136/135: Difference between revisions
m increase searchability |
mNo edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Comma = yes | | Comma = yes | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''136/135''', the '''diatisma''', '''diatic comma''' or '''fiventeen comma''', is a [[17-limit]] [[small comma]]. It is | '''136/135''', the '''diatisma''', '''diatic comma''' or '''fiventeen comma''', is a [[17-limit]] [[small comma]]. It is the interval that separates [[17/10]] and [[27/16]] (or their octave complements [[20/17]] and [[32/27]]) and that separates [[30/17]] and [[16/9]] (or their octave complements [[17/15]] and [[9/8]]). It is also the difference between [[16/15]] and [[18/17]] with an [[S-expression]] of [[256/255|S16]] × [[289/288|S17]] or ((16/15)(17/16))/((17/16)(18/17)). | ||
== Temperaments == | == Temperaments == | ||
=== Fiventeen === | === Fiventeen === | ||
[[17edo]] makes a good tuning (especially for its size) for the 2.3.17/5-subgroup {136/135} rank 2 temperament which implies a [[supersoft]] [[pentic]] pentad of 30:34:40:45:51:60 (because as aforementioned [[17/15]] is equated with [[9/8]]) although [[80edo]] might be preferred for | [[17edo]] makes a good tuning (especially for its size) for the 2.3.17/5-subgroup {136/135} rank 2 temperament which implies a [[supersoft]] [[pentic]] pentad of [[~]]30:34:40:45:51:60 (because as aforementioned [[17/15]] is equated with [[9/8]]), corresponding approximately to a just [[20/17]] tuning, although [[80edo]] might be preferred for an approximately just [[51/40]] to optimize plausibility slightly more, and 80 + 17 = [[97edo]] and 97 + 17 = [[114edo]] do even better in striking a balance between 80edo's more stable tuning and that having 20/17 more accurate (as in 17edo) is useful because of the more convincing suggestion of the two 15:17:20 chords present in the fiventeen pentad. The same is true of the related rank-3 temperament diatic, described below, for which the [[optimal ET sequence]] is much more characteristic of optimized tunings, finding [[34edo]], then [[80edo]], then 34 + 80 = [[114edo]] and amazingly even 114 + 80 = [[194edo|194bc-edo]], though because of its focus on primes 5 and 17 it misses 97edo as a tuning, and slightly less optimized though still interesting [[63edo]] and 63 + 80 = [[143edo]] tunings are found in the optimal ET sequence for fiventeen. | ||
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.17/5 | [[Subgroup]]: 2.3.17/5 | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
: sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3 | : sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3 | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] | [[Optimal tuning]]s: | ||
* [[Tp tuning|subgroup]] [[CEE]]: 2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 705.440 | |||
* [[Tp tuning|subgroup]] [[CTE]]: ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1088 | |||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 5, 12, 17, 46, 63, 143 }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 5, 12, 17, 46, 63, 143 }} | ||
Line 27: | Line 29: | ||
: sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~5 | : sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~5 | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[Tp tuning|subgroup CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1088, ~5/4 = 387.8544 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[Tp tuning|subgroup]] [[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1088, ~5/4 = 387.8544 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 10, 12, 22, 34, 80, 114, 194bc }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 10, 12, 22, 34, 80, 114, 194bc }} | ||
Line 53: | Line 55: | ||
: sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~5, ~7, ~11, ~13 | : sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~5, ~7, ~11, ~13 | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[Tp tuning|subgroup CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1088, ~5/4 = 387.8544, ~7/4, ~11/8, ~13/8 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[Tp tuning|subgroup]] [[CTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1088, ~5/4 = 387.8544, ~7/4, ~11/8, ~13/8 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 22, 27eg, 29g, 34d, 39dfg, 41g, 46, 58, 80, 104c, 114e, 126(f), 136ef, 148d, 167g, 216bdef }}* | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 22, 27eg, 29g, 34d, 39dfg, 41g, 46, 58, 80, 104c, 114e, 126(f), 136ef, 148d, 167g, 216bdef }}* | ||
Line 68: | Line 70: | ||
* [[Small comma]] | * [[Small comma]] | ||
* [[List of superparticular intervals]] | * [[List of superparticular intervals]] | ||
[[Category:Commas with unknown etymology]] | |||
{{todo|improve readability|inline=1|comment=Rewrite the etymology section to be easier to parse and less vague.}} |
Latest revision as of 00:30, 16 November 2024
Interval information |
diatic comma,
fiventeen comma
Sogu comma
reduced
136/135, the diatisma, diatic comma or fiventeen comma, is a 17-limit small comma. It is the interval that separates 17/10 and 27/16 (or their octave complements 20/17 and 32/27) and that separates 30/17 and 16/9 (or their octave complements 17/15 and 9/8). It is also the difference between 16/15 and 18/17 with an S-expression of S16 × S17 or ((16/15)(17/16))/((17/16)(18/17)).
