User:Mousemambo/Workbench: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mousemambo (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
(77 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[User:Mousemambo|Mousemambo]]'s workbench for ideas and projects. Questions? Please use his [[User talk:Mousemambo|Talk page]] or contact him through XenHarmonic Alliance's [[Links#Discord server|Discord server]] #wiki channel.
[[User:Mousemambo|Mousemambo]]'s workbench for ideas and projects. Questions? Please use his [[User talk:Mousemambo|Talk page]] or contact him through XenHarmonic Alliance's [[Links#Discord server|Discord server]] #wiki channel (though he frequently takes weeks-long breaks from participating there).
 
== Created or substantially revised pages ==
 
* [[Scale design software]] (and redirect to it from [[Scale designer]]). A tangent from the "[[User:Mousemambo/Tuning methods|Tuning methods]]" page development project, extracted from the developing "Guide to Tuning a Software Synth in a DAW" page.


==Project ideas==
==Project ideas==
*[[User:Mousemambo/Tuning file]]. Add this new page. What are tuning files, what do they do, what are some formats? This will expand on the brief descriptions elsewhere, and link to the Anamark v2 page appropriately. Alternatively, create a [[User:Mousemambo/Tuning methods]] page with Tuning Files as one section, within which there might be some complete descriptions and others could have brief ones but links to a separate page with a more complete description. This might be a more future-proof approach. I need to think a little more before beginning. See below "[[User:Mousemambo/Workbench#Outline for a Tuning Methods page|Outline for a Tuning Methods Page]]" section for a sketch of what this might look like. I will note that there are excellent existing resources, like the [[Making Microtonal Music is Easier Than You’d Think]] page archived here from its original source. The problem with these is that they go out of date easily. Therefore, I am proposing a wiki solution that will be available for community maintenance including significant updates as appropriate.
*'''"Tuning methods" Project'''
*Add "See: Tuning file" (or See: Tuning methods) as appropriate in the articles that currently reference them.
**[[User:Mousemambo/Tuning methods]]. Add this new major page (or set of pages). I will note that there are excellent existing resources, like the [[Making Microtonal Music is Easier Than You’d Think]] page archived here from its original source. The problem with these is that they go out of date easily. Therefore, I am proposing a wiki solution that will be available for community maintenance including significant updates as appropriate.
*[[User:Mousemambo/Indian music]]. Replace the existing article "[[Indian]]" which, by the way, has a strange and dismaying page title (see below). Provide some history and current usage of tuning selections in the various branches of Indian music, and links to outside information.
**See the section "[[User:Mousemambo/Workbench#Practical tuning for beginners pages|Practical tuning for beginners pages]]" below for a list of what's currently available on the topic at this wiki and a few outside links.
*Add some "how to" information for people just beginning their journey, either as additions to existing pages or by creating new ones as appropriate. E.g. How to use tuning files, how to select which ones, how to get your electronic or software instrument to use one. These types of pages live in [[:Category:Guides|Category:Guides]].
**To better understand how the "Tuning methods" document would work with a(the) planned how-to guide(s), I have started one example how-to guide tentatively titled "[[User:Mousemambo/Document draft|Guide to Tuning a Software Synth in a DAW]]" using Surge XT and Reaper as (primary) examples.
*Category: Tuning mechanisms. Probably not that category name, but something that would encompass all articles about how electronic instruments are made to adhere to alternative (non-12-EDO) tunings. "Practical tuning" or "Tuning practices" or Tuning methods" or "Tuning technique" (currently in use but deprecated with redirect) or "Tuning practice" perhaps? I note that the current [[:Category:Tuning|Category:Tuning]] is about the theoretical side and not at all the practical side. However, it might instead be best to stick everything in there, practical and theoretical, although that's not the direction I currently lean toward.
** New article [[User:Mousemambo/Scala tuning system|Scala tuning system]]. It's currently a draft outline that needs to be filled in, in part with material from the significantly flawed, sometimes simply wrong, material in [[User:Mousemambo/Document 2 draft]]. Lots of work.
**Edit and move content from the stream-of-consciousness "[[User:Mousemambo/Document 2 draft|Tuning base, tuning center, and tonic]]" (Document 2 draft) user-space page into the [[User:Mousemambo/Scala tuning system|Scala tuning system]] article that's currently an outline.
**The existing "[[Anamark tuning file format]]" page should be replaced with a redirect to a "File format" section in a new "[[User:Mousemamster/Anamark tuning file|Anamark tuning file]]" page.
**Add "See: Tuning file" (or See: Tuning methods) as appropriate in the articles that currently reference them.
**Add some "how to" information for people just beginning their journey, either as additions to existing pages or by creating new ones as appropriate. E.g. How to use tuning files, how to select which ones, how to get your electronic or software instrument to use one. These types of pages live in [[:Category:Guides]].
**Category: Tuning methods. A category that would encompass all articles about how electronic instruments are made to adhere to alternative (non-12-EDO) tunings. "Practical tuning" or "Tuning practices" or Tuning mechanisms" or "Tuning technique" (currently in use but deprecated with redirect) or "Tuning practice" are alternatives perhaps? I note that the current [[:Category:Tuning]] is about the theoretical side and not at all the practical side. However, it might instead be best to stick everything in Tuning, practical and theoretical, although that's not the direction I currently lean toward. I'd rather see "Tuning methods" offered as a category on the Category:Tuning page, and hide all the "methods" pages in there.
*'''Indian music''' ([[User:Mousemambo/Indian music]]). Replace the existing article "[[Indian]]" which, by the way, has a strange and dismaying page title (see below). Provide some history and current usage of tuning selections in the various branches of Indian music, and links to outside information. See the "[[User:Mousemambo/Workbench#Indian music|Indian music]]" section below for a review of what this wiki already has on the topic.
*'''Scale naming'''. How are scales named? Are there existing conventions in the Xen community. Note a Discord discussion regarding square brackets used in scale names. Note the existing [[Temperament names]] page. Some related pages are:
**[[Notation]] (and [[:Category:Notation|Category:Notation]])
**[[Comparison of mode notation systems]]
**[[Temperament naming]]
**[[Scale naming]]
*'''[[User:Mousemambo/Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology|Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology]]'''. Near complete as of 2023-Sep-05. Might be worth moving to the wiki mainspace.
*Missing articles:
**'''Supermajor'''. Various ways the term is used, but focused on that term as a interval and chord name/category. Also, related names. Currently, it redirects to a specific usage: [[Ragismic_microtemperaments#Supermajor]]. See also: [[Extra-Diatonic Intervals]].
**Enneatonic. wtf?


