Tetracot family: Difference between revisions
m Subgroup temperament updated (POTE -> CTE) |
Review |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 1 2 | 0 4 9 10 }} | Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 1 2 | 0 4 9 10 }} | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175. | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.7765 | ||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 20ce, 27e, 34, 41, 75e | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 20ce, 27e, 34, 41, 75e }} | ||
Badness: 0.014706 | Badness: 0.014706 | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 1 2 4 | 0 4 9 10 -2 }} | Sval mapping: {{mapping| 1 1 1 2 4 | 0 4 9 10 -2 }} | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.8150 | ||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 27e, 34, 41, 75e }} | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 20ce, 27e, 34, 41, 75e, 109ef }} | ||
Badness: 0.012311 | Badness: 0.012311 | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.676 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.676 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7 | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 34, 41 }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.073437 | [[Badness]]: 0.073437 | ||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.598 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.598 | ||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7 | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 34, 41 }} | ||
Badness: 0.038836 | Badness: 0.038836 | ||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.618 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.618 | ||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7 | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 34, 41 }} | ||
Badness: 0.028410 | Badness: 0.028410 | ||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.754 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.754 | ||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7 | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 34, 41 }} | ||
Badness: 0.025936 | Badness: 0.025936 | ||
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.697 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.697 | ||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7 | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7, 34, 41 }} | ||
Badness: 0.022158 | Badness: 0.022158 | ||
| Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.785 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.785 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 34d, 41, 116, 157c, | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7d, …, 34d, 41, 116, 157c, 198c }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.062897 | [[Badness]]: 0.062897 | ||
| Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.738 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.738 | ||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34d, 41, 116e | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, …, 34d, 41, 116e }} | ||
Badness: 0.031332 | Badness: 0.031332 | ||
| Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.748 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.748 | ||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34d, 41, 116ef | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 7d, 34d, 41, 116ef }} | ||
Badness: 0.024886 | Badness: 0.024886 | ||
| Line 189: | Line 189: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.811 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.811 | ||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34d, 41, 75e | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34d, 41, 75e }} | ||
Badness: 0.023404 | Badness: 0.023404 | ||
| Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.802 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.802 | ||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34dh, 41, | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 34dh, 41, 75e }} | ||
Badness: 0.019460 | Badness: 0.019460 | ||