Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do: Difference between revisions
re: tables of commas |
|||
Line 208: | Line 208: | ||
:: Uh, it was you who suggested adding "comments". [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC) | :: Uh, it was you who suggested adding "comments". [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: Is the discussion about whether to remove these tables of commas? I don't think they should be removed because they often list lots of commas that ''aren't'' given under the "Theory" section of a rank one temperament; in other words they're usually a lot more complete. I find them interesting to look at and I don't think they're entirely useless. If anything I'd argue that we should remove the list of commas under "Theory" and just talk about what temperaments (ones which temper more than one comma) a rank one temperament is good for. Then have a comprehensive list of commas sorted by prime limit as a table, kind of like how we have tables of intervals for some large EDOs. Also, IMO, comments on the commas shouldn't be included, instead, there should be many more comma-specific pages explaining both what exactly a comma allows you to do and listing various temperaments that support tempering it. [[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 19:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
::: Sorry for the confusion. I meant that this column should be only there if there actually are (useful) comments. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 14:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC) | ::: Sorry for the confusion. I meant that this column should be only there if there actually are (useful) comments. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 14:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC) |