Xenllium

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 01:26, 5 January 2024 view source Godtone (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 2,289 edits m →Proposal to rename 256/255 and associated 2.3.5.17 and 17-limit temperaments ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:14, 5 January 2024 view source Xenllium (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 4,516 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 174:		Line 174:

	: I love the names [[semitonisma]], [[semitonic]] and [[semitonismic]] by the way, very intuitive and elegant to me and no real room for confusion that I'm aware of; a very deserved name. I just made redirects for them as I thought it was a shame they didn't already have redirects. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 01:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)		: I love the names [[semitonisma]], [[semitonic]] and [[semitonismic]] by the way, very intuitive and elegant to me and no real room for confusion that I'm aware of; a very deserved name. I just made redirects for them as I thought it was a shame they didn't already have redirects. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 01:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

			:: I have proposed an alternative name for 256/255: "diasemitonisma". I disagree this comma renamed "charisma" (from ''char'', which means an 8-bit byte) for avoiding an extra confusion (already used for a temperament name of 13-limit 3def & 19). "Diasemitonisma" is a contraction of ''diatonic'', ''semitone'' and ''diaschisma'' into a single word, and also from ''dia-'' (diatonic or diaschismic) + ''semitonisma''. --[[User:Xenllium\|Xenllium]] ([[User talk:Xenllium\|talk]]) 12:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)