Tetracot family: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
add unchanged-intervals along with eigenmonzo, per prior agreement on Xenwiki Work Group
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 18: Line 18:
: [[Eigenmonzo basis]] ([[unchanged-interval basis]]): 2.5
: [[Eigenmonzo basis]] ([[unchanged-interval basis]]): 2.5


{{Val list|legend=1| 7, 20c, 27, 34, 75, 109, 470b, 579b }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 20c, 27, 34, 75, 109, 470b, 579b }}


[[Badness]]: 0.048518
[[Badness]]: 0.048518
Line 53: Line 53:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.985
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.985


{{Val list|legend=1| 7, 27e, 34, 41, 75e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 27e, 34, 41, 75e }}


==== 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup ====
==== 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup ====
Line 66: Line 66:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 176.196
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 176.196


{{Val list|legend=1| 7, 27e, 34, 41, 75e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 27e, 34, 41, 75e }}


== Monkey ==
== Monkey ==
Line 81: Line 81:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.659
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.659


{{Val list|legend=1| 7, 27d, 34, 41, 321ccdd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 27d, 34, 41, 321ccdd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.073437
[[Badness]]: 0.073437
Line 94: Line 94:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.570
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.570


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 7, 27de, 34, 41 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 27de, 34, 41 }}


Badness: 0.038836
Badness: 0.038836
Line 107: Line 107:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.622
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.622


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 7, 27de, 34, 41 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 27de, 34, 41 }}


Badness: 0.028410
Badness: 0.028410
Line 124: Line 124:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.741
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.741


{{Val list|legend=1| 34d, 41, 116, 157c, 198c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 34d, 41, 116, 157c, 198c }}


[[Badness]]: 0.062897
[[Badness]]: 0.062897
Line 137: Line 137:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.777
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.777


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 34d, 41, 116e, 157ce }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 34d, 41, 116e, 157ce }}


Badness: 0.031332
Badness: 0.031332
Line 150: Line 150:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.886
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.886


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 34d, 41, 75e, 116ef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 34d, 41, 75e, 116ef }}


Badness: 0.024886
Badness: 0.024886
Line 165: Line 165:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.203
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.203


{{Val list|legend=1| 7, 20c, 27, 61d, 88bcd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 20c, 27, 61d, 88bcd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.068184
[[Badness]]: 0.068184
Line 178: Line 178:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.053
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.053


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 7, 20ce, 27e, 34d, 61de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 20ce, 27e, 34d, 61de }}


Badness: 0.035149
Badness: 0.035149
Line 191: Line 191:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 176.953
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 176.953


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 7, 20ce, 27e, 34d, 61de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 20ce, 27e, 34d, 61de }}


Badness: 0.023806
Badness: 0.023806
Line 211: Line 211:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.200
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.200


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 7, 20c, 27, 61dee, 88bcdee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 20c, 27, 61dee, 88bcdee }}


Badness: 0.063077
Badness: 0.063077
Line 224: Line 224:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.197
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.197


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 7, 20c, 27, 61dee, 88bcdee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 20c, 27, 61dee, 88bcdee }}


Badness: 0.039043
Badness: 0.039043
Line 241: Line 241:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.357
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.357


{{Val list|legend=1| 27, 61, 88bc, 115bc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27, 61, 88bc, 115bc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.070522
[[Badness]]: 0.070522
Line 254: Line 254:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.413
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.413


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 27e, 34, 61e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27e, 34, 61e }}


Badness: 0.037551
Badness: 0.037551
Line 267: Line 267:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.231
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.231


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 27e, 34, 61e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27e, 34, 61e }}


Badness: 0.031219
Badness: 0.031219
Line 288: Line 288:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.076
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.076


{{Val list|legend=1| 14c, 27, 41, 68, 109 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 14c, 27, 41, 68, 109 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.033845
[[Badness]]: 0.033845
Line 301: Line 301:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 87.975
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 87.975


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 27e, 41, 109e, 150e, 191e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27e, 41, 109e, 150e, 191e }}


Badness: 0.024078
Badness: 0.024078
Line 314: Line 314:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.106
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.106


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 27e, 41, 68e, 109ef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27e, 41, 68e, 109ef }}


Badness: 0.023276
Badness: 0.023276
Line 327: Line 327:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~18/17 = 88.102
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~18/17 = 88.102


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 14c, 27eg, 41, 68egg, 109efgg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 14c, 27eg, 41, 68egg, 109efgg }}


Badness: 0.021088
Badness: 0.021088
Line 340: Line 340:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~18/17 = 88.111
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~18/17 = 88.111


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 14c, 27eg, 41, 68egg, 109efgg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 14c, 27eg, 41, 68egg, 109efgg }}


Badness: 0.016652
Badness: 0.016652
Line 353: Line 353:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.179
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.179


