User:Mousemambo/Workbench: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mousemambo (talk | contribs)
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
(27 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
**[[Temperament naming]]
**[[Temperament naming]]
**[[Scale naming]]
**[[Scale naming]]
*'''[[User:Mousemambo/Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology|Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology]]'''. Near complete as of 2023-Sep-05. Might be worth moving to the wiki mainspace.
*Missing articles:
**'''Supermajor'''. Various ways the term is used, but focused on that term as a interval and chord name/category. Also, related names. Currently, it redirects to a specific usage: [[Ragismic_microtemperaments#Supermajor]]. See also: [[Extra-Diatonic Intervals]].
**Enneatonic. wtf?


==Practical tuning for beginners pages==
==Practical tuning for beginners pages==
Line 73: Line 77:


== Xenharmonic music: An introduction to 21st century tuning systems ==
== Xenharmonic music: An introduction to 21st century tuning systems ==
Current draft title: '''Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology'''
This project has been moved to its own draft page, with the title "[[User:Mousemambo/Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology|Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology]]."


This page introduces xenharmonic music theory through the terminology used by its practitioners. This outline of links can be used as a self-guided introductory course through the [[Main Page|Xenharmonic Wiki]] for beginners interested in understanding, playing or composing microtonal or [[xenharmonic music]].
== Intermediate xenharmonic music terminology ==
This is a section in early development to collect terms that don't seem fundamental enough to include in the limited space of the "Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology" but I believe seem important enough to warrant inclusion in an intermediate-level follow-up. Some might instead get incorporated into the Introduction before its first non-draft release.


Although it consists only of links, the outline is intentionally ordered to help guide people new to this subject toward a growing conceptual understanding. The purpose is to open one doorway (among many possible others) to answering the question "How can I begin learning about xenharmonic music?" Other doorways include [[Listen|listening]] to or [[Instruments|playing]] music.
The criterion for inclusion in the "introduction" — that the whole thing fit inside a one-semester academic class — doesn't hold as well here because you could make an intermediate terminology collection for each of several specialties, e.g. JI tunings, EDO tunings, [[RTT]], etc. But in the interest of continuing the idea of a survey of xenharmonic terminology, I'll eventually create sections for each specialty that seems to me at this time to be important for a survey of xenharmonic music theory areas of study, but for now this is just a hodgepodge.


This course overlaps and extends from a prerequisite of Music Theory 101, a ubiquitous first-semester college course whose material is also commonly taught to high school piano, guitar and jazz musicians. There are several excellent free online comprehensive textbooks teaching conventional Music Theory 101 ([https://musictheory.pugetsound.edu/mt21c/MusicTheory.html Music Theory for the 21st-Century Classroom], [https://viva.pressbooks.pub/openmusictheory/ Open Music Theory], [https://www.8notes.com/theory/ Music Theory]). If you work through at least the first half of one of those comprehensive courses, many of the links below to Wikipedia articles will be redundant, but you may prefer the Wikipedia route.
* [[7-limit]]
 
* [[Chord]]
'''Using this introduction'''
* [[Chord of nature]]
 
* [[Color notation]]
This course begins by reintroducing some basic music theory terms but in a xenharmonic context. That may mean they have unusual definitions, or that they're explained in a way that points toward how they're understood and used in xenharmonic musicology and music. If there is corresponding English Wikipedia page, a link is provided here to help contrast the xenharmonic perspective with the one more commonly taught in conventional music theory. However, some Wikipedia pages were created with a partly or entirely xenharmonic perspective (e.g. [[Wikipedia:Regular diatonic tuning|Regular diatonic tuning]]).
* Commas (Might better be presented as "Temperament families" with a list of important ones... Marvel, Porcupine, etc. and the commas they temper out.)
 
** [[64/63|Archytas' comma]] (aka 64/63)
This course draws a somewhat arbitrary line between "beginner" material that is included, and "intermediate" material that is not. A guideline for that distinction is that the material presented might fit within a one-semester college course. People who already have significant xenharmonic theory understanding may feel this course remains too superficial, and that much more could be added to the "Tuning system analysis and design" section (possibly a few items could be added). Unfortunately, hardly any standard introductions to music theory go deeply enough into tuning systems and temperament to provide enough of a foundation for exploring xenharmonic music theory. Therefore, this course recapitulates many introductory topics but from a xenharmonic perspective.
** [[Magic comma]] (aka 3125/3072, small diesis)
 
** [[Ptolemisma]] (aka 100/99)
Some of the articles linked to by this outline start with useful introductory material but then go deeper than the level intended by this course. In these cases, readers are encouraged to use their judgement as they read to decide when a useful depth of understanding has been reached, and then return to this outline. Revisiting deeper material later is always possible! However, at the time of this writing (Sept. 2023) some of the Xen Wiki articles lack much of a basic introduction at all (i.e. one without college math). In those cases, if there is a Wikipedia link provided you're encouraged to visit there. But one reason for developing this outline is to identify and remedy those articles, so perhaps by the time you read this some helpful wiki editors will have remedied the problem.
** [[49/48|Slendro diesis]] (aka 49/48, large septimal diesis)
 
* [[Comma pump]]
'''Other doorways to understanding'''
* [[Comma pump examples]]
 
* [[Comparison of mode notation systems]]
Although there is no "listening guide" for this course, you will find links to YouTube videos that provide some of that valuable experience. But note that links in the "Articles" and "Videos" sections are related and supporting, but outside the flow of the course. If you play or wish to learn an [[Instruments|musical instrument capable of microtonality,]] you may find opportunities to play as you progress here.
* [[Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic]]
 
