Septiennealimmal clan: Difference between revisions
m →Septiennealic: clarify |
Re-wording to avoid suggesting causality. +badness. Misc. cleanup |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]]s: | [[Optimal tuning]]s: | ||
* [[CTE]]: ~2592/2401 = 133. | * [[CTE]]: ~2592/2401 = 133.3333, ~3/2 = 702.0044 | ||
: [[error map]]: {{val| 0.0000 +0.0494 -0.1549 }} | : [[error map]]: {{val| 0.0000 +0.0494 -0.1549 }} | ||
* [[POTE]]: ~2592/2401 = 133. | * [[POTE]]: ~2592/2401 = 133.3333, ~3/2 = 701.9649 | ||
: error map: {{val| 0.0000 +0.0099 -0.1944 }} | : error map: {{val| 0.0000 +0.0099 -0.1944 }} | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
=== Septiennealic === | === Septiennealic === | ||
Septiennealic finds a somewhat high-damage but very simple | Septiennealic finds a somewhat high-damage but very simple and intuitive mapping of prime 13 by fixing 13/12~14/13 at 1\9. | ||
A notable tuning of septiennealic not appearing in the optimal ET sequence is [[63edo]] | A notable tuning of septiennealic not appearing in the optimal ET sequence is [[63edo]]. If we include a somewhat more complex mapping for 11 via {{nowrap| 36e & 63 }}, it will become the optimal patent val and largest in the sequence. | ||
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.7.13 | [[Subgroup]]: 2.3.7.13 | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
{{Mapping|legend=2| 9 0 11 19 | 0 1 1 1 }} | {{Mapping|legend=2| 9 0 11 19 | 0 1 1 1 }} | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~13/12 = 133. | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~13/12 = 133.333, ~3/2 = 702.638 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27, 36, 99, 135f, 171f }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27, 36, 99, 135f, 171f }} | ||
[[Badness]] | [[Badness]]: | ||
* Smith: 0.0134 | |||
* Dirichlet: 0.540 | |||
=== Ennea === | === Ennea === | ||
| Line 55: | Line 57: | ||
Optimal tunings: | Optimal tunings: | ||
* CTE: ~121/112 = 133. | * CTE: ~121/112 = 133.3333, 343/198 = 951.0143 (~99/98 = 17.6810) | ||
* POTE: ~121/112 = 133. | * POTE: ~121/112 = 133.3333, 343/198 = 950.9591 (~99/98 = 17.6258) | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 54, 63, 72, 135, 342, 477, 1089, 1566 }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 54, 63, 72, 135, 342, 477, 1089, 1566 }} | ||