136/135: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
You're not supposed to "recommend" one optimization method over another. Ideally we wanna keep CTE and CWE here but CEE could stay for now
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
== Temperaments ==
== Temperaments ==
=== Fiventeen ===
=== Fiventeen ===
[[17edo]] makes a good tuning (especially for its size) for the 2.3.17/5-subgroup {136/135} rank 2 temperament which implies a [[supersoft]] [[pentic]] pentad of 30:34:40:45:51:60 (because as aforementioned [[17/15]] is equated with [[9/8]]), corresponding approximately to a just [[20/17]] tuning, although [[80edo]] might be preferred for an approximately just [[51/40]] to optimize plausibility slightly more, and 80 + 17 = [[97edo]] and 97 + 17 = [[114edo]] do even better in striking a balance between 80edo's more stable tuning and that having 20/17 more accurate (as in 17edo) is useful because of the more convincing suggestion of the two 15:17:20 chords present in the fiventeen pentad. The same is true of the related rank-3 temperament diatic, described below, for which the [[optimal ET sequence]] is much more characteristic of optimized tunings, finding [[34edo]], then [[80edo]], then 34 + 80 = [[114edo]] and amazingly even 114 + 80 = [[194edo|194bc-edo]], though because of its focus on primes 5 and 17 it misses 97edo as a tuning, and slightly less optimized though still interesting [[63edo]] and 63 + 80 = [[143edo]] tunings are found in the optimal ET sequence for fiventeen.
[[17edo]] makes a good tuning (especially for its size) for the 2.3.17/5-subgroup {136/135} rank 2 temperament which implies a [[supersoft]] [[pentic]] pentad of [[~]]30:34:40:45:51:60 (because as aforementioned [[17/15]] is equated with [[9/8]]), corresponding approximately to a just [[20/17]] tuning, although [[80edo]] might be preferred for an approximately just [[51/40]] to optimize plausibility slightly more, and 80 + 17 = [[97edo]] and 97 + 17 = [[114edo]] do even better in striking a balance between 80edo's more stable tuning and that having 20/17 more accurate (as in 17edo) is useful because of the more convincing suggestion of the two 15:17:20 chords present in the fiventeen pentad. The same is true of the related rank-3 temperament diatic, described below, for which the [[optimal ET sequence]] is much more characteristic of optimized tunings, finding [[34edo]], then [[80edo]], then 34 + 80 = [[114edo]] and amazingly even 114 + 80 = [[194edo|194bc-edo]], though because of its focus on primes 5 and 17 it misses 97edo as a tuning, and slightly less optimized though still interesting [[63edo]] and 63 + 80 = [[143edo]] tunings are found in the optimal ET sequence for fiventeen.


[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.17/5
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.17/5
Line 70: Line 70:
* [[Small comma]]
* [[Small comma]]
* [[List of superparticular intervals]]
* [[List of superparticular intervals]]
[[Category:Commas with unknown etymology]]
{{todo|improve readability|inline=1|comment=Rewrite the etymology section to be easier to parse and less vague.}}

Latest revision as of 00:30, 16 November 2024

Interval information
Ratio 136/135
Factorization 23 × 3-3 × 5-1 × 17
Monzo [3 -3 -1 0 0 0 1
Size in cents 12.77669¢
Names diatisma,
diatic comma,
fiventeen comma
Color name 17og2, Sogu 2nd,
Sogu comma
FJS name [math]\displaystyle{ \text{d2}^{17}_{5} }[/math]
Special properties superparticular,
reduced
Tenney height (log2 nd) 14.1643
Weil height (log2 max(n, d)) 14.1749
Wilson height (sopfr(nd)) 37
Comma size small
S-expression S16 × S17
Open this interval in xen-calc

136/135, the diatisma, diatic comma or fiventeen comma, is a 17-limit small comma. It is the interval that separates 17/10 and 27/16 (or their octave complements 20/17 and 32/27) and that separates 30/17 and 16/9 (or their octave complements 17/15 and 9/8). It is also the difference between 16/15 and 18/17 with an S-expression of S16 × S17 or ((16/15)(17/16))/((17/16)(18/17)).

Temperaments

Fiventeen

17edo makes a good tuning (especially for its size) for the 2.3.17/5-subgroup {136/135} rank 2 temperament which implies a supersoft pentic pentad of ~30:34:40:45:51:60 (because as aforementioned 17/15 is equated with 9/8), corresponding approximately to a just 20/17 tuning, although 80edo might be preferred for an approximately just 51/40 to optimize plausibility slightly more, and 80 + 17 = 97edo and 97 + 17 = 114edo do even better in striking a balance between 80edo's more stable tuning and that having 20/17 more accurate (as in 17edo) is useful because of the more convincing suggestion of the two 15:17:20 chords present in the fiventeen pentad. The same is true of the related rank-3 temperament diatic, described below, for which the optimal ET sequence is much more characteristic of optimized tunings, finding 34edo, then 80edo, then 34 + 80 = 114edo and amazingly even 114 + 80 = 194bc-edo, though because of its focus on primes 5 and 17 it misses 97edo as a tuning, and slightly less optimized though still interesting 63edo and 63 + 80 = 143edo tunings are found in the optimal ET sequence for fiventeen.

Subgroup: 2.3.17/5

Sval mapping[1 0 -3], 0 1 3]]

sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3

Optimal tunings:

Optimal ET sequence5, 12, 17, 46, 63, 143

Diatic

Subgroup: 2.3.5.17

Sval mapping[1 0 0 -3], 0 1 0 3], 0 0 1 1]]

sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~5

Optimal tuning (subgroup CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1088, ~5/4 = 387.8544

Optimal ET sequence10, 12, 22, 34, 80, 114, 194bc

Diatismic

The only edo tuning that has less than 25% relative error for all primes in the 17-limit tempering 136/135 is 46edo, which also tunes 20/17 with less than 25% relative error and 51/40 even more accurately. If you allow 7/4 to be sharper than 25% then 80edo makes a good and more accurate tuning that extends to the 23-limit. Alternatively, if you don't care (as much) about prime 11, 68edo makes a great tuning in the no-11's 19-limit and no-11's no-29's 31-limit.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17

Mapping:

[⟨ 1 0 0 0 0 0 -3 ],
0 1 0 0 0 0 3 ],
0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ],
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ],
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ],
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ]]
sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~5, ~7, ~11, ~13

Optimal tuning (subgroup CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1088, ~5/4 = 387.8544, ~7/4, ~11/8, ~13/8

Optimal ET sequence22, 27eg, 29g, 34d, 39dfg, 41g, 46, 58, 80, 104c, 114e, 126(f), 136ef, 148d, 167g, 216bdef*

* optimal patent val: 177

Srutal archagall

Srutal archagall is an efficient rank-2 temperament tempering out both S16 and S17, which is equivalently described as charic semitonic due to the fact that {S16 × S17 , S16/S17} = {S16, S17}

Etymology

The name was formerly diatonisma, suggested by User:Xenllium in 2023, but this name has strong reasons against it due to implying an ambiguously-named "diatonic" subgroup temperament. Therefore fiventeenisma and diatisma were proposed. However, due to the need for a separate name for the rank 2 2.3.17/5 subgroup temperament and due to its relation to the chord (see Talk:136/135), the name "fiventeen" was given to the temperament and hence due to the lack of a need for "-ic/-ismic/-isma" (as that can apply to the already-short name of diatisma, itself a rename & shortenage of diatonisma) the name was shortened to just "fiventeen".

See also


Todo: improve readability

Rewrite the etymology section to be easier to parse and less vague.