* [[Distributional evenness]]
Finally, some people prefer to "learn microtonal music" mostly by listening to music, so this outline will probably not be useful for them. That's OK! There are [[Listen|other resources]] for you. For many of us, though, a progressive structure like this outline is how we learn best.
* [[Extended bra-ket notation]]
 
* [[Extended-diatonic interval names]]
=== Foundations ===
* [[Extension and restriction]]
*What is [[Xenharmonic music|microtonal or xenharmonic music]]? Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Microtonal music|Microtonal music]].
* [[Extra-Diatonic Intervals]]
**Scott McCormick. [https://blog.discmakers.com/2017/08/microtones-the-notes-between-the-notes/ Microtones: the notes between the notes].
* [[Gallery of just intervals]]
**[[User:SyntheticThought|Michael W. Dean]]. [https://producelikeapro.com/blog/getting-started-making-microtonal-music/ Making microtonal music is easier than you’d think]. Also [[Making Microtonal Music is Easier Than You’d Think|archived at the Xen wiki]].
* [[Hexany]]
**Dave Tremblay. [https://www.heavyblogisheavy.com/2016/10/18/beyond-the-veil-behold-the-xenharmonic-or-understanding-microtonal-music/ Beyond the veil: Behold the xenharmonic, or, understanding microtonal music].
* [[Isoharmonic chord]]
**Philip Mantione. [https://theproaudiofiles.com/microtones/ Intro to microtonality (+ Interview with Brendan Byrnes)].
* [[Just intonation subgroup]]
**[[Misconceptions about xenharmony]]
* [[List of superparticular intervals]]
**[[Kyle Gann]]. [https://www.kylegann.com/AntiJI.html Combatting anti-just-intonation propaganda].
* [[Nonoctave|Nonoctave scales]]
**Kyle Gann. [https://www.kylegann.com/JIreasons.html My idiosyncratic reasons for using just intonation].
* [[Notation]]
**[[What is microtonal music]]
* [[Pergen]]
**[[Why microtonality|Why microtonality?]] And some [[:Category:Why microtonality?|responses]].
* [[Scale index]]
*[[Glossary]]
**[[5edo]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Equal temperament#Five-, seven-, and nine-tone temperaments in ethnomusicology|Equal temperament§Five-, seven-, and nine-tone temperaments in ethnomusicology]]
*[[Interval]] and [[Interval region]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Interval (music)|Interval (music)]].
**[[22edo]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:22 equal temperament|22 equal temperament]].
*[[Ratio]] and [[Interval size measure]]
**[[Mavila]]
*[[Harmonic series]] and the [[Overtone scale]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Harmonic series (music)|Harmonic series (music)]].
**[[Superpyth]]
*[[Scale]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Scale (music)|Scale (music)]].
**[[Mode]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Mode (music)|Mode (music)]].
**[[Harmonic limit]]. This article badly needs a non-mathematical introductory summary paragraph. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Limit (music)|Limit (music)]].
**[[Scale naming]]
**[[5L 2s]] (aka [[Diatonic]]). Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Diatonic scale|Diatonic scale]] and [[Wikipedia:Regular diatonic tuning|Regular diatonic tuning]].
**[[MOS scale]] (Moment of Symmetry)
**[[Mosstep]] & [[Mosdegree]]
**[[Periods and generators]]
**[[Equave]] (aka [[Equivalence interval]]), contrast with [[Period]] and [[Periodic scale]].
*[[Tonic]]
*Videos
**[[Sevish]]. [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL65EDA7FBA5F8A3CF Learn about microtonal music]. YouTube (playlist).
**... more to be added
 
=== Tuning systems and temperament ===
*[[Tuning system]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Musical tuning#Tuning systems|Musical tuning § Tuning systems]].
*[[3-limit]] & [[5-limit]]
*[[Just intonation]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Just intonation|Just intonation]].
*[[Comma]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Comma (music)|Comma]].
**[[Pythagorean comma]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Pythagorean comma|Pythagorean comma]].
**[[81/80]] (aka, Ptolemaic comma). Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Syntonic comma|Syntonic comma]].
*[[Temperament]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Musical temperament|Musical temperament]].
**[[Equal temperament]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Equal temperament|Equal temperament]].
**[[Equal-step tuning]]
**[[Regular temperament]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Regular temperament|Regular temperament]].
**[[Linear temperament]]
**[[Support]]
**[[Tempering out]]
**[[Temperament naming]]
**[[Temperament families and clans]]
*Notable historical and common tuning systems
**[[Pythagorean tuning]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Pythagorean tuning|Pythagorean tuning]].
**[[Meantone family]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Meantone temperament|Meantone temperament]].
***Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Ptolemy's intense diatonic scale|Ptolemy's intense diatonic scale]].
***[[Quarter-comma meantone]].  Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Quarter-comma meantone|Quarter-comma meantone]].
**[[12edo]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:12 equal temperament|12 equal temperament]].
**
*Articles
**[[Kyle Gann]]. [https://www.kylegann.com/tuning.html Just intonation explained].
**[[Kyle Gann]]. [https://www.kylegann.com/histune.html An introduction to historical tunings].
**Pierre Lewis. [https://leware.net/temper/temper.htm Understanding temperaments].
**Chris Morda. [https://microtonal-guitar.com/tutorial/microtonal-guitar-tutorial-overview/ Microtonal guitar tutorial overview].
**[[Margo Schulter]]. [http://www.medieval.org/emfaq/harmony/pyth.html Pythagorean tuning and Medieval polyphony].
** [[Tall Kite]]. [https://www.tallkite.com/AlternativeTunings.html Alternative tunings: Theory, notation and practice].
**[[Paul Erlich]]. [[:File:MiddlePath2015.pdf|A middle path between just intonation and the equal temperaments]].
**[[Links#Educational websites|Links § Educational websites]]
*Videos
**... to be added
 
