Within this paradigm, mohaha is the temperament that splits the 3/2 into two equal 11/9's, that splits the 6/5 into two equal 11/10~12/11's, and that maps four 3/2's to 5/1. It has a heptatonic mos with three larger steps and four smaller ones, going [[3L 4s|sLsLsLs]]. Taking septimal meantone mapping of 7 leads to [[#Migration]], flattone mapping of 7 leads to [[#Ptolemy]], and dominant mapping of 7 leads to [[#Neutrominant]], while tempering out [[176/175]] gives [[mohajira]] (shown at [[Meantone family #Mohajira|Meantone family]]).


=== 2.3.5.11 subgroup ===
=== 2.3.5.11 subgroup ===
Line 94: Line 103:


[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
* [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.8296{{c}}
* [[WE]]: ~2 = 1201.8548{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.6318{{c}}
* [[POTE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.0938{{c}}
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.3793{{c}}
<!-- * [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.8296{{c}}
* [[POTE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.0938{{c}} -->


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 17c, 24, 31, 69e, 100e, 131bee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 17c, 24, 31, 69e, 100e, 131bee }}
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 0.401


Scales: [[mohaha7]], [[mohaha10]]
Scales: [[mohaha7]], [[mohaha10]]
Line 111: Line 124:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.8794{{c}}
* [[WE]]: ~2 = 1199.8846{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.8820{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.9155{{c}}
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.9040{{c}}
<!-- * CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.8794{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.9155{{c}} -->


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 17c, 24, 31, 55 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 17c, 24, 31, 55 }}
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 0.401


Scales: [[mohaha7]], [[mohaha10]]
Scales: [[mohaha7]], [[mohaha10]]
Line 124: Line 141:


Mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 0 -3 2 | 0 2 8 20 5 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 0 -3 2 | 0 2 8 20 5 }}
: mapping generators: ~2, ~11/9


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.5324{{c}}
* WE: ~2 = 1201.7423{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.6879{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.182{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.2867{{c}}
<!-- * CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.5324{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.182{{c}} -->


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 24d, 31, 100de, 131bdee, 162bdee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 24d, 31, 100de, 131bdee, 162bdee }}


Badness: 0.025516
Badness (Sintel): 0.844


==== 13-limit ====
==== 13-limit ====
Line 143: Line 160:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.5444{{c}}
* WE: ~2 = 1200.2590{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.5648{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.490{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.5009{{c}}
<!-- * CTE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.5444{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.490{{c}} -->


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 24d, 31 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7d, 24d, 31 }}


Badness: 0.028071
Badness (Sintel): 1.16


=== Ptolemy ===
=== Ptolemy ===
Line 158: Line 177:


Mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 0 8 2 | 0 2 8 -18 5 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 0 8 2 | 0 2 8 -18 5 }}
: mapping generators: ~2, ~11/9


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 346.905{{c}}
* WE: ~2 = 1203.8812{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.0444{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 346.922{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 346.9194{{c}}
<!-- * CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 346.905{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 346.922{{c}} -->


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 31dd, 38d, 45e, 83bcddee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 31dd, 38d, 45e, 83bcddee }}
Badness (Sintel): 1.94


==== 13-limit ====
==== 13-limit ====
Line 175: Line 196:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 346.754{{c}}
* WE: ~2 = 1203.9456{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.0510{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 346.910{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 346.8878{{c}}
<!-- * CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 346.754{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 346.910{{c}} -->


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 31ddf, 38df, 45ef, 83bcddeeff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 31ddf, 38df, 45ef, 83bcddeeff, 128bccddeeefff }}


Badness: 0.034316
Badness (Sintel): 1.42


=== Neutrominant ===
=== Neutrominant ===
<span style="display: block; text-align: right;">[[:de:maqamisch|Deutsch]]</span>
{{Main| Neutrominant }}
{{Main| Neutrominant }}


Line 193: Line 215:


Mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 0 4 2 | 0 2 8 -4 5 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 0 4 2 | 0 2 8 -4 5 }}
: mapping generators: ~2, ~11/9


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 349.865{{c}}
* WE: ~2 = 1195.9529{{c}}, ~11/9 = 349.7505{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 350.934{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 350.7031{{c}}
<!-- * CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 349.865{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 350.934{{c}} -->


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 17c, 24d, 41cd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 17c, 24d, 41cd }}


Badness: 0.040240
Badness (Sintel): 1.33


==== 13-limit ====
==== 13-limit ====
Line 212: Line 234:


Optimal tunings:  
Optimal tunings:  
* CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 349.904{{c}}
* WE: ~2 = 1196.3143{{c}}, ~11/9 = 349.7387{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 350.816{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 350.6573{{c}}
<!-- * CTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 349.904{{c}}
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 350.816{{c}} -->


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 17c, 24d, 41cd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 7, 17c, 24d, 41cd }}


Badness: 0.027214
Badness (Sintel): 1.12


== Semisema ==
== Semisema ==
In addition to dividing the perfect fifth into two equal parts of 11/9~27/22, semisema, being an extension of [[semaphore]], also divides the perfect fourth into two equal parts of {{nowrap|7/6 ~ 8/7}}.
In addition to dividing the perfect fifth into two equal parts of 11/9~27/22, semisema, being an extension of [[semaphore]], also divides the perfect fourth into two equal parts of 7/6~8/7.
 
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.7.11


Subgroup: 2.3.7.11
[[Comma list]]: 49/48, 243/242


Comma list: 49/48, 243/242
{{Mapping|legend=2| 2 0 4 -1 | 0 2 1 5 }}


{{Mapping|legend=2| 2 2 5 4 | 0 2 1 5 }}
{{Mapping|legend=3| 2 0 0 4 -1 | 0 2 0 1 5 }}


{{Mapping|legend=3| 2 2 0 5 4 | 0 2 0 1 5 }}
: mapping generators: ~77/54, ~7/4


: mapping generators: ~77/54, ~11/9
[[Optimal tuning]]s:
* [[WE]]: ~2 = 601.5167{{c}}, ~7/4 = 951.1267{{c}}
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 600.0000{{c}}, ~7/4 = 949.6883{{c}}
<!-- * CTE: ~77/54 = 600.000{{c}}, ~7/4 = 951.181{{c}}
* POTE: ~77/54 = 600.000{{c}}, ~7/4 = 948.728{{c}} -->


Optimal tunings:
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 10, 14, 24, 62dd }}
* CTE: ~77/54 = 600.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 351.181{{c}}
* POTE: ~77/54 = 600.000{{c}}, ~11/9 = 348.728{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10, 14, 24, 62dd }}
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 0.776


[[Category:Temperament clans]]
[[Category:Temperament clans]]

Revision as of 14:22, 24 August 2025

This is a list showing technical temperament data. For an explanation of what information is shown here, you may look at the technical data guide for regular temperaments.

The rastmic clan of temperaments tempers out the rastma, 243/242 ([-1 5 0 0 -2⟩).

Neutral

Neutral is the 2.3.11-subgroup temperament with a generator of a neutral third which can be taken to represent 11/9~27/22, two of which make up a perfect fifth of 3/2. It can be thought of as the 2.3.11 version of either mohajira or neutrominant, as well as suhajira and ringo. Among other things, it is the temperament optimizing the neutral tetrad.

