User:BudjarnLambeth: Difference between revisions

Line 199:

===Hot takes===

* We ~~all~~ take ourselves ~~too~~ seriously ~~and~~ should have ~~a little~~ more fun 🎉

* We should take ourselves less seriously: we should have more fun, we should be more silly 🎉

* It’s fine to explore the 2.3.5.101 [[subgroup]] if you want to. It doesn’t matter that it’s less [[concordant]] than 2.3.5.7. Explore it anyway and see what happens. Do some stuff with [[:Category:Novelties|arbitrary numbers]] that don’t make logical sense and just see what comes of it. That’s where the fun is! (Though ~~maybe~~ keep a “2.3” or “3.5” in there just to smooth over the gnarliest edges, heehee.)

* It’s fine to explore the 2.3.5.101 [[subgroup]] if you want to. It doesn’t matter that it’s less [[concordant]] than 2.3.5.7. Explore it anyway and see what happens. Do some stuff with [[:Category:Novelties|arbitrary numbers]] that don’t make logical sense and just see what comes of it. That’s where the fun is! (Though do keep a “2.3” or “3.5” in there just to smooth over the gnarliest edges, heehee.)

* I would prefer to use a temperament [[Temperament naming|named]] something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “countertrihexakleismatic” even if it’s super [[damage|accurate]] and technically [[badness|better]] - a bland name can kill a temperament’s appeal, a fun name can create appeal out of nothing.

* ~~An bit of a rant~~ I wrote criticising the negative and praising the positive ways Western tuning theory has borrowed from the world’s traditions: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]]

* A little opinion piece I wrote criticising the negative and praising the positive ways Western tuning theory has borrowed from the world’s traditions: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]]

@@ Line 199: / Line 199: @@
 ===Hot takes===
-* We all take ourselves too seriously and should have a little more fun 🎉
+* We should take ourselves less seriously: we should have more fun, we should be more silly 🎉
-* It’s fine to explore the 2.3.5.101 [[subgroup]] if you want to. It doesn’t matter that it’s less [[concordant]] than 2.3.5.7. Explore it anyway and see what happens. Do some stuff with [[:Category:Novelties|arbitrary numbers]] that don’t make logical sense and just see what comes of it. That’s where the fun is! (Though maybe keep a “2.3” or “3.5” in there just to smooth over the gnarliest edges, heehee.)
+* It’s fine to explore the 2.3.5.101 [[subgroup]] if you want to. It doesn’t matter that it’s less [[concordant]] than 2.3.5.7. Explore it anyway and see what happens. Do some stuff with [[:Category:Novelties|arbitrary numbers]] that don’t make logical sense and just see what comes of it. That’s where the fun is! (Though do keep a “2.3” or “3.5” in there just to smooth over the gnarliest edges, heehee.)
 * I would prefer to use a temperament [[Temperament naming|named]] something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “countertrihexakleismatic” even if it’s super [[damage|accurate]] and technically [[badness|better]] - a bland name can kill a temperament’s appeal, a fun name can create appeal out of nothing.
-* An bit of a rant I wrote criticising the negative and praising the positive ways Western tuning theory has borrowed from the world’s traditions: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]]
+* A little opinion piece I wrote criticising the negative and praising the positive ways Western tuning theory has borrowed from the world’s traditions: [[User:BudjarnLambeth/Cultural appropriation-o-meter]]
 <br><br>