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 27e, 41f, 68ef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27e, 41f, 68ef }}


Badness: 0.027601
Badness: 0.027601
Line 366: Line 366:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 87.697
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 87.697


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 41, 137cd, 178cd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 137cd, 178cd }}


Badness: 0.028326
Badness: 0.028326
Line 379: Line 379:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~13/9 = 643.989
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~13/9 = 643.989


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 13cdeef, 28ccdef, 41 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 13cdeef, 28ccdef, 41 }}


Badness: 0.051876
Badness: 0.051876
Line 392: Line 392:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.035
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.035


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 27, 41, 68, 109, 150, 259 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27, 41, 68, 109, 150, 259 }}


Badness: 0.039643
Badness: 0.039643
Line 405: Line 405:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.075
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.075


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 27, 41, 68, 109f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27, 41, 68, 109f }}


Badness: 0.031136
Badness: 0.031136
Line 418: Line 418:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.104
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.104


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 27, 41, 68, 109f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27, 41, 68, 109f }}


Badness: 0.026833
Badness: 0.026833
Line 431: Line 431:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~19/18 = 88.113
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~19/18 = 88.113


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 27, 41, 68, 109f, 177ffg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 27, 41, 68, 109f, 177ffg }}


Badness: 0.020511
Badness: 0.020511
Line 446: Line 446:
[[POTE generator]]: ~28/27 = 58.675
[[POTE generator]]: ~28/27 = 58.675


{{Val list|legend=1| 41, 143d, 184, 225, 409bcd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 41, 143d, 184, 225, 409bcd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.119761
[[Badness]]: 0.119761
Line 459: Line 459:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 58.665
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 58.665


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 20cde, 41 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 20cde, 41 }}


Badness: 0.059528
Badness: 0.059528
Line 472: Line 472:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~27/26 = 58.639
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~27/26 = 58.639


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 20cdef, 41 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 20cdef, 41 }}


Badness: 0.043645
Badness: 0.043645

Revision as of 16:51, 7 May 2023

The parent of the tetracot family is tetracot, the 5-limit temperament tempering out 20000/19683 = [5 -9 4, the minimal diesis or tetracot comma. The dual of this comma is the wedgie ⟨⟨ 4 9 5 ]], which tells us ~10/9 is a generator, and that four of them give ~3/2. In fact, (10/9)4 = 20000/19683 × 3/2. We also have (10/9)9 = (20000/19683)2 × 5/2. From this it is evident we should flatten the generator a bit, and 34edo does this and makes for a recommendable tuning. Another possibility is to use (5/2)1/9 for a generator. The 13-note mos gives enough space for eight triads, with the 20-note mos supplying many more.

The name comes from members of the Araucaria family of conifers, which have four cotyledons (though sometimes these are fused).

Tetracot

Subgroup: 2.3.5

Comma list: 20000/19683

Mapping: [1 1 1], 0 4 9]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 176.160

Minimax tuning:

Eigenmonzo basis (unchanged-interval basis): 2.5

Optimal ET sequence7, 20c, 27, 34, 75, 109, 470b, 579b

Badness: 0.048518

Overview to extensions

The second comma of the normal comma list defines which 7-limit family member we are looking at.

  • 875/864, the keema, gives monkey;
  • 179200/177147 (or equivalently 225/224) gives bunya;
  • 245/243 gives octacot, which splits the generator in half.

Monkey and bunya

Monkey tempers out the keema. The keema, 875/864, is the amount by which three just minor thirds fall short of 7/4, and tells us the ~7/4 of monkey is reached by three minor thirds in succession. It can be described as the 34 & 41 temperament. 41edo is an excellent tuning for monkey, and has the effect of making monkey identical to bunya with the same tuning.

Bunya adds 225/224 to the list of commas and may be described as the 34d & 41 temperament. 41edo can again be used as a tuning, in which case it is the same as monkey. However an excellent alternative is 141/26 as a generator, giving just ~7's and an improved value for ~5, at the cost of a slightly sharper, but still less than a cent sharp, fifth. Octave stretching, if employed, also serves to distinguish bunya from monkey, as its octaves should be stretched considerably less.

Since the generator in all cases is between 10/9 and 11/10, it is natural to extend these temperaments to the 11-limit by tempering out (10/9)/(11/10) = 100/99. This gives 11-limit monkey, ⟨⟨ 4 9 -15 10 … ]] and 11-limit bunya, ⟨⟨ 4 9 26 10 … ]]. Again, 41edo can be used as a tuning, making the two identical, which is also the case if we turn to the 2.3.5.11 subgroup temperament, dispensing with 7. However, 11-limit bunya, like 7-limit bunya, profits a little from a slightly sharper fifth, such as the 141/26 generator supplies, or even sharper yet, as for instance by the val 355 563 823 997 1230], with a 52/355 generator.