=== Tuning system analysis and design ===
*[[Tuning system design]]. A needed article explaining some of the (sometimes conflicting) qualities that make a tuning system attractive, e.g. many consonant intervals, attractive harmonies, easy modulation to other keys, similarity to existing popular tunings, etc. Some possible qualities:
**Correspondence to the [[harmonic series]], especially the fifth and/or third. Harmonic sounds are perceived by humans as more sonorous, in part due to harmonic blending.
**Includes many close-to-harmonic fifths among intervals of the scale's (or possible scale in the tuning) notes.
**Is an [[EDO]] with the useful properties of those (modulation is relatively easy, for example).
**Is a [[MOS scale]] (many scales that people have found attractive for making music happen to be MOS scales).
**Has enough corresponding scale degrees with 12edo that it is possible to compose in it using music theoretic understanding from Common Practice theory (e.g. [[19edo]]).
**Is an EDO close enough to a popular temperament to substitute for it, e.g. [[19edo]] for [[1/3-comma meantone]].
**Has few enough pitches per [[equave]] that there's no need to select a subset for mapping to standard piano format controllers.
**A tonal quality, or set of available tonal qualities, that appeals to the composer and listener.
*[[Harmonic lattice diagram]]
*[[Tonality diamond]]. Unfortunately, the current (2023-09-04) Xen Wiki page doesn't present the common meaning of the term, providing instead only some off-putting advanced math. However, it does offer a link to the [[Tonalsoft Encyclopedia]] article for [http://www.tonalsoft.com/enc/t/tonality-diamond.aspx tonality diamond], which is closer to what we really need here but with a simpler and cohesive accompanying explanation for what it is and how its used.
*[[Generator]]
*[[Monzo]]
*[[Val]]
*[[Mapping]]
*[[TAMNAMS]]
*[[Ups and downs notation]]
*[[Tour of regular temperaments]]
*Notable xenharmonic tuning systems for beginners
**[[19edo]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:19 equal temperament|19 equal temperament]].
**[[24edo]] (aka, quarter tone scale). Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Quarter tone|Quarter tone]].
**[[31edo]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:31 equal temperament|31 equal temperament]].
**[[53edo]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:53 equal temperament|53 equal temperament]].
**[[Porcupine]]
**[[Bohlen-Pierce scale]]
*Articles
**[[Mike Sheiman's Very Easy Scale Building From The Harmonic Series Page]]
**Siggy. A Trivial Knot (blog). [https://freethoughtblogs.com/atrivialknot/2022/06/07/xenharmonic-music-theory-part-1-perception-of-microtones/ Xenharmonic music theory part 1: Perception of microtones], part 2: [https://freethoughtblogs.com/atrivialknot/2022/06/13/xenharmonic-music-theory-part-2-dissonance-theory/ Dissonance Theory], part 3: [https://freethoughtblogs.com/atrivialknot/2022/06/16/xenharmonic-music-theory-part-3-tuning-theory/ Tuning theory]
**[[Kraig Grady]]. [http://anaphoria.com/wilsonintroMOS.html Introduction to Erv Wilson's moments of symmetry].
**[[Dave Keenan & Douglas Blumeyer's guide to RTT: introductions]]
**[[Mike's lectures on regular temperament theory]]
**[[User:Aura/Aura's Music Theory: Introduction|Aura's music theory: Introduction]]
*Videos
**... to be added
 
