BudjarnLambeth
Joined 22 July 2022
| Line 192: | Line 192: | ||
* Most of the ‘mathematically optimal’ things in music tuning have already been found, so when making new discoveries now, it’s more important to find something that sounds new or interesting or has some quirky story behind it, than it is to find the most mathematically optimal thing | * Most of the ‘mathematically optimal’ things in music tuning have already been found, so when making new discoveries now, it’s more important to find something that sounds new or interesting or has some quirky story behind it, than it is to find the most mathematically optimal thing | ||
* I would prefer to use a temperament named something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “triglycerohexakleismatic” even if it’s super accurate and technically better; names matter a lot to me | * I would prefer to use a temperament named something fun like “waterslide” or “jinglebells” even if it has lots of error, over one named something dry and bland like “triglycerohexakleismatic” even if it’s super accurate and technically better; names matter a lot to me | ||
<br><br> | |||
===Ratios as planets=== | ===Ratios as planets=== | ||