Temperament(s) for Diatonicized Chromaticism?: Horizontal vs vertical temperaments
Line 416: Line 416:


::::::::: Checking in to let you know I didn't forget about this.  In addition, I've been coming to the conclusion that while 17L 2s seems to fit with temperaments that proceed along at least part of the vertical axis of the corresponding tuning spectrum table, 11L 2s requires temperaments that proceed along the horizontal axis of the corresponding tuning spectrum table.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 01:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
::::::::: Checking in to let you know I didn't forget about this.  In addition, I've been coming to the conclusion that while 17L 2s seems to fit with temperaments that proceed along at least part of the vertical axis of the corresponding tuning spectrum table, 11L 2s requires temperaments that proceed along the horizontal axis of the corresponding tuning spectrum table.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 01:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
::::::::: Also, 256/255 currently has an edit war going on about whether its names should include "char comma", from our point of view, "char comma" would have been nice for enabling "char chroma" in tuning systems that use it as an interval instead of tempering it out.  I thought about putting this in the associated discussion page, but the edit war is going on with apparently no inclination to put any further discussion there (although plenty of old discussion about naming exists there).
::::::::: Separately, work on 17L 2s is looking like it might give me a decent 2.3.5.13.23 meantone extension (but still need to check 13th harmonic mapping stability to be sure).
::::::::: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 10:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)