=== Xenharmonic harmony ===
*[[Dyad]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Dyad (music)|Dyad (music)]].
*[[Interval quality]]
*[[Consonance and dissonance]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Consonance and dissonance|Consonance and dissonance]].
*[[Diatonic functional harmony]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Function (music)|Function (music)]].
*[[Just intonation harmony]] (or [[Harmony in just intonation]]). This needed article would present an introduction to creating harmony in just intonation (JI) tunings. It introduces ideas and strategies for harmony that also apply to other uneven tunings, and provides a foundation for understanding more extended xenharmonic harmonization. It should emphasize the important explicit and implicit harmonic qualities of arpeggiation, counterpoint, and dyadic harmony in JI and other non-regular tunings. Some ideas to include...
**In ancient music, "pure" tunings based on lower harmonic series overtones (e.g. Pythagorean, aka 3-limit) were understood to mostly support only limited dyadic harmony, because few intervals in any purely JI tuning were considered acceptably consonant. Singing and playing in unison was typical. Interval table analysis of an example 3-limit JI tuning (see table; to be added) reveals how many of that tunings' dyadic intervals are unusable for harmony. Triads that are consonant — by traditional measure — are unavailable in ancient JI tunings.
**However, many traditional cultural musics successfully integrated dyadic harmony, e.g. ancient Greek music and its early European descendants, traditional Middle Eastern music, traditional classical Chinese music, and some traditional African music. The commitment to 3-limit tunings at this time was essentially ideological, reinforced by the strong human tendency to hear unfamiliar tunings as "wrong."
**The expansion of JI tunings from 3-limit (Pythagorean) to 5-limit (e.g. Ptolemaic) increased the number of intervals considered consonant, and therefore the harmonic possibilities in these tunings. Although options for triadic harmony were still limited compared to later developments, the strongly consonant Ptolemaic just major triad and some other consonant triads became available. Nevertheless, harmony through the European Medieval period remained mostly limited to fifths and fourths in parallel motion, with some experimentation.
**Melodic arpeggiation, ostinato, and the introduction of early basso continuo accompaniment, provided composers with a conceptual doorway to more sophisticated harmonic ideas in early European JI music, without the more obvious dissonance of nearby-pitched notes sounded simultaneously. The developing popularity of counterpoint in Medieval melody also encouraged considering more complex harmony.
**Subsequently, the abandonment of pure intonation for newly developed [[Wikipedia:Meantone temperament|meantone temperaments]] in European Renaissance music greatly enlarged the set of acceptably consonant intervals (e.g. [[Wikipedia:List_of_meantone_intervals|List of meantone intervals]]), while listeners also became more accepting of less pure intervals as consonant (continuing into the 20th century [[Wikipedia:Emancipation of the dissonance|Emancipation of the dissonance]]). This allowed expansion and exploration of triadic and larger harmonies. These tempered tunings also permitted some key modulation on fixed-pitch instruments like piano.
**Some contemporary composers have been rediscovering the attractive tonality of pure harmony and its deeply consonant quality. People only familiar with the advantages of ubiquitous equal temperament may initially find composing in just intonation is notably constrained because many intervals are unavailable due to dissonance, reducing its harmonic possibilities. However, constraints in artistic work can also inspire creative solutions. One of the charms of composing in a new tuning system is learning what works well in it, and expresses its tonality with enough beauty that the listener doesn't realize what the composer has worked to avoid. It's also worth considering that humans have composed music in just intonation for thousands of years, although nearly all of it has been lost.
*[[Dyadic chord]]
*Harmony in specific tunings
**[[24edo interval names and harmonies]]
**[[Blacksmith temperament modal harmony (in 15edo)]]
**[[Harmony of 23edo]]
*Articles
**[[Margo Schulter]]. Pythagorean tuning and Medieval polyphony § [http://www.medieval.org/emfaq/harmony/pyth5.html Pythagorean tuning and Gothic polyphony].
**[[User:Aura/Aura's Ideas on Functional Harmony|Aura's Ideas on functional harmony]]‎‎
**[[User:FloraC/Analysis on the 13-limit just intonation space: episode ii#Chapter VI. Overview on Functional Harmony|FloraC's Overview on functional harmony]]
*Videos
**... to be added


==Elements of good Xenharmonic Wiki article writing==
==Elements of good Xenharmonic Wiki article writing==
Line 243: Line 140:
**What is an explanation and what are some types of explanation?
**What is an explanation and what are some types of explanation?
**Effective narrative structure in nonfiction writing.
**Effective narrative structure in nonfiction writing.
**Tone in writing: Encyclopedic, authoritative, monographic, conversational, informal, comedic, etc.
**Tone in writing: Encyclopedic, authoritative, monographic, conversational, telegraphic, informal, comedic, etc.
**Recommended reading for learning how to write better nonfiction (to be added).
**Recommended reading for learning how to write better nonfiction:
***[https://www.grammarly.com/blog/paragraph-structure/ Paragraph structure: How to write strong paragraphs]. Grammarly (blog).
***[https://www.grammarly.com/blog/paragraphs/ The ultimate guide to paragraphs]. Grammarly (blog).
***[https://www.grammarly.com/blog/body-paragraph/ How to write the perfect body paragraph]. Grammarly (blog)
***William Zinsser. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources?isbn=978-0060891541 On Writing Well].
***Peter Elbow. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources?isbn=978-0195120189 Writing With Power].