Subgroup: 2.3.11

Comma list: 243/242

Subgroup-val mapping: [⟨1 1 2], ⟨0 2 5]]

Gencom mapping: [⟨1 1 0 0 2], ⟨0 2 0 0 5]]

mapping generators: ~2, ~11/9

Optimal tunings:

  • CTE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~11/9 = 350.572 ¢
  • POTE: ~2 = 1200.000 ¢, ~11/9 = 350.525 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 17, 24, 65, 89, 202, 291, 380

Badness (Sintel): 0.0700

Scales: neutral7, neutral10, neutral17

Namo

Namo adds 144/143 to the comma list and finds ~16/13 at the same neutral third. With 11/9~16/13, it requires a slightly flat ~27/22 as the tuning of the neutral third. 58edo is the largest patent val tuning for it in the optimal ET sequence, with a tuning between that of 17edo and 41edo, so that ~11 and ~13 are practically equally sharp, given that 29edo forms a consistent circle of 13/11's with a closing error of 31.2%. It might be recommended as a tuning for this reason, as having the neutral third much sharper to optimize plausibility of ~16/13 implies that the 11 is extremely sharp because 11/9 must be tuned sharp so that 11 must be sharper than 9, which is thus four times as sharp as however sharp of the (3/2)1/2 neutral third is, while tuning it much flatter means that you increase the error of 16/13, which in 58edo is already as almost 8 ¢ off and in 99ef it is only slightly worse. For these reasons, Godtone is not fond of the recommendations by the various optimal tunings to tune flat of 58edo, although it is clear that in an optimal tuning nothing much sharper than 58edo should be used, as making 11 more off than 13 would imply damaging 3 and 11/9 more than necessary. Curiously, POTE (351.488 ¢) recommends a sharper tuning than CWE here, but still flat of 58edo.

Subgroup: 2.3.11.13

Comma list: 144/143, 243/242

Subgroup-val mapping: [⟨1 1 2 4], ⟨0 2 5 -1]]

Gencom mapping: [⟨1 1 0 0 2 4], ⟨0 2 0 0 5 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1198.8553 ¢, ~11/9 = 351.1523 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/9 = 351.2700 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 10, 17, 41, 58, 99ef, 239eefff, 338eeeffff

Badness (Sintel): 0.133

Suhajira

Subgroup: 2.3.7.11

Comma list: 64/63, 243/242

Subgroup-val mapping: [⟨1 1 4 2], ⟨0 2 -4 5]]

Gencom mapping: [⟨1 1 0 4 2], ⟨0 2 0 -4 5]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1196.3496 ¢, ~11/9 = 352.8809 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/9 = 353.7832 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 10, 17, 44e, 61de, 78ddee, 139bdddeeee

Badness (Sintel): 0.602

Scales: suhajira7, suhajira10, suhajira17

2.3.7.11.13 subgroup

Subgroup: 2.3.7.11.13

Comma list: 64/63, 78/77, 144/143

Subgroup-val mapping: [⟨1 1 4 2 4], ⟨0 2 -4 5 -1]]

Gencom mapping: [⟨1 1 0 4 2 4], ⟨0 2 0 -4 5 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1196.8114 ¢, ~11/9 = 352.8351 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/9 = 353.6791 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 10, 17, 44e, 61de, 78ddee

Badness (Sintel): 0.425

Scales: suhajira7, suhajira10, suhajira17

Mohaha

Mohaha can be thought of, intuitively, as meantone with quartertones; as is the 3/2 generator subdivided in half, so is the ~25/24 chromatic semitone divided into two equal ~33/32 quartertones (in the 2.3.5.11 subgroup). Within this paradigm, mohaha is the temperament that splits the 3/2 into two equal 11/9's, that splits the 6/5 into two equal 11/10~12/11's, and that maps four 3/2's to 5/1. It has a heptatonic mos with three larger steps and four smaller ones, going sLsLsLs. Taking septimal meantone mapping of 7 leads to #Migration, flattone mapping of 7 leads to #Ptolemy, and dominant mapping of 7 leads to #Neutrominant, while tempering out 176/175 gives mohajira (shown at Meantone family).