Temperaments
Fiventeen
17edo makes a good tuning (especially for its size) for the 2.3.17/5-subgroup {136/135} rank 2 temperament which implies a supersoft pentic pentad of ~30:34:40:45:51:60 (because as aforementioned 17/15 is equated with 9/8), corresponding approximately to a just 20/17 tuning, although 80edo might be preferred for an approximately just 51/40 to optimize plausibility slightly more, and 80 + 17 = 97edo and 97 + 17 = 114edo do even better in striking a balance between 80edo's more stable tuning and that having 20/17 more accurate (as in 17edo) is useful because of the more convincing suggestion of the two 15:17:20 chords present in the fiventeen pentad. The same is true of the related rank-3 temperament diatic, described below, for which the optimal ET sequence is much more characteristic of optimized tunings, finding 34edo, then 80edo, then 34 + 80 = 114edo and amazingly even 114 + 80 = 194bc-edo, though because of its focus on primes 5 and 17 it misses 97edo as a tuning, and slightly less optimized though still interesting 63edo and 63 + 80 = 143edo tunings are found in the optimal ET sequence for fiventeen.
Subgroup: 2.3.17/5
Sval mapping: [⟨1 0 -3], ⟨0 1 3]]
- sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3
Optimal ET sequence: 5, 12, 17, 46, 63, 143
Diatic
Subgroup: 2.3.5.17
Sval mapping: [⟨1 0 0 -3], ⟨0 1 0 3], ⟨0 0 1 1]]
- sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~5
Optimal tuning (subgroup CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1088, ~5/4 = 387.8544
Optimal ET sequence: 10, 12, 22, 34, 80, 114, 194bc
Diatismic
The only edo tuning that has less than 25% relative error for all primes in the 17-limit tempering 136/135 is 46edo, which also tunes 20/17 with less than 25% relative error and 51/40 even more accurately. If you allow 7/4 to be sharper than 25% then 80edo makes a good and more accurate tuning that extends to the 23-limit. Alternatively, if you don't care (as much) about prime 11, 68edo makes a great tuning in the no-11's 19-limit and no-11's no-29's 31-limit.
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17
[⟨ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 | ], |
⟨ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ], |
⟨ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ], |
⟨ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ], |
⟨ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ], |
⟨ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ]] |
- sval mapping generators: ~2, ~3, ~5, ~7, ~11, ~13
Optimal tuning (subgroup CTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~3/2 = 704.1088, ~5/4 = 387.8544, ~7/4, ~11/8, ~13/8
Optimal ET sequence: 22, 27eg, 29g, 34d, 39dfg, 41g, 46, 58, 80, 104c, 114e, 126(f), 136ef, 148d, 167g, 216bdef*
Srutal archagall
Srutal archagall is an efficient rank-2 temperament tempering out both S16 and S17, which is equivalently described as charic semitonic due to the fact that {S16 × S17 , S16/S17} = {S16, S17}
Etymology
The name was formerly diatonisma, suggested by User:Xenllium in 2023, but this name has strong reasons against it due to implying an ambiguously-named "diatonic" subgroup temperament. Therefore fiventeenisma and diatisma were proposed. However, due to the need for a separate name for the rank 2 2.3.17/5 subgroup temperament and due to its relation to the chord (see Talk:136/135), the name "fiventeen" was given to the temperament and hence due to the lack of a need for "-ic/-ismic/-isma" (as that can apply to the already-short name of diatisma, itself a rename & shortenage of diatonisma) the name was shortened to just "fiventeen".
See also