*'''Every Xenharmonic Wiki article should include...'''
*'''Every Xenharmonic Wiki article should include...'''
**An introductory paragraph or two that:
**An introductory paragraph or two that:
***Is accessible to the Wiki's yet-to-be-officially defined target audience: musicians with at least a basic introduction to music theory. This can be defined as first-semester, college Music Theory 101, but is also commonly introduced to high-school piano, guitar, and jazz musicians.
***Is accessible to the Wiki's not-actually-officially-defined target audience of beginners: musicians with at least a basic introduction to music theory. This can be defined as first-semester, college Music Theory 101, but is also commonly introduced to high-school piano, guitar, and jazz musicians.
***Provides links to beginner and intermediate-level articles on music theory as needed.
***Provides links to beginner and intermediate-level articles on conventional or xenharmonic music theory as needed.
***Clearly places the article's topic into the context of music.
***Clearly places the article's topic into the context of music.
***Presents the purpose of the article in a way that will be understood by someone completely new to the article's concept, with links to articles about concepts that are necessary prerequisites.
***Presents the purpose of the article in a way that will be understood by someone completely new to the article's concept, with links to articles about concepts that are necessary prerequisites.
***Regardless of the topic (advanced or not), includes absolutely no math theory terminology beyond high school level, unless it is very commonly used in Xenharmonic music discussions, and links to/toward beginner-level articles are provided. If no such article exists, omit that terminology from the introduction, and present it later with a red link to create that article. There are certainly also alternative ways to address the serious Xenharmonic Wiki problem of inaccessible articles that understandably frighten off musicians without a higher math degree. There are occasional paired articles, one for beginners (e.g. [[Mapping]]) and one for advanced readers (e.g. [[Temperament mapping matrices]]). This can be an effective approach but requires substantially more work.
***Regardless of the topic (advanced or not), includes absolutely no math theory terminology beyond high school level, unless it is very, very commonly used in Xenharmonic music discussions, and links to/toward beginner-level articles are provided. If no such article exists, omit that terminology from the introduction, and present it later with a redlink to create that article. There are certainly also alternative ways to address the serious Xenharmonic Wiki problem of inaccessible articles that understandably frighten off musicians without a higher math degree. There are occasional paired articles, one for beginners (e.g. [[Mapping]]) and one for advanced readers (e.g. [[Temperament mapping matrices]]) — see [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Beginner|list of beginner pages]]/[[:Category:Beginner pages|Category:Beginner page]]<nowiki/>s, [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Expert|list of expert pages]]/[[:Category:Expert pages|Category:Expert pages]]. This can be an effective approach but requires substantially more work.
**Sections that divide the article into different depths of understanding, i.e. that require the reader to have less or more preexisting understandings. More advanced understandings belong in sections later in the article. This is true even formore advanced articles, because in effective narrative nonfiction writing there is always a progression of understanding.
**Sections that divide the article into different depths of understanding, i.e. that require the reader to have less or more preexisting understandings. More advanced understandings belong in sections later in the article. This is true even for more advanced articles, because in effective narrative nonfiction writing there is always a progression of understanding. Some possible terms for the non-math/math sectional division (these can be mixed and matched): Elementary/Technical, Basic/Advanced, Fundamental/Detailed. Some great examples of presenting complex topics in several levels of understanding can be found the YouTube series [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLibNZv5Zd0dyCoQ6f4pdXUFnpAIlKgm3N 5 Levels], from Wired.
**No list or table without an effective explanation of its contents.
**No list or table without an effective explanation of its contents.
**It might be reasonable to use the [[:Category:Todo|Category:Todo]] tags to mark articles that need a plain-language introductory paragraph. However, there several possible Todo tags that might apply and perhaps should be merged: [[:Category:Todo:add introduction|Todo:add introduction]] or [[:Category:Todo:intro|Todo:intro]] or [[:Category:Todo:improve synopsis|Todo:improve synopsis]]. Does Todo:intro mean something different from Todo:improve synopsis? See the discussion at [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do#Plain-language writing|Things to do § Plain-language writing]].
**Unfortunately, there are so many Xen Wiki articles that are missing an accessible introduction paragraph that it's hard to know how to begin such a monumental task. As part of a solution to this obstacle, I've put together an outline of specific articles as an "[[User:Mousemambo/Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology|Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology]]" that I believe are foundational for people just starting out in xenharmonic music theory. These articles are a good target set for beginner accessibility and readability improvement.
**Wiki sample/examples (to provide some idea of what kind of improvements would be helpful):
***Consider the first paragraph of the "[[Porcupine family]]" article as of 2023-Sep-06, which never actually states what the "porcupine family" actually is (what's missing: it's a [[Temperament families and clans|temperament family]]). This is not and uncommon problem: "The [[5-limit]] parent [[comma]] for the '''porcupine family''' is [[250/243]], the maximal diesis or porcupine comma. Its [[monzo]] is [1 -5 3⟩, and flipping that yields ⟨⟨3 5 1]] for the [[wedgie]]. This tells us the [[generator]] is a minor whole tone, the [[10/9]] interval, and that three of these add up to a perfect fourth ([[4/3]]), with two more giving the minor sixth ([[8/5]]). In fact, (10/9)<sup>3</sup> = 4/3 × 250/243, and (10/9)<sup>5</sup> = 8/5 × (250/243)<sup>2</sup>. [[22edo|3\22]] is a very recommendable generator, and [[Mos scale|mos scales]] of 7, 8 and 15 notes make for some nice scale possibilities."
***The version modified for clarity is: "The porcupine family is the [[rank]]-2 [[Temperament families and clans|family of temperaments]] whose [[5-limit]] parent [[comma]] is [[250/243]], also called the maximal diesis or porcupine comma.¶ Its [[monzo]]...."
*'''Every Xenharmonic Wiki article about a specific tuning''' should ideally include an early section about the advantages (and probably disadvantages too) of that tuning for composing music. Contrast the article [[19edo]] that includes that information, with the article [[31edo]] that doesn't. You can find the missing 31edo info at an outside article, "[https://31et.com/page/why-31-et Why 31-ET?]" Of course when a tuning is newly developed people may not know any compositional advantages or disadvantages. But any tuning that has a fair bit of music written for it is ready to have that evaluative information added. This would greatly aid readers and especially composers who are curious where to start. An approach to addressing this wiki issue might be to use the tag [[:Category:Todo:explain its xenharmonic value|Todo:explain its xenharmonic value]] to mark pages that need this info. See the discussion of Category & Template tags at [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do#Plain-language writing|Things to do § Plain-language writing]].