==Practical Tuning for Beginners pages==
==Practical tuning for beginners pages==
Below is a list of existing pages (still expanding by search, as of August 2023) relevant to beginners who want to set their electronic instruments to other than 12-EDO tuning. Synth/sampler manuals frequently don't provide enough background information, instead assuming you already know something about tuning files.
Below is a list of '''existing Xen wiki pages''' (still expanding by search, as of August 2023) relevant to beginners who want to set their electronic instruments to other than 12-EDO tuning. Synth/sampler manuals frequently don't provide enough background information, instead assuming you already know something about tuning files.


It's useful to consider the trajectory of beginners newly arriving at the wiki. The wiki's [[Main Page|front page]] has a section "If you are new to musical tuning" that doesn't get into practical how-to issues, but the page also has a very appropriate and helpful section "Practical xenharmonics" ([[Useful Tools]], [[List of microtonal software plugins]], [[Microtonal instruments]]). "Useful tools" simply redirects to the "[[List of music software]]" page, which seems sensible if inconsistent.
It's useful to consider the trajectory of beginners newly arriving at the wiki. The wiki's [[Main Page|front page]] has a section "If you are new to musical tuning" that doesn't get into practical how-to issues, but the page also has a very appropriate and helpful section "Practical xenharmonics" ([[Useful Tools]], [[List of microtonal software plugins]], [[Microtonal instruments]]). "Useful tools" simply redirects to the "[[List of music software]]" page, which seems sensible if inconsistent.
Line 19: Line 38:
**[[:Category:Guides|Category:Guides]]
**[[:Category:Guides|Category:Guides]]
**[[:Category:Software|Category:Software]]
**[[:Category:Software|Category:Software]]
**[[:Category:Resources|Category:Resources]]
**[[:Category:Practice|Category:Practice]]
**[[:Category:Practice|Category:Practice]]
**[[:Category:Pedagogy|Category:Pedagogy]] (This is an odd word choice, and I believe that "Education" or "Learn" might be better. I note that [[User:Fredg999/Sandbox#Sidebar revision|Fredg999 is considering "Guides"]] instead, which I am liking more.)
**[[:Category:Pedagogy|Category:Pedagogy]] (This is an odd word choice, and I believe that "Education" or "Learn" might be better. I note that [[User:Fredg999/Sandbox#Sidebar revision|Fredg999 is considering "Guides"]] instead, which I am liking more.)
Line 24: Line 44:
*[[List of music software|'''List of music software''']]. Good page with ongoing maintenance activity. Linked to from the [[Main Page]] in the "Practical xenharmonics" section, as a "Useful tools" redirect. Also in the Navigation sidebar boath as "Software" under the Practice section, and as "Useful Tools" under the Theory section.
*[[List of music software|'''List of music software''']]. Good page with ongoing maintenance activity. Linked to from the [[Main Page]] in the "Practical xenharmonics" section, as a "Useful tools" redirect. Also in the Navigation sidebar boath as "Software" under the Practice section, and as "Useful Tools" under the Theory section.
*[[List of microtonal software plugins|'''List of microtonal software plugins''']]. Very important page at this time (August 2023), well maintained with updates. Linked to from the [[Main Page]] in the "[[Main Page#Practical xenharmonics|Practical xenharmonics]]" section. Also from the "[[List of music software#Software plugins .28VST etc..29|Software plugins]]" section of the "[[List of music software]]" page.
*[[List of microtonal software plugins|'''List of microtonal software plugins''']]. Very important page at this time (August 2023), well maintained with updates. Linked to from the [[Main Page]] in the "[[Main Page#Practical xenharmonics|Practical xenharmonics]]" section. Also from the "[[List of music software#Software plugins .28VST etc..29|Software plugins]]" section of the "[[List of music software]]" page.