Since 16/13 is shy of (10/9)2 by just 325/324, it is likewise natural to extend our winning streak with these temperaments by adding this to the list of commas. This gives us ⟨⟨ 4 9 -15 10 -2 … ]] for 13-limit monkey and ⟨⟨ 4 9 26 10 -2 … ]] for 13-limit bunya. Once again, 41edo is recommended as a tuning for monkey, while bunya can with advantage tune the fifth sharper: 17\116 as a generator with a fifth a cent and a half sharp or 11\75 with a fifth two cents sharp.

2.3.5.11 subgroup

As discussed above, tetracot works well for the 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup, in which tempering out 100/99, 144/143 and 243/242.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.11

Comma list: 100/99, 243/242

Sval mapping: [1 1 1 2], 0 4 9 10]]

Gencom: [2 10/9; 100/99 243/242]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.985

Optimal ET sequence7, 27e, 34, 41, 75e

2.3.5.11.13 subgroup

Subgroup: 2.3.5.11.13

Comma list: 100/99, 144/143, 243/242

Sval mapping: [1 1 1 2 4], 0 4 9 10 -2]]

Gencom: [2 10/9; 100/99 144/143 243/242]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 176.196

Optimal ET sequence7, 27e, 34, 41, 75e

Monkey

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 875/864, 5120/5103

Mapping: [1 1 1 5], 0 4 9 -15]]

Wedgie⟨⟨ 4 9 -15 5 -35 -60 ]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.659

Optimal ET sequence7, 27d, 34, 41, 321ccdd

Badness: 0.073437

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 100/99, 243/242, 385/384

Mapping: [1 1 1 5 2], 0 4 9 -15 10]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.570

Optimal ET sequence7, 27de, 34, 41

Badness: 0.038836

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 100/99, 105/104, 144/143, 243/242

Mapping: [1 1 1 5 2 4], 0 4 9 -15 10 -2]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.622

Optimal ET sequence7, 27de, 34, 41

Badness: 0.028410

Bunya

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 225/224, 15625/15309

Mapping: [1 1 1 -1], 0 4 9 26]]

Wedgie⟨⟨ 4 9 26 5 30 35 ]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.741

Optimal ET sequence34d, 41, 116, 157c, 198c

Badness: 0.062897

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 100/99, 225/224, 243/242

Mapping: [1 1 1 -1 2], 0 4 9 26 10]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.777

Optimal ET sequence34d, 41, 116e, 157ce

Badness: 0.031332

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 100/99, 144/143, 225/224, 243/242

Mapping: [1 1 1 -1 2 4], 0 4 9 26 10 -2]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 175.886

Optimal ET sequence34d, 41, 75e, 116ef

Badness: 0.024886

Modus

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 64/63, 4375/4374

Mapping: [1 1 1 4], 0 4 9 -8]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.203

Optimal ET sequence7, 20c, 27, 61d, 88bcd

Badness: 0.068184

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 64/63, 100/99, 243/242

Mapping: [1 1 1 4 2], 0 4 9 -8 10]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.053

Optimal ET sequence7, 20ce, 27e, 34d, 61de

Badness: 0.035149

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 64/63, 78/77, 100/99, 144/143

Mapping: [1 1 1 4 2 4], 0 4 9 -8 10 -2]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 176.953

Optimal ET sequence7, 20ce, 27e, 34d, 61de

Badness: 0.023806

Music

Ponens

The error of 11 is about the same as that of modus, but flat instead of sharp, and much more abundant. Since the other primes are all sharp, however, this leads to a much larger error for other intervals involving 11.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 55/54, 64/63, 363/350

Mapping: [1 1 1 4 3], 0 4 9 -8 3]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.200

Optimal ET sequence7, 20c, 27, 61dee, 88bcdee

Badness: 0.063077

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 55/54, 64/63, 66/65, 143/140

Mapping: [1 1 1 4 3 4], 0 4 9 -8 3 -2]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.197

Optimal ET sequence7, 20c, 27, 61dee, 88bcdee

Badness: 0.039043

Wollemia

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 126/125, 2240/2187

Mapping: [1 1 1 0], 0 4 9 19]]

Wedgie⟨⟨ 4 9 19 5 19 19 ]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.357

Optimal ET sequence27, 61, 88bc, 115bc

Badness: 0.070522

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 56/55, 100/99, 243/242

Mapping: [1 1 1 0 2], 0 4 9 19 10]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.413

Optimal ET sequence27e, 34, 61e

Badness: 0.037551

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 56/55, 91/90, 100/99, 243/242

Mapping: [1 1 1 0 2 4], 0 4 9 19 10 -2]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~10/9 = 177.231

Optimal ET sequence27e, 34, 61e

Badness: 0.031219

Octacot

Octacot cuts the Gordian knot of deciding between the monkey and bunya mappings for 7 by cutting the generator in half and splitting the difference. It adds 245/243 to the normal comma list, and also tempers out 2401/2400. It may also be described as 41 & 68. 68edo or 109edo can be used as tunings, as can (5/2)1/18, which gives just major thirds. Another tuning is 150edo, which has a generator, 11\150, of exactly 88 cents. This relates octacot to the 88cET non-octave temperament, which like Carlos Alpha arguably makes more sense viewed as part of a rank-2 temperament with octaves rather than rank-1 without them.