==Wiki Toolkit==
==Wiki Toolkit==
Line 267: Line 175:
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Wikifuture]]
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Wikifuture]]
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Things to do]] [also its [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do|Discussion page]]]
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Things to do]] [also its [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do|Discussion page]]]
*Useful category links
*Useful category links and their corresponding template for tagging articles. To tag an article for category inclusion, add to its bottom after a blank line: <nowiki>[[category:todo:intro]]</nowiki> (for example).
**[[:Category:Stubs]]
**[[:Category:Stubs]] (generally use [[Template:Stub]] instead so that an infobox gets automatically added)
**[[:Category:Todo]]
**[[:Category:Todo]]
**[[:Category:Todo:expand]]
***[[:Category:Todo:add introduction|Todo:add introduction]]
**[[Special:RecentChanges]]
***[[:Category:Todo:improve synopsis|Todo:improve synopsis]] (improve intro)
***[[:Category:Todo:intro|Todo:intro]] (poorly defined category from early wiki days; do not use)
***[[:Category:Todo:explain its xenharmonic value|Todo:explain its xenharmonic value]] (as of 2023-Sep-07 the only articles with this tag are bios)
***[[:Category:Todo:expand|Todo:expand]]
***[[:Category:Todo:improve readability|Todo:improve readability]]
***[[:Category:Todo:simplify|Todo:simplify]]
**[[:Category:Inaccessible pages|Category:Inaccessible pages]] | Or preferably, use [[Template:Inaccessible]] which both adds an article to this category and also adds a gentle warning message box to the article's head.
**[[:Category:Beginner pages|Category:Beginner pages]]
**[[:Category:Expert pages|Category:Expert pages]]
*Wiki editing reminders
*Wiki editing reminders
**[[Help:Editing]]
**[[Help:Editing]]
Line 278: Line 194:
**[[wikipedia:Help:Cheatsheet|Help:Cheatsheet]] (@Wikipedia)
**[[wikipedia:Help:Cheatsheet|Help:Cheatsheet]] (@Wikipedia)
**[[Help:Template|Xen wiki Templates]]
**[[Help:Template|Xen wiki Templates]]
***[[Template:Wikipedia]] | Use <code><nowiki>{{Wikipedia}}</nowiki></code> when the article titles exactly match, else<code><nowiki>{{Wikipedia|page title on Wikipedia}}</nowiki></code>
***[[Template:Beginner]]
***[[Template:Expert]]
***[[Template:Stub]]
***[[:Category:Hidden_categories]]
***[[:Category:Hidden_categories]]
***[[:Category:Templates]]
***[[:Category:Templates]]
***[[:Category:Message boxes|Message boxes]]
***[[:Category:Message boxes|Message boxes]] | [[Template:Mbox]] (general-purpose message box)
***[[Special:UncategorizedTemplates|Uncategorized templates]]
***[[Special:UncategorizedTemplates|Uncategorized templates]]
***[[Special:UnusedTemplates|Unused templates]]
***[[Special:UnusedTemplates|Unused templates]]
***Might be especially useful: [[Template:Mbox]], [[Template:Stub]], [[Template:Wikipedia]], [[Template:ScaleWorkshop]], [[Template:Todo]] (and see [[:Category:Todo]] for already defined ToDo tasks)
***Might be especially useful: [[Template:Mbox]], [[Template:Stub]], [[Template:Wikipedia]], [[Template:ScaleWorkshop]], [[Template:Todo]] (and see [[:Category:Todo]] for already defined ToDo tasks)
***[[Help:Disambiguation]]
****[[Template:Main]]
****[[Template:See also]]
****[[Template:About]]
****[[Template:Distinguish]]
****[[Template:Redirect-distinguish]]
****[[wikipedia:Help:Redirect|Help:REDIRECT]] (Wikipedia)
**Wikipedia link format. As a Xenharmonic Wiki link in the visual editor... Wikipedia:<articleName>
**Wikipedia link format. As a Xenharmonic Wiki link in the visual editor... Wikipedia:<articleName>
**Xenharmonic Wiki file format. :File:<filename>
**Embedded image file (e.g. [[Help:Pictures]]). File:<filename> | E.g. <nowiki>[[File:The_Scale_Tree.png|alt=The Scale Tree.png|800x1023px|The Scale Tree.png]]</nowiki>
*Wiki health
*Wiki health
**[[:Category:Xenharmonic Wiki]]
**[[:Category:Xenharmonic Wiki]]
Line 294: Line 221:
**[https://www.facebook.com/groups/xenharmonic2/ Xenharmonic Alliance: Microtonal Music Forum] @ facebook
**[https://www.facebook.com/groups/xenharmonic2/ Xenharmonic Alliance: Microtonal Music Forum] @ facebook
**[https://www.facebook.com/groups/xenwiki Xenwiki Work Group] @ facebook
**[https://www.facebook.com/groups/xenwiki Xenwiki Work Group] @ facebook
**[[Special:RecentChanges]]
**[[Special:Log/newusers|User creation log]]
**[[Special:Log/move|Move log]]
**[[Special:Log/delete|Delete log]]
**[https://en.xen.wiki/w/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&creationSort=1&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=50 Sysops]
**[https://en.xen.wiki/w/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&creationSort=1&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=50 Sysops]


==All user sub-pages==
==All user sub-pages==
{{Special:Prefixindex|prefix=User:Mousemambo/|hideredirects=1|stripprefix=1}}
{{Special:Prefixindex|prefix=User:Mousemambo/|hideredirects=1|stripprefix=1}}

Latest revision as of 14:10, 20 March 2025

Mousemambo's workbench for ideas and projects. Questions? Please use his Talk page or contact him through XenHarmonic Alliance's Discord server #wiki channel (though he frequently takes weeks-long breaks from participating there).