*[[Pedagogy]]. Excellent page with a name that unfortunately doesn't scream, "New folks start here!" "Education" would be better because it's [https://www.ef.com/ca/english-resources/english-vocabulary/top-1000-words/ more common], or "Learn" is [https://www.summerboardingcourses.com/blogs/500-most-common-words-in-english/ even more common]. I note that [[User:Fredg999/Sandbox]]#Summary_of_proposed_changes notices the same problem, and implies that "Guides" would be a good choice -- I agree. An important page because there's a link to it in the wiki's default/Navigation sidebar. Understandably focused on tuning theory, not practical issues.
*[[DAWs]]. The section "[[DAWs#Approaches%20to%20Microtonal%20Composition%20in%20a%20DAW|Approaches to Microtonal Composition in a DAW]]" has some good info about practical tuning issues, though without enough detail to actually do it. Needs a link to some more practical how-to page.(s)
*[[Scala]]. Has a brief section on tuning files, which needs "See: Tuning files" added.
*[[Tuning system]].
*[[Pedagogy]]. Excellent page with a name that unfortunately doesn't scream, "New folks start here!" "Education" would be better because it's [https://www.ef.com/ca/english-resources/english-vocabulary/top-1000-words/ more common], or "Learn" is [https://www.summerboardingcourses.com/blogs/500-most-common-words-in-english/ even more common]. I note that [[User:Fredg999/Sandbox]]#Summary_of_proposed_changes notices the same problem, and implies that "Guides" would be a good choice -- I agree. An important page because there's a link to it in the wiki's default/Navigation sidebar. Understandably focused on tuning theory, not practical issues. Update 2023-08-05: The sidebar link has been renamed Guides.
*[[New Tuning Method]]. Relevant, but mostly outdated page whose last substantial update was June 2016, so no mention of MTS-ESP, MPE or tuner plugins.
*[[New Tuning Method]]. Relevant, but mostly outdated page whose last substantial update was June 2016, so no mention of MTS-ESP, MPE or tuner plugins.
*[[Creating Scala scl files for rank two temperaments]]. Beginners won't know what a "rank two temperament" is or what Scala does.
*[[Creating Scala scl files for rank two temperaments]]. Beginners won't know what a "rank two temperament" is (I personally have no idea) or what Scala does (I know what it does but haven't figured out how to use it yet). I don't understand this page at all yet, but I'm sure others do.
*[[Pedagogy questions]]. Old abandoned page.
*[[Pedagogy questions]]. Old abandoned page.
*[[PedagogyTradeoffs]]. Redirects to the "Pedagogy questions" page section: [[Pedagogy questions|When_is_learning_a_microtonal_system_of_pitches_harder_than_learning_the_12-equal_system.3F_When_is_it_easier.3F]]
*[[PedagogyTradeoffs]]. Redirects to the "Pedagogy questions" page section: [[Pedagogy questions|When_is_learning_a_microtonal_system_of_pitches_harder_than_learning_the_12-equal_system.3F_When_is_it_easier.3F]]
Line 32: Line 55:
*[[Useful Tools]]. Redirects to the [[List of music software]].
*[[Useful Tools]]. Redirects to the [[List of music software]].
*[[Anamark tuning file format]]. A good page already. Too bad there isn't an equivalent for Scala SCL/KBM file formats!
*[[Anamark tuning file format]]. A good page already. Too bad there isn't an equivalent for Scala SCL/KBM file formats!
*[[Scala]]. Has a brief section on tuning files, which needs "See: Tuning files" added.
*[[DAWs]]. The section "[[DAWs#Approaches%20to%20Microtonal%20Composition%20in%20a%20DAW|Approaches to Microtonal Composition in a DAW]]" has some good info about practical tuning issues.
Also, there are some not (yet) totally outdated pages out beyond the Xenharmonic wiki that are worth learning from:
Also, there are some not (yet) totally outdated pages out beyond the Xenharmonic wiki that are worth learning from:


* [https://producelikeapro.com/blog/getting-started-making-microtonal-music/ Making Microtonal Music is Easier Than You’d Think.].. also archived here as [[Making Microtonal Music is Easier Than You’d Think]]
*[https://producelikeapro.com/blog/getting-started-making-microtonal-music/ Making Microtonal Music is Easier Than You’d Think.], by Michael W. Dean. Also archived here as [[Making Microtonal Music is Easier Than You’d Think]].
* ... more to be added
*[https://www.midi.org/midi-articles/microtuning-and-alternative-intonation-systems Microtuning and Alternative Intonation Systems], by [[Jacky Ligon]]. MIDI.org (website), Sep 2020.
*CronoX 2 User Guide 1.02.sdw, Appendix A: Using TUN Files, by Jacky Ligon. 2003. ([https://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/Scala_TUN_Tutorial.pdf PDF])
*[[wikipedia:MIDI_tuning_standard|MIDI tuning standard]] Wikipedia.
*[https://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/scl_format.html Scala scale file (.SCL) format specification]. Huygens-Fokker Foundation (website)
*[https://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/help.htm#mappings Scala keyboard mapping file (.KBM) format specification]. Huygens-Fokker Foundation (website)
*[https://www.mizzan.de/anamark-format Anamark tuning file (.TUN) format]. Mizzen Microtonal Piano (website).
*... more to be added
 
== Indian music==
Existing pages addressing microtonality in various branches of Indian music (e.g. [[wikipedia:Hindustani_classical_music|Hindustani classical]], [[wikipedia:Semi-classical_music|Hindustani semi-classical]], [[wikipedia:Carnatic_music|Carnatic classical]], [[wikipedia:Sikh_music|Sikh]], [[wikipedia:Odissi_music|Odissi]], [[wikipedia:Filmi|filmi]], etc.):


== Outline for a Tuning Methods page ==
*[[Indian]]
Last updated 2023-Aug-02. Note that although much of the info will be in the Tuning Methods page itself, some other info might best be split out into its own page (e.g. there is already an [[Anamark tuning file format]] page). Also, any how-to [[:Category:Guides]] pages would be separate, and links could be provided to existing outside how-to instructions that have text or video format (urgh...link maintenance sucks).
*[[:Category:Indian|Category:Indian]]
*... to be further developed
There is some movement in the music world for moving away from referring to "Indian music" as a broad category, and toward instead referring to South Asian music. This is to distinguish the music primarily or entirely found within the country of India from (admittedly closely related) traditional/classical/artistic, folk, and contemporary music found in the South Asia region but outside India itself. I wouldn't say that movement is strong, but it has a point.


I'm inventing a distinction between "Tuning plugins" and "Retuners" even though tuning plugins have been understood as a subset of retuners. People are calling them "tuning plugins" and not using the term returners so this makes sense to me.
I note that under [[:Category:Traditions]] all the cultural traditions (not just Indian) are named with strange and somewhat dismaying names that omit the word "music" that should follow. E.g. Indian, Arabic and Greek should sensibly be Indian music, Arabic music, and Greek music. The words "Indian,"  "Arabic," and "Greek" by themselves can mean a people, a culture, or (except for Indian) a language. I believe that these page names and category names should specify "music" or "microtonality" or something else specific. Wikipedia (which this is not) follows [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:NOUN&redirect=no WP:Noun].


* Intro
== Xenharmonic music: An introduction to 21st century tuning systems ==
** Why? We need to tell electronic and software musical instruments what tuning system to use when they receive controller input or MIDI data.
This project has been moved to its own draft page, with the title "[[User:Mousemambo/Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology|Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology]]."
** How? Direct tuning info, or a tuning file sometimes with a mechanism to tell the instrument to use that tuning (and sometimes also how to use it).
* Direct tuning information. Some instruments have their own input system for tuning information, via dropdown menu selection or custom tuning settings. I don't like the expression "direct tuning" but can't think of something better right now.
** Kontakt "microtuning" built-in script. Because Kontakt is so important, this needs to be stated explicitly, and a how-to link provided.
** Other instruments (e.g. <list of example instruments>)
* Tuning files
** Intro. What are tuning files?
** Anamark (.TUN) tuning files
** Kontakt scripts
** Scala (.SCL/.KBM) tuning
*** Scala tuning files (.SCL)
*** Scala keyboard mapping files (.KBM)
* Retuners and tuning plugins
** Intro. What are retuners and tuning plugins? They take a tuning file as input (or direct tuning info), and appropriately modify the data going to an instrument.
** Tuning plugins (e.g. VST/AU inserted into a DAW or VST-host plugin chain ahead of a software or hardware-interface instrument)
*** MTS-ESP tuning
*** MIDI Polyphonic Expression (MPE) tuning
*** Pitch bend-based tuning
** Retuners. Software running standalone (independent from a DAW or plugin host), operating between a controller and software or hardware instrument.
*** alt-tuner
* Other tuning methods
** MIDI Tuning Specification (MTS)
** Other SysEx-based tuning methods?
* Deprecated and obsolete tuning methods
** RPN tuning


