Tetracot family: Difference between revisions

Xenllium (talk | contribs)
m Subgroup temperament updated (POTE -> CTE)
Review
Line 49: Line 49:
Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 1 2 | 0 4 9 10 }}
Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 1 2 | 0 4 9 10 }}


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.874
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.7765


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 20ce, 27e, 34, 41, 75e, 116e }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 20ce, 27e, 34, 41, 75e }}


Badness: 0.014706
Badness: 0.014706
Line 62: Line 62:
Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 1 2 4 | 0 4 9 10 -2 }}
Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 1 2 4 | 0 4 9 10 -2 }}


Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 176.007
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.8150


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 27e, 34, 41, 75e }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 20ce, 27e, 34, 41, 75e, 109ef }}


Badness: 0.012311
Badness: 0.012311
Line 81: Line 81:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.676
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.676


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 27d, 34, 41, 239cd, 280ccdd, 321ccdd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 34, 41 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.073437
[[Badness]]: 0.073437
Line 94: Line 94:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.598
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.598


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 27de, 34, 41 }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 34, 41 }}


Badness: 0.038836
Badness: 0.038836
Line 107: Line 107:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.618
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.618


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 27de, 34, 41 }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 34, 41 }}


Badness: 0.028410
Badness: 0.028410
Line 120: Line 120:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.754
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.754


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, …, 27de, 34, 41, 116defg, 157cdeffgg }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 34, 41 }}


Badness: 0.025936
Badness: 0.025936
Line 133: Line 133:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.697
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.697


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 27deh, 34, 41 }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 34, 41 }}


Badness: 0.022158
Badness: 0.022158
Line 150: Line 150:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.785
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.785


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 34d, 41, 116, 157c, 355cc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7d, …, 34d, 41, 116, 157c, 198c }}


[[Badness]]: 0.062897
[[Badness]]: 0.062897
Line 163: Line 163:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.738
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.738


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34d, 41, 116e, 157ce, 198cee, 239cee }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, …, 34d, 41, 116e }}


Badness: 0.031332
Badness: 0.031332
Line 176: Line 176:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.748
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.748


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34d, 41, 116ef, 157ceff, 198ceeff }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 34d, 41, 116ef }}


Badness: 0.024886
Badness: 0.024886
Line 189: Line 189:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.811
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.811


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34d, 41, 75e, 116efg, 157ceffgg }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34d, 41, 75e }}


Badness: 0.023404
Badness: 0.023404
Line 202: Line 202:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.802
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.802


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34dh, 41, 116efg, 157ceffgg }}
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34dh, 41, 75e }}


Badness: 0.019460
Badness: 0.019460