Created or substantially revised pages

Project ideas

  • "Tuning methods" Project
    • User:Mousemambo/Tuning methods. Add this new major page (or set of pages). I will note that there are excellent existing resources, like the Making Microtonal Music is Easier Than You’d Think page archived here from its original source. The problem with these is that they go out of date easily. Therefore, I am proposing a wiki solution that will be available for community maintenance including significant updates as appropriate.
    • See the section "Practical tuning for beginners pages" below for a list of what's currently available on the topic at this wiki and a few outside links.
    • To better understand how the "Tuning methods" document would work with a(the) planned how-to guide(s), I have started one example how-to guide tentatively titled "Guide to Tuning a Software Synth in a DAW" using Surge XT and Reaper as (primary) examples.
    • New article Scala tuning system. It's currently a draft outline that needs to be filled in, in part with material from the significantly flawed, sometimes simply wrong, material in User:Mousemambo/Document 2 draft. Lots of work.
    • Edit and move content from the stream-of-consciousness "Tuning base, tuning center, and tonic" (Document 2 draft) user-space page into the Scala tuning system article that's currently an outline.
    • The existing "Anamark tuning file format" page should be replaced with a redirect to a "File format" section in a new "Anamark tuning file" page.
    • Add "See: Tuning file" (or See: Tuning methods) as appropriate in the articles that currently reference them.
    • Add some "how to" information for people just beginning their journey, either as additions to existing pages or by creating new ones as appropriate. E.g. How to use tuning files, how to select which ones, how to get your electronic or software instrument to use one. These types of pages live in Category:Guides.
    • Category: Tuning methods. A category that would encompass all articles about how electronic instruments are made to adhere to alternative (non-12-EDO) tunings. "Practical tuning" or "Tuning practices" or Tuning mechanisms" or "Tuning technique" (currently in use but deprecated with redirect) or "Tuning practice" are alternatives perhaps? I note that the current Category:Tuning is about the theoretical side and not at all the practical side. However, it might instead be best to stick everything in Tuning, practical and theoretical, although that's not the direction I currently lean toward. I'd rather see "Tuning methods" offered as a category on the Category:Tuning page, and hide all the "methods" pages in there.
  • Indian music (User:Mousemambo/Indian music). Replace the existing article "Indian" which, by the way, has a strange and dismaying page title (see below). Provide some history and current usage of tuning selections in the various branches of Indian music, and links to outside information. See the "Indian music" section below for a review of what this wiki already has on the topic.
  • Scale naming. How are scales named? Are there existing conventions in the Xen community. Note a Discord discussion regarding square brackets used in scale names. Note the existing Temperament names page. Some related pages are:
  • Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology. Near complete as of 2023-Sep-05. Might be worth moving to the wiki mainspace.
  • Missing articles:

Practical tuning for beginners pages

Below is a list of existing Xen wiki pages (still expanding by search, as of August 2023) relevant to beginners who want to set their electronic instruments to other than 12-EDO tuning. Synth/sampler manuals frequently don't provide enough background information, instead assuming you already know something about tuning files.

It's useful to consider the trajectory of beginners newly arriving at the wiki. The wiki's front page has a section "If you are new to musical tuning" that doesn't get into practical how-to issues, but the page also has a very appropriate and helpful section "Practical xenharmonics" (Useful Tools, List of microtonal software plugins, Microtonal instruments). "Useful tools" simply redirects to the "List of music software" page, which seems sensible if inconsistent.

Related to that visitor's initial likely trajectory, note that the wiki's main sidebar also includes a section "Practice" with links underneath to some essential starting points for people seeking practical tuning guidance, especially "Software" and (of less relevance to this work) "Pedagogy." Also in that sidebar, "Useful Tools" (redirects to List of music software) is listed under "Theory" which is odd unless you know how useful the "practice" tools are for better understanding theory.

Also, there are some not (yet) totally outdated pages out beyond the Xenharmonic wiki that are worth learning from:

Indian music

Existing pages addressing microtonality in various branches of Indian music (e.g. Hindustani classical, Hindustani semi-classical, Carnatic classical, Sikh, Odissi, filmi, etc.):

There is some movement in the music world for moving away from referring to "Indian music" as a broad category, and toward instead referring to South Asian music. This is to distinguish the music primarily or entirely found within the country of India from (admittedly closely related) traditional/classical/artistic, folk, and contemporary music found in the South Asia region but outside India itself. I wouldn't say that movement is strong, but it has a point.

I note that under Category:Traditions all the cultural traditions (not just Indian) are named with strange and somewhat dismaying names that omit the word "music" that should follow. E.g. Indian, Arabic and Greek should sensibly be Indian music, Arabic music, and Greek music. The words "Indian," "Arabic," and "Greek" by themselves can mean a people, a culture, or (except for Indian) a language. I believe that these page names and category names should specify "music" or "microtonality" or something else specific. Wikipedia (which this is not) follows WP:Noun.

Xenharmonic music: An introduction to 21st century tuning systems

This project has been moved to its own draft page, with the title "Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology."

Intermediate xenharmonic music terminology

This is a section in early development to collect terms that don't seem fundamental enough to include in the limited space of the "Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology" but I believe seem important enough to warrant inclusion in an intermediate-level follow-up. Some might instead get incorporated into the Introduction before its first non-draft release.

The criterion for inclusion in the "introduction" — that the whole thing fit inside a one-semester academic class — doesn't hold as well here because you could make an intermediate terminology collection for each of several specialties, e.g. JI tunings, EDO tunings, RTT, etc. But in the interest of continuing the idea of a survey of xenharmonic terminology, I'll eventually create sections for each specialty that seems to me at this time to be important for a survey of xenharmonic music theory areas of study, but for now this is just a hodgepodge.

Elements of good Xenharmonic Wiki article writing

Here is an outline of some ideas about how to make the Xenharmonic Wiki more useful to musicians by improving the article quality.