==Indian music==
== Intermediate xenharmonic music terminology ==
Existing pages addressing microtonality in Indian music:
This is a section in early development to collect terms that don't seem fundamental enough to include in the limited space of the "Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology" but I believe seem important enough to warrant inclusion in an intermediate-level follow-up. Some might instead get incorporated into the Introduction before its first non-draft release.


*[[Indian]]
The criterion for inclusion in the "introduction" — that the whole thing fit inside a one-semester academic class — doesn't hold as well here because you could make an intermediate terminology collection for each of several specialties, e.g. JI tunings, EDO tunings, [[RTT]], etc. But in the interest of continuing the idea of a survey of xenharmonic terminology, I'll eventually create sections for each specialty that seems to me at this time to be important for a survey of xenharmonic music theory areas of study, but for now this is just a hodgepodge.
*[[:Category:Indian|Category:Indian]]
 
*... to be further developed
* [[7-limit]]
I note that under [[:Category:Traditions|Category:Traditions]] all the cultural traditions (not just Indian) are named with strange and somewhat dismaying names that omit the word "music" that should follow. E.g. Indian, Arabic and Greek should sensibly be Indian music, Arabic music, and Greek music. The words "Indian,"  "Arabic," and "Greek" by themselves can mean a people, a culture, or (except for Indian) a language. These page names and category names should specify "music" or "microtonality" or something else specific. Otherwise they feel very much like they are exoticizing and generalizing traditional cultural musics, much like how 20th century academic Western music theory tends to treat all music outside those by dead Germans as somehow lesser.
* [[Chord]]
* [[Chord of nature]]
* [[Color notation]]
* Commas (Might better be presented as "Temperament families" with a list of important ones... Marvel, Porcupine, etc. and the commas they temper out.)
** [[64/63|Archytas' comma]] (aka 64/63)
** [[Magic comma]] (aka 3125/3072, small diesis)
** [[Ptolemisma]] (aka 100/99)
** [[49/48|Slendro diesis]] (aka 49/48, large septimal diesis)
* [[Comma pump]]
* [[Comma pump examples]]
* [[Comparison of mode notation systems]]
* [[Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic]]
* [[Distributional evenness]]
* [[Extended bra-ket notation]]
* [[Extended-diatonic interval names]]
* [[Extension and restriction]]
* [[Extra-Diatonic Intervals]]
* [[Gallery of just intervals]]
* [[Hexany]]
* [[Isoharmonic chord]]
* [[Just intonation subgroup]]
* [[List of superparticular intervals]]
* [[Nonoctave|Nonoctave scales]]
* [[Notation]]
* [[Pergen]]
* [[Scale index]]
**[[5edo]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:Equal temperament#Five-, seven-, and nine-tone temperaments in ethnomusicology|Equal temperament§Five-, seven-, and nine-tone temperaments in ethnomusicology]]
**[[22edo]]. Wikipedia: [[Wikipedia:22 equal temperament|22 equal temperament]].
**[[Mavila]]
**[[Superpyth]]
 
==Elements of good Xenharmonic Wiki article writing==
Here is an outline of some ideas about how to make the Xenharmonic Wiki more useful to musicians by improving the article quality.
 
*'''Introduction to good nonfiction writing (with an emphasis on exposition)'''
**Why are you writing?
**What is "good" in good nonfiction writing?
***Clarity of purpose: Strong focus on the idea being presented.
***Clarity of statement: Intelligibility in the contexts of reader and meaning.
***Clarity of structure: A nonfiction narrative arc.
**How to write an effective nonfiction paragraph or "paragraphic" section (a section functioning like a paragraph).
***Each paragraph presents one idea.
***Paragraphs include:
****Always, an initial statement of the idea.
****Optionally, the definition of a new term.
****Almost always, how the idea connects to previously presented ideas (provides context).
****Optionally, how the idea connects to related ideas outside this writing (provides context).
****Always, sentence(s) that develop(s) the idea.
****Always, sentence(s) that support(s) the idea.
****Always, an explanation of why the idea is valuable.
****Usually, a summary of what the paragraph has presented.
****Optionally, a description of how this idea connects to the next idea(s) to be presented.
***Edit your paragraphs to analyze what functions every sentence is providing (see above), simplify wording and phrasing, use natural speech, remove unhelpful redundancy, create powerful flow between paragraphs.
**What is an explanation and what are some types of explanation?
**Effective narrative structure in nonfiction writing.
**Tone in writing: Encyclopedic, authoritative, monographic, conversational, telegraphic, informal, comedic, etc.
**Recommended reading for learning how to write better nonfiction:
***[https://www.grammarly.com/blog/paragraph-structure/ Paragraph structure: How to write strong paragraphs]. Grammarly (blog).
***[https://www.grammarly.com/blog/paragraphs/ The ultimate guide to paragraphs]. Grammarly (blog).
***[https://www.grammarly.com/blog/body-paragraph/ How to write the perfect body paragraph]. Grammarly (blog)
***William Zinsser. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources?isbn=978-0060891541 On Writing Well].
***Peter Elbow. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources?isbn=978-0195120189 Writing With Power].


