User talk:Aura: Difference between revisions

Line 414:

::::::::: That's the idea. Although other parts of the 11L 2s tuning spectrum may need alternate syntonic comma/chroma analogs, just like some parts of the 5L 2s tuning spectrum are best served by 64/63 instead of 81/80. (And sorry about the typo in the [[256/255]] page.) [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 21:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::::: Checking in to let you know I didn't forget about this. In addition, I've been coming to the conclusion that while 17L 2s seems to fit with temperaments that proceed along at least part of the vertical axis of the corresponding tuning spectrum table, 11L 2s requires temperaments that proceed along the horizontal axis of the corresponding tuning spectrum table. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 01:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:07, 14 April 2025 view source Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk \| contribs) 1,167 edits m →Temperament(s) for Diatonicized Chromaticism?: Fix broken HTML symbol ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:49, 21 April 2025 view source Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk \| contribs) 1,167 edits →Temperament(s) for Diatonicized Chromaticism?: Horizontal vs vertical temperaments Newer edit →
Line 414:		Line 414:

	::::::::: That's the idea. Although other parts of the 11L 2s tuning spectrum may need alternate syntonic comma/chroma analogs, just like some parts of the 5L 2s tuning spectrum are best served by 64/63 instead of 81/80. (And sorry about the typo in the [[256/255]] page.) [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 21:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)		::::::::: That's the idea. Although other parts of the 11L 2s tuning spectrum may need alternate syntonic comma/chroma analogs, just like some parts of the 5L 2s tuning spectrum are best served by 64/63 instead of 81/80. (And sorry about the typo in the [[256/255]] page.) [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 21:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

			::::::::: Checking in to let you know I didn't forget about this. In addition, I've been coming to the conclusion that while 17L 2s seems to fit with temperaments that proceed along at least part of the vertical axis of the corresponding tuning spectrum table, 11L 2s requires temperaments that proceed along the horizontal axis of the corresponding tuning spectrum table. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 01:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)