  • Introduction to good nonfiction writing (with an emphasis on exposition)
    • Why are you writing?
    • What is "good" in good nonfiction writing?
      • Clarity of purpose: Strong focus on the idea being presented.
      • Clarity of statement: Intelligibility in the contexts of reader and meaning.
      • Clarity of structure: A nonfiction narrative arc.
    • How to write an effective nonfiction paragraph or "paragraphic" section (a section functioning like a paragraph).
      • Each paragraph presents one idea.
      • Paragraphs include:
        • Always, an initial statement of the idea.
        • Optionally, the definition of a new term.
        • Almost always, how the idea connects to previously presented ideas (provides context).
        • Optionally, how the idea connects to related ideas outside this writing (provides context).
        • Always, sentence(s) that develop(s) the idea.
        • Always, sentence(s) that support(s) the idea.
        • Always, an explanation of why the idea is valuable.
        • Usually, a summary of what the paragraph has presented.
        • Optionally, a description of how this idea connects to the next idea(s) to be presented.
      • Edit your paragraphs to analyze what functions every sentence is providing (see above), simplify wording and phrasing, use natural speech, remove unhelpful redundancy, create powerful flow between paragraphs.
    • What is an explanation and what are some types of explanation?
    • Effective narrative structure in nonfiction writing.
    • Tone in writing: Encyclopedic, authoritative, monographic, conversational, telegraphic, informal, comedic, etc.
    • Recommended reading for learning how to write better nonfiction:
  • Every Xenharmonic Wiki article should include...
    • An introductory paragraph or two that:
      • Is accessible to the Wiki's not-actually-officially-defined target audience of beginners: musicians with at least a basic introduction to music theory. This can be defined as first-semester, college Music Theory 101, but is also commonly introduced to high-school piano, guitar, and jazz musicians.
      • Provides links to beginner and intermediate-level articles on conventional or xenharmonic music theory as needed.
      • Clearly places the article's topic into the context of music.
      • Presents the purpose of the article in a way that will be understood by someone completely new to the article's concept, with links to articles about concepts that are necessary prerequisites.
      • Regardless of the topic (advanced or not), includes absolutely no math theory terminology beyond high school level, unless it is very, very commonly used in Xenharmonic music discussions, and links to/toward beginner-level articles are provided. If no such article exists, omit that terminology from the introduction, and present it later with a redlink to create that article. There are certainly also alternative ways to address the serious Xenharmonic Wiki problem of inaccessible articles that understandably frighten off musicians without a higher math degree. There are occasional paired articles, one for beginners (e.g. Mapping) and one for advanced readers (e.g. Temperament mapping matrices) — see list of beginner pages/Category:Beginner pages, list of expert pages/Category:Expert pages. This can be an effective approach but requires substantially more work.
    • Sections that divide the article into different depths of understanding, i.e. that require the reader to have less or more preexisting understandings. More advanced understandings belong in sections later in the article. This is true even for more advanced articles, because in effective narrative nonfiction writing there is always a progression of understanding. Some possible terms for the non-math/math sectional division (these can be mixed and matched): Elementary/Technical, Basic/Advanced, Fundamental/Detailed. Some great examples of presenting complex topics in several levels of understanding can be found the YouTube series 5 Levels, from Wired.
    • No list or table without an effective explanation of its contents.
    • It might be reasonable to use the Category:Todo tags to mark articles that need a plain-language introductory paragraph. However, there several possible Todo tags that might apply and perhaps should be merged: Todo:add introduction or Todo:intro or Todo:improve synopsis. Does Todo:intro mean something different from Todo:improve synopsis? See the discussion at Things to do § Plain-language writing.
    • Unfortunately, there are so many Xen Wiki articles that are missing an accessible introduction paragraph that it's hard to know how to begin such a monumental task. As part of a solution to this obstacle, I've put together an outline of specific articles as an "Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology" that I believe are foundational for people just starting out in xenharmonic music theory. These articles are a good target set for beginner accessibility and readability improvement.
    • Wiki sample/examples (to provide some idea of what kind of improvements would be helpful):
      • Consider the first paragraph of the "Porcupine family" article as of 2023-Sep-06, which never actually states what the "porcupine family" actually is (what's missing: it's a temperament family). This is not and uncommon problem: "The 5-limit parent comma for the porcupine family is 250/243, the maximal diesis or porcupine comma. Its monzo is [1 -5 3⟩, and flipping that yields ⟨⟨3 5 1]] for the wedgie. This tells us the generator is a minor whole tone, the 10/9 interval, and that three of these add up to a perfect fourth (4/3), with two more giving the minor sixth (8/5). In fact, (10/9)3 = 4/3 × 250/243, and (10/9)5 = 8/5 × (250/243)2. 3\22 is a very recommendable generator, and mos scales of 7, 8 and 15 notes make for some nice scale possibilities."
      • The version modified for clarity is: "The porcupine family is the rank-2 family of temperaments whose 5-limit parent comma is 250/243, also called the maximal diesis or porcupine comma.¶ Its monzo...."
  • Every Xenharmonic Wiki article about a specific tuning should ideally include an early section about the advantages (and probably disadvantages too) of that tuning for composing music. Contrast the article 19edo that includes that information, with the article 31edo that doesn't. You can find the missing 31edo info at an outside article, "Why 31-ET?" Of course when a tuning is newly developed people may not know any compositional advantages or disadvantages. But any tuning that has a fair bit of music written for it is ready to have that evaluative information added. This would greatly aid readers and especially composers who are curious where to start. An approach to addressing this wiki issue might be to use the tag Todo:explain its xenharmonic value to mark pages that need this info. See the discussion of Category & Template tags at Things to do § Plain-language writing.

Wiki Toolkit

All user sub-pages