Xenllium
Joined 15 November 2018
| Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
== Proposal to rename 256/255 and associated 2.3.5.17 and 17-limit temperaments == | == Proposal to rename 256/255 and associated 2.3.5.17 and 17-limit temperaments == | ||
If you wouldn't mind reading the [[Talk:256/255|talk page]] for [[256/255]] for reasonings for this rename and seeming consensus on it, as you proposed the name, I was aware of the name only recently and it's a comma that is deeply important to me as a fan of [[srutal archagall]] (also describable as charic [[semitonic]]; these two descriptions and their relation to each-other are actually very important and are part of a more general mathematical pattern). Kind regards, [[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 01:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC) | If you wouldn't mind reading the [[Talk:256/255|talk page]] for [[256/255]] for reasonings for this rename and seeming consensus on it, as you proposed the name, I was aware of the name only recently and it's a comma that is deeply important to me as a fan of [[srutal archagall]] (also describable as charic [[semitonic]]; these two descriptions and their relation to each-other are actually very important and are part of a more general mathematical pattern). Kind regards, [[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 01:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
: I love the names [[semitonisma]], [[semitonic]] and [[semitonismic]] by the way, very intuitive and elegant to me and no real room for confusion that I'm aware of; a very deserved name. I just made redirects for them as I thought it was a shame they didn't already have redirects. --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 01:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC) | |||