Semaphoresmic clan: Difference between revisions

Semaphore: +links
m Re-adopt template: Optimal ET sequence
Line 96: Line 96:
* 11-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~7/4 = [933.129, 968.826]
* 11-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~7/4 = [933.129, 968.826]


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 14c, 19, 33cd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14c, 19, 33cd }}


Badness (Smith): 0.028947
Badness (Smith): 0.028947
Line 115: Line 115:
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~7/4 = [910.890, 968.826]
* 13- and 15-odd-limit diamond tradeoff: ~7/4 = [910.890, 968.826]


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 14cf, 19, 33cdff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14cf, 19, 33cdff }}


Badness (Smith): 0.022503
Badness (Smith): 0.022503
Line 130: Line 130:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 945.958
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 945.958


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 14c, 19e, 33cdee, 52cdeee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14c, 19e, 33cdee, 52cdeee }}


Badness (Smith): 0.028510
Badness (Smith): 0.028510
Line 145: Line 145:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 948.921
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 948.921


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 19e, 24, 43de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19e, 24, 43de }}


Badness (Smith): 0.039647
Badness (Smith): 0.039647
Line 160: Line 160:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 948.835
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 948.835


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 19e, 24, 43de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19e, 24, 43de }}


Badness (Smith): 0.025676
Badness (Smith): 0.025676
Line 175: Line 175:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 948.827
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 948.827


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 19, 24 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 19, 24 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.035673
Badness (Smith): 0.035673
Line 190: Line 190:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 948.802
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 948.802


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 19, 24 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 19, 24 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.026703
Badness (Smith): 0.026703
Line 248: Line 248:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 940.041
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 940.041


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 14c, 23de, 37bcde }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 14c, 23de, 37bcde }}


Badness (Smith): 0.028535
Badness (Smith): 0.028535
Line 285: Line 285:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 978.164
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~7/4 = 978.164


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 5, 11b }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 5, 11b }}


Badness (Smith): 0.036538
Badness (Smith): 0.036538
Line 348: Line 348:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~14/13 = 125.567
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~14/13 = 125.567


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 10, 19, 48df, 67cddf, 86cddff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 10, 19, 48df, 67cddf, 86cddff }}


=== 11-limit ===
=== 11-limit ===
Line 363: Line 363:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~15/14 = 126.474
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~15/14 = 126.474


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 10, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 10, 19 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.026190
Badness (Smith): 0.026190
Line 378: Line 378:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~14/13 = 126.431
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~14/13 = 126.431


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 10, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 10, 19 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.017833
Badness (Smith): 0.017833
Line 395: Line 395:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~15/14 = 124.767
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~15/14 = 124.767


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 10e, 19, 29, 48d, 77cdd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10e, 19, 29, 48d, 77cdd }}


Badness (Smith): 0.038679
Badness (Smith): 0.038679
Line 410: Line 410:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~14/13 = 124.716
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~14/13 = 124.716


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 10e, 19, 29, 48df, 77cddf }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10e, 19, 29, 48df, 77cddf }}


Badness (Smith): 0.024383
Badness (Smith): 0.024383
Line 427: Line 427:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~15/14 = 127.039
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~15/14 = 127.039


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 19e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 19e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.030617
Badness (Smith): 0.030617
Line 442: Line 442:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~14/13 = 127.039
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~14/13 = 127.039


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 19e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 19e }}


Badness (Smith): 0.020205
Badness (Smith): 0.020205
Line 457: Line 457:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~15/14 = 124.539
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~15/14 = 124.539


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 10, 19e, 29, 77cddee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10, 19e, 29, 77cddee }}


Badness (Smith): 0.035296
Badness (Smith): 0.035296
Line 472: Line 472:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~14/13 = 124.545
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~14/13 = 124.545


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 10, 19e, 29, 77cddeef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 10, 19e, 29, 77cddeef }}


Badness (Smith): 0.021559
Badness (Smith): 0.021559
Line 489: Line 489:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/8 = 537.186
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/8 = 537.186


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 20, 29, 38d, 67cdde, 105cdddee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 20, 29, 38d, 67cdde, 105cdddee }}


Badness (Smith): 0.041886
Badness (Smith): 0.041886
Line 504: Line 504:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/8 = 537.208
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/8 = 537.208


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 20, 29, 38df, 67cddef, 105cdddeefff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 20, 29, 38df, 67cddef, 105cdddeefff }}


Badness (Smith): 0.025192
Badness (Smith): 0.025192
Line 519: Line 519:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/8 = 537.230
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/8 = 537.230


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 20g, 29g, 38df, 67cddefg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 20g, 29g, 38df, 67cddefg }}


Badness (Smith): 0.021778
Badness (Smith): 0.021778
Line 534: Line 534:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/8 = 537.214
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~11/8 = 537.214


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 9, 20g, 29g, 38df, 67cddefgh }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 9, 20g, 29g, 38df, 67cddefgh }}


Badness (Smith): 0.016828
Badness (Smith): 0.016828
Line 566: Line 566:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~16/15 = 80.817
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~16/15 = 80.817


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 14e, 15 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14e, 15 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.069398
Badness (Smith): 0.069398
Line 581: Line 581:
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~16/15 = 81.024
* POTE: ~2 = 1200.000, ~16/15 = 81.024


Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 14e, 15 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 14e, 15 }}


Badness (Smith): 0.048553
Badness (Smith): 0.048553