== Toolkit==
*'''Every Xenharmonic Wiki article should include...'''
*[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Conventions]]
**An introductory paragraph or two that:
*[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Article guidelines]]
***Is accessible to the Wiki's not-actually-officially-defined target audience of beginners: musicians with at least a basic introduction to music theory. This can be defined as first-semester, college Music Theory 101, but is also commonly introduced to high-school piano, guitar, and jazz musicians.
*[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Wikifuture]]
***Provides links to beginner and intermediate-level articles on conventional or xenharmonic music theory as needed.
*[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Things to do]] [also its [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do|Discussion page]]]
***Clearly places the article's topic into the context of music.
*[[:Category:Stubs|Category:Stubs]]
***Presents the purpose of the article in a way that will be understood by someone completely new to the article's concept, with links to articles about concepts that are necessary prerequisites.
*[[:Category:Todo]]
***Regardless of the topic (advanced or not), includes absolutely no math theory terminology beyond high school level, unless it is very, very commonly used in Xenharmonic music discussions, and links to/toward beginner-level articles are provided. If no such article exists, omit that terminology from the introduction, and present it later with a redlink to create that article. There are certainly also alternative ways to address the serious Xenharmonic Wiki problem of inaccessible articles that understandably frighten off musicians without a higher math degree. There are occasional paired articles, one for beginners (e.g. [[Mapping]]) and one for advanced readers (e.g. [[Temperament mapping matrices]]) — see [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Beginner|list of beginner pages]]/[[:Category:Beginner pages|Category:Beginner page]]<nowiki/>s, [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Expert|list of expert pages]]/[[:Category:Expert pages|Category:Expert pages]]. This can be an effective approach but requires substantially more work.
*[[:Category:Todo:expand|Category:Todo:expand]]
**Sections that divide the article into different depths of understanding, i.e. that require the reader to have less or more preexisting understandings. More advanced understandings belong in sections later in the article. This is true even for more advanced articles, because in effective narrative nonfiction writing there is always a progression of understanding. Some possible terms for the non-math/math sectional division (these can be mixed and matched): Elementary/Technical, Basic/Advanced, Fundamental/Detailed. Some great examples of presenting complex topics in several levels of understanding can be found the YouTube series [https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLibNZv5Zd0dyCoQ6f4pdXUFnpAIlKgm3N 5 Levels], from Wired.
*[[Special:RecentChanges]]
**No list or table without an effective explanation of its contents.
*[[Help:Editing]]
**It might be reasonable to use the [[:Category:Todo|Category:Todo]] tags to mark articles that need a plain-language introductory paragraph. However, there several possible Todo tags that might apply and perhaps should be merged: [[:Category:Todo:add introduction|Todo:add introduction]] or [[:Category:Todo:intro|Todo:intro]] or [[:Category:Todo:improve synopsis|Todo:improve synopsis]]. Does Todo:intro mean something different from Todo:improve synopsis? See the discussion at [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do#Plain-language writing|Things to do § Plain-language writing]].
*[[wikipedia:Category:Wikipedia_text_help|Category:Wikipedia text help]] (@Wikipedia)
**Unfortunately, there are so many Xen Wiki articles that are missing an accessible introduction paragraph that it's hard to know how to begin such a monumental task. As part of a solution to this obstacle, I've put together an outline of specific articles as an "[[User:Mousemambo/Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology|Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology]]" that I believe are foundational for people just starting out in xenharmonic music theory. These articles are a good target set for beginner accessibility and readability improvement.
*[[wikipedia:Help:Cheatsheet|Help:Cheatsheet]] (@Wikipedia)
**Wiki sample/examples (to provide some idea of what kind of improvements would be helpful):
*[https://en.xen.wiki/w/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&creationSort=1&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=50 Sysops]
***Consider the first paragraph of the "[[Porcupine family]]" article as of 2023-Sep-06, which never actually states what the "porcupine family" actually is (what's missing: it's a [[Temperament families and clans|temperament family]]). This is not and uncommon problem: "The [[5-limit]] parent [[comma]] for the '''porcupine family''' is [[250/243]], the maximal diesis or porcupine comma. Its [[monzo]] is [1 -5 3⟩, and flipping that yields ⟨⟨3 5 1]] for the [[wedgie]]. This tells us the [[generator]] is a minor whole tone, the [[10/9]] interval, and that three of these add up to a perfect fourth ([[4/3]]), with two more giving the minor sixth ([[8/5]]). In fact, (10/9)<sup>3</sup> = 4/3 × 250/243, and (10/9)<sup>5</sup> = 8/5 × (250/243)<sup>2</sup>. [[22edo|3\22]] is a very recommendable generator, and [[Mos scale|mos scales]] of 7, 8 and 15 notes make for some nice scale possibilities."
*... to be further developed
***The version modified for clarity is: "The porcupine family is the [[rank]]-2 [[Temperament families and clans|family of temperaments]] whose [[5-limit]] parent [[comma]] is [[250/243]], also called the maximal diesis or porcupine comma.¶ Its [[monzo]]...."
*'''Every Xenharmonic Wiki article about a specific tuning''' should ideally include an early section about the advantages (and probably disadvantages too) of that tuning for composing music. Contrast the article [[19edo]] that includes that information, with the article [[31edo]] that doesn't. You can find the missing 31edo info at an outside article, "[https://31et.com/page/why-31-et Why 31-ET?]" Of course when a tuning is newly developed people may not know any compositional advantages or disadvantages. But any tuning that has a fair bit of music written for it is ready to have that evaluative information added. This would greatly aid readers and especially composers who are curious where to start. An approach to addressing this wiki issue might be to use the tag [[:Category:Todo:explain its xenharmonic value|Todo:explain its xenharmonic value]] to mark pages that need this info. See the discussion of Category & Template tags at [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do#Plain-language writing|Things to do § Plain-language writing]].