2.3.5.11 subgroup

The S-expression-based comma list of this temperament is {S6/S8 = S9, S11}.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.11

Comma list: 81/80, 121/120

Subgroup-val mapping: [⟨1 1 0 2], ⟨0 2 8 5]]

Gencom mapping: [⟨1 1 0 0 2], ⟨0 2 8 0 5]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1201.8548 ¢, ~11/9 = 348.6318 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/9 = 348.3793 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 17c, 24, 31, 69e, 100e, 131bee

Badness (Sintel): 0.401

Scales: mohaha7, mohaha10

Mohoho

Subgroup: 2.3.5.11.13

Comma list: 66/65, 81/80, 121/120

Subgroup-val mapping: [⟨1 1 0 2 4], ⟨0 2 8 5 -1]]

Gencom mapping: [⟨1 1 0 0 2 4], ⟨0 2 8 0 5 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1199.8846 ¢, ~11/9 = 348.8820 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/9 = 348.9040 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 17c, 24, 31, 55

Badness (Sintel): 0.401

Scales: mohaha7, mohaha10

Migration

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 81/80, 121/120, 126/125

Mapping: [⟨1 1 0 -3 2], ⟨0 2 8 20 5]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1201.7423 ¢, ~11/9 = 348.6879 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/9 = 348.2867 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7d, 24d, 31, 100de, 131bdee, 162bdee

Badness (Sintel): 0.844

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 66/65, 81/80, 121/120, 126/125

Mapping: [⟨1 1 0 -3 2 4], ⟨0 2 8 20 5 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.2590 ¢, ~11/9 = 348.5648 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/9 = 348.5009 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7d, 24d, 31

Badness (Sintel): 1.16

Ptolemy

"Ptolemy" redirects here. For the Ancient Greek polymath, see Wikipedia: Ptolemy.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 81/80, 121/120, 525/512

Mapping: [⟨1 1 0 8 2], ⟨0 2 8 -18 5]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1203.8812 ¢, ~11/9 = 348.0444 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/9 = 346.9194 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 31dd, 38d, 45e, 83bcddee

Badness (Sintel): 1.94

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 65/64, 81/80, 105/104, 121/120

Mapping: [⟨1 1 0 8 2 6], ⟨0 2 8 -18 5 -8]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1203.9456 ¢, ~11/9 = 348.0510 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/9 = 346.8878 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 31ddf, 38df, 45ef, 83bcddeeff, 128bccddeeefff

Badness (Sintel): 1.42

Neutrominant

Main article: Neutrominant

The neutrominant temperament (formerly maqamic temperament) has a hemififth generator (~11/9) and tempers out 36/35 and 121/120. It makes the most sense if viewed as an adaptive temperament, whereby 7/4 and 9/5 simply share an equivalence class in the resulting scales, but don't need to share a particular tempered "middle-of-the-road" intonation.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 36/35, 64/63, 121/120

Mapping: [⟨1 1 0 4 2], ⟨0 2 8 -4 5]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1195.9529 ¢, ~11/9 = 349.7505 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/9 = 350.7031 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 17c, 24d, 41cd

Badness (Sintel): 1.33

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 36/35, 64/63, 66/65, 121/120

Mapping: [⟨1 1 0 4 2 4], ⟨0 2 8 -4 5 -1]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1196.3143 ¢, ~11/9 = 349.7387 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~11/9 = 350.6573 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 7, 17c, 24d, 41cd

Badness (Sintel): 1.12

Semisema

In addition to dividing the perfect fifth into two equal parts of 11/9~27/22, semisema, being an extension of semaphore, also divides the perfect fourth into two equal parts of 7/6~8/7.

Subgroup: 2.3.7.11

Comma list: 49/48, 243/242

Subgroup-val mapping: [⟨2 0 4 -1], ⟨0 2 1 5]]

Gencom mapping: [⟨2 0 0 4 -1], ⟨0 2 0 1 5]]

mapping generators: ~77/54, ~7/4

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 601.5167 ¢, ~7/4 = 951.1267 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 600.0000 ¢, ~7/4 = 949.6883 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 10, 14, 24, 62dd

Badness (Sintel): 0.776

Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Rastmic_clan&oldid=208182"