User talk:Lériendil

From Godtone

TY sincerely for helping with the diaschismic-kleismic equivalence continuum, I couldn't have done it without you. I hope you like the final form of the page; I've tried to make it absolutely as simultaneously elegant, detailed and comprehensive as I know how to. It's nice that basically every temperament lies somewhere at a simple (half-integer) place on one of the two main continuums; the main exception is the 34 & 142 temperament, which is truly fractional. What do you think about adding half-integer points to the main table too? Almost everything corresponds to a notable temperament, but maybe it makes the main table too long? --Godtone (talk) 01:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Hmm... actually, every temperament lies at a half-integer point! 34 & 142 is at 4.5 on the first continuum. That means we have the option of getting rid of the fractional temperaments section! Though it might still be useful to keep to see what temperaments are uniquely fractional w.r.t. both continua. What do you think (if you have a preference)? --Godtone (talk) 01:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

I think having half-integer temperaments is probably useful, though Fumica likely has other opinions. Lériendil (talk) 01:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

To be clear, tho I personally would prefer organizing the page with only integer n's in the first table for max cleanness, I'm fine with half integers since you guys find them useful. My main concern right now is the name of the article. FloraC (talk) 09:17, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

If that's your main point of concern feel free to rename it. Just maybe add a caution about the "gothmic"/"gothic" distinction and what it's supposed to mean? --Godtone (talk) 11:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Also pls check to update redirects to the page (so that they don't redirect you to a redirect). --Godtone (talk) 11:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)