== All user sub-pages ==
==Wiki Toolkit==
*General purpose development pages
**[[User:Mousemambo/Sandbox]]
**[[User:Mousemambo/Document draft template]]
***[[User:Mousemambo/Document draft]]
***[[User:Mousemambo/Document 2 draft]]
*This wiki's culture
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Conventions]]
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Article guidelines]]
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Wikifuture]]
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Things to do]] [also its [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Things to do|Discussion page]]]
*Useful category links and their corresponding template for tagging articles. To tag an article for category inclusion, add to its bottom after a blank line: <nowiki>[[category:todo:intro]]</nowiki> (for example).
**[[:Category:Stubs]] (generally use [[Template:Stub]] instead so that an infobox gets automatically added)
**[[:Category:Todo]]
***[[:Category:Todo:add introduction|Todo:add introduction]]
***[[:Category:Todo:improve synopsis|Todo:improve synopsis]] (improve intro)
***[[:Category:Todo:intro|Todo:intro]] (poorly defined category from early wiki days; do not use)
***[[:Category:Todo:explain its xenharmonic value|Todo:explain its xenharmonic value]] (as of 2023-Sep-07 the only articles with this tag are bios)
***[[:Category:Todo:expand|Todo:expand]]
***[[:Category:Todo:improve readability|Todo:improve readability]]
***[[:Category:Todo:simplify|Todo:simplify]]
**[[:Category:Inaccessible pages|Category:Inaccessible pages]] | Or preferably, use [[Template:Inaccessible]] which both adds an article to this category and also adds a gentle warning message box to the article's head.
**[[:Category:Beginner pages|Category:Beginner pages]]
**[[:Category:Expert pages|Category:Expert pages]]
*Wiki editing reminders
**[[Help:Editing]]
**[[Wikispaces Wikitext Reference]]
**[[wikipedia:Category:Wikipedia_text_help|Category:Wikipedia text help]] (@Wikipedia)
**[[wikipedia:Help:Cheatsheet|Help:Cheatsheet]] (@Wikipedia)
**[[Help:Template|Xen wiki Templates]]
***[[Template:Wikipedia]] | Use <code><nowiki>{{Wikipedia}}</nowiki></code> when the article titles exactly match, else<code><nowiki>{{Wikipedia|page title on Wikipedia}}</nowiki></code>
***[[Template:Beginner]]
***[[Template:Expert]]
***[[Template:Stub]]
***[[:Category:Hidden_categories]]
***[[:Category:Templates]]
***[[:Category:Message boxes|Message boxes]] | [[Template:Mbox]] (general-purpose message box)
***[[Special:UncategorizedTemplates|Uncategorized templates]]
***[[Special:UnusedTemplates|Unused templates]]
***Might be especially useful: [[Template:Mbox]], [[Template:Stub]], [[Template:Wikipedia]], [[Template:ScaleWorkshop]], [[Template:Todo]] (and see [[:Category:Todo]] for already defined ToDo tasks)
***[[Help:Disambiguation]]
****[[Template:Main]]
****[[Template:See also]]
****[[Template:About]]
****[[Template:Distinguish]]
****[[Template:Redirect-distinguish]]
****[[wikipedia:Help:Redirect|Help:REDIRECT]] (Wikipedia)
**Wikipedia link format. As a Xenharmonic Wiki link in the visual editor... Wikipedia:<articleName>
**Embedded image file (e.g. [[Help:Pictures]]). File:<filename> | E.g. <nowiki>[[File:The_Scale_Tree.png|alt=The Scale Tree.png|800x1023px|The Scale Tree.png]]</nowiki>
*Wiki health
**[[:Category:Xenharmonic Wiki]]
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:License]]
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Terms of Service]]
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Policy]] (orphaned)
**[[Xenharmonic Wiki:Conduct]] (orphaned)
**[https://www.facebook.com/groups/xenharmonic2/ Xenharmonic Alliance: Microtonal Music Forum] @ facebook
**[https://www.facebook.com/groups/xenwiki Xenwiki Work Group] @ facebook
**[[Special:RecentChanges]]
**[[Special:Log/newusers|User creation log]]
**[[Special:Log/move|Move log]]
**[[Special:Log/delete|Delete log]]
**[https://en.xen.wiki/w/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&creationSort=1&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=50 Sysops]