Once again and for the same reasons, it is natural to add 100/99 and 325/324 to the list of commas, giving ⟨⟨ 8 18 11 20 -4 … ]] as the octave part of the wedgie. Generators of 3\41, 8\109 and 11\150 (88 cents) are all good choices for the 7, 11 and 13 limits.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 245/243, 2401/2400

Mapping: [1 1 1 2], 0 8 18 11]]

Wedgie⟨⟨ 8 18 11 10 -5 -25 ]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.076

Optimal ET sequence14c, 27, 41, 68, 109

Badness: 0.033845

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 100/99, 243/242, 245/242

Mapping: [1 1 1 2 2], 0 8 18 11 20]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 87.975

Optimal ET sequence27e, 41, 109e, 150e, 191e

Badness: 0.024078

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 100/99, 144/143, 196/195, 243/242

Mapping: [1 1 1 2 2 4], 0 8 18 11 20 -4]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.106

Optimal ET sequence27e, 41, 68e, 109ef

Badness: 0.023276

17-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17

Comma list: 100/99, 120/119, 144/143, 154/153, 189/187

Mapping: [1 1 1 2 2 4 3], 0 8 18 11 20 -4 15]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~18/17 = 88.102

Optimal ET sequence14c, 27eg, 41, 68egg, 109efgg

Badness: 0.021088

19-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19

Comma list: 100/99, 120/119, 133/132, 144/143, 154/153, 189/187

Mapping: [1 1 1 2 2 4 3 3], 0 8 18 11 20 -4 15 17]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~18/17 = 88.111

Optimal ET sequence14c, 27eg, 41, 68egg, 109efgg

Badness: 0.016652

Octocat

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 78/77, 91/90, 100/99, 245/242

Mapping: [1 1 1 2 2 2], 0 8 18 11 20 23]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.179

Optimal ET sequence27e, 41f, 68ef

Badness: 0.027601

Octopod

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 100/99, 105/104, 243/242, 245/242

Mapping: [1 1 1 2 2 1], 0 8 18 11 20 37]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 87.697

Optimal ET sequence41, 137cd, 178cd

Badness: 0.028326

Dificot

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 100/99, 243/242, 245/242, 343/338

Mapping: [1 9 19 13 22 19], 0 -16 -36 -22 -40 -33]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~13/9 = 643.989

Optimal ET sequence13cdeef, 28ccdef, 41

Badness: 0.051876

October

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 245/243, 385/384, 1375/1372

Mapping: [1 1 1 2 5], 0 8 18 11 -21]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.035

Optimal ET sequence27, 41, 68, 109, 150, 259

Badness: 0.039643

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 196/195, 245/243, 275/273, 385/384

Mapping: [1 1 1 2 5 4], 0 8 18 11 -21 -4]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.075

Optimal ET sequence27, 41, 68, 109f

Badness: 0.031136

17-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17

Comma list: 154/153, 170/169, 196/195, 245/243, 256/255

Mapping: [1 1 1 2 5 4 6], 0 8 18 11 -21 -4 -26]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 88.104

Optimal ET sequence27, 41, 68, 109f

Badness: 0.026833

19-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19

Comma list: 154/153, 170/169, 190/189, 196/195, 209/208, 245/243

Mapping: [1 1 1 2 5 4 6 3], 0 8 18 11 -21 -4 -26 17]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~19/18 = 88.113

Optimal ET sequence27, 41, 68, 109f, 177ffg

Badness: 0.020511

Dodecacot

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 3125/3087, 10976/10935

Mapping: [1 1 1 1], 0 12 27 37]]

Wedgie⟨⟨ 12 27 37 15 25 10 ]]

POTE generator: ~28/27 = 58.675

Optimal ET sequence41, 143d, 184, 225, 409bcd

Badness: 0.119761

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 100/99, 243/242, 1375/1372

Mapping: [1 1 1 1 2], 0 12 27 37 30]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 58.665

Optimal ET sequence20cde, 41

Badness: 0.059528

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 100/99, 196/195, 243/242, 275/273

Mapping: [1 1 1 1 2 2], 0 12 27 37 30 35]]

Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~27/26 = 58.639

Optimal ET sequence20cdef, 41

Badness: 0.043645