User talk:Aura: Difference between revisions

(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 425:

:::::::::: Sorry about not responding for a while, I had stuff to do, but I was reading what you were saying, and I've been checking in on harmonies that you can get from instances of ~85/64 and ~128/85. It seems that in 159edo, starting on your ~17/16, you can build an approximation of a 1/1-25/22-128/85-320/187 suspension easily, and you can use this as an unexpected option for something resembling a Neapolitan chord. Not sure how this chord fits with 11L 2s however- it probably doesn't. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::: 11L 2s won't include 25/22 (29\159, which is 3\159 too high) or 320/187 (123\159, which is also 3\159 too high — I just checked to make sure it maps correctly, although 200/117 is a lot more accurate). I was thinking maybe a MODMOS derived from 11L 2s would do it, but for that to work, one would have to be too high and the other too low. So it would have to be made with accidentals. Of course, 159edo has a load of other scales, so maybe one of these might do the job without accidentals. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 18:10, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::: I don't know if this is a good temperament for 11L 2s, but I stumbled upon [[Alphatricot_family#Tritricot|Tritricot]] while looking up stuff for temperamental generator of temperaments supporting 17L 2s: All listed *-limits of Tritricot list 159edo as their first optimal tuning. (And even if Tritricot isn't optimal for 11L 2s, it WILL work by hook or by crook, since all EDOs listed in the optimal tuning sequence are ≥159edo, and 159edo is already >143edo, which is the largest EDO that DOESN'T support 11L&nbsp2s, being to 11L 2s what 35edo is to 5L 2s. But I have yet to check whether you have to use some awful number of generators to get 11/8 or 16/11. Although at that high an EDO size, a MODmos based upon 11L 2s is likely to be better anyway, and for that you're going to want at least a secondary generator.) [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 05:05, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

== Notability guidelines review ==

I drafted up a new proposal for the notability guidelines over at [[User:Sintel/Notability guidelines]].

You can use the talk page there to let us know what you think about them, especially in context of the discussion on the previous proposal wrt some of the pages you created.

Thank you! – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 23:46, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

: Note for future readers: this conversation moved to [[User talk:Sintel/Notability guidelines]] from this point. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 02:41, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 425: / Line 425: @@
 :::::::::: Sorry about not responding for a while, I had stuff to do, but I was reading what you were saying, and I've been checking in on harmonies that you can get from instances of ~85/64 and ~128/85.  It seems that in 159edo, starting on your ~17/16, you can build an approximation of a 1/1-25/22-128/85-320/187 suspension easily, and you can use this as an unexpected option for something resembling a Neapolitan chord.  Not sure how this chord fits with 11L 2s however- it probably doesn't. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:24, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
+::::::::::: 11L&nbsp;2s won't include 25/22 (29\159, which is 3\159 too high) or 320/187 (123\159, which is also 3\159 too high &mdash; I just checked to make sure it maps correctly, although 200/117 is a lot more accurate).  I was thinking maybe a MODMOS derived from 11L&nbsp;2s would do it, but for that to work, one would have to be too high and the other too low.  So it would have to be made with accidentals.  Of course, 159edo has a load of other scales, so maybe one of these might do the job without accidentals.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 18:10, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
+:::::::::::: I don't know if this is a good temperament for 11L&nbsp;2s, but I stumbled upon [[Alphatricot_family#Tritricot|Tritricot]] while looking up stuff for temperamental generator of temperaments supporting 17L&nbsp;2s:  All listed *-limits of Tritricot list 159edo as their first optimal tuning.  (And even if Tritricot isn't optimal for 11L&nbsp;2s, it WILL work by hook or by crook, since all EDOs listed in the optimal tuning sequence are ≥159edo, and 159edo is already >143edo, which is the largest EDO that DOESN'T support 11L&nbsp2s, being to 11L&nbsp;2s what 35edo is to 5L&nbsp;2s.  But I have yet to check whether you have to use some awful number of generators to get 11/8 or 16/11.  Although at that high an EDO size, a MODmos based upon 11L&nbsp;2s is likely to be better anyway, and for that you're going to want at least a secondary generator.)  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 05:05, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
+== Notability guidelines review ==
+I drafted up a new proposal for the notability guidelines over at [[User:Sintel/Notability guidelines]].
+You can use the talk page there to let us know what you think about them, especially in context of the discussion on the previous proposal wrt some of the pages you created.
+Thank you! – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 23:46, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
+: Note for future readers: this conversation moved to [[User talk:Sintel/Notability guidelines]] from this point. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 02:41, 8 May 2025 (UTC)