Temperament(s) for Diatonicized Chromaticism?: Tertiaschis and NOT the Rastma
Line 409: Line 409:


::::::: Tertiaschis looks interesting.  Meanwhile, I determined that the Rastma (243/242) is NOT the right interval for differentiating 159edo from 61edo (lower on the series I noted above) — 159edo maps it correctly to 1 increment, but 61edo not only doesn't temper it out, but inflates it to 2 increments, while 98edo inverts it.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 18:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
::::::: Tertiaschis looks interesting.  Meanwhile, I determined that the Rastma (243/242) is NOT the right interval for differentiating 159edo from 61edo (lower on the series I noted above) — 159edo maps it correctly to 1 increment, but 61edo not only doesn't temper it out, but inflates it to 2 increments, while 98edo inverts it.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 18:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
::::::: Should have tried the Char comma/chroma ([[256/255]]) first.  This is tempered out in 24edo, 37edo, 61edo, and 98edo, but correctly maps to 1 increment of 159edo; it is exactly the amount by which an archagall fifth exceeds a normal fifth.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 10:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)