==All user sub-pages==
{{Special:Prefixindex|prefix=User:Mousemambo/|hideredirects=1|stripprefix=1}}
{{Special:Prefixindex|prefix=User:Mousemambo/|hideredirects=1|stripprefix=1}}

Latest revision as of 14:10, 20 March 2025

Mousemambo's workbench for ideas and projects. Questions? Please use his Talk page or contact him through XenHarmonic Alliance's Discord server #wiki channel (though he frequently takes weeks-long breaks from participating there).

Created or substantially revised pages

Project ideas

  • "Tuning methods" Project
    • User:Mousemambo/Tuning methods. Add this new major page (or set of pages). I will note that there are excellent existing resources, like the Making Microtonal Music is Easier Than You’d Think page archived here from its original source. The problem with these is that they go out of date easily. Therefore, I am proposing a wiki solution that will be available for community maintenance including significant updates as appropriate.
    • See the section "Practical tuning for beginners pages" below for a list of what's currently available on the topic at this wiki and a few outside links.
    • To better understand how the "Tuning methods" document would work with a(the) planned how-to guide(s), I have started one example how-to guide tentatively titled "Guide to Tuning a Software Synth in a DAW" using Surge XT and Reaper as (primary) examples.
    • New article Scala tuning system. It's currently a draft outline that needs to be filled in, in part with material from the significantly flawed, sometimes simply wrong, material in User:Mousemambo/Document 2 draft. Lots of work.
    • Edit and move content from the stream-of-consciousness "Tuning base, tuning center, and tonic" (Document 2 draft) user-space page into the Scala tuning system article that's currently an outline.
    • The existing "Anamark tuning file format" page should be replaced with a redirect to a "File format" section in a new "Anamark tuning file" page.
    • Add "See: Tuning file" (or See: Tuning methods) as appropriate in the articles that currently reference them.
    • Add some "how to" information for people just beginning their journey, either as additions to existing pages or by creating new ones as appropriate. E.g. How to use tuning files, how to select which ones, how to get your electronic or software instrument to use one. These types of pages live in Category:Guides.
    • Category: Tuning methods. A category that would encompass all articles about how electronic instruments are made to adhere to alternative (non-12-EDO) tunings. "Practical tuning" or "Tuning practices" or Tuning mechanisms" or "Tuning technique" (currently in use but deprecated with redirect) or "Tuning practice" are alternatives perhaps? I note that the current Category:Tuning is about the theoretical side and not at all the practical side. However, it might instead be best to stick everything in Tuning, practical and theoretical, although that's not the direction I currently lean toward. I'd rather see "Tuning methods" offered as a category on the Category:Tuning page, and hide all the "methods" pages in there.
  • Indian music (User:Mousemambo/Indian music). Replace the existing article "Indian" which, by the way, has a strange and dismaying page title (see below). Provide some history and current usage of tuning selections in the various branches of Indian music, and links to outside information. See the "Indian music" section below for a review of what this wiki already has on the topic.
  • Scale naming. How are scales named? Are there existing conventions in the Xen community. Note a Discord discussion regarding square brackets used in scale names. Note the existing Temperament names page. Some related pages are:
  • Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology. Near complete as of 2023-Sep-05. Might be worth moving to the wiki mainspace.
  • Missing articles:

Practical tuning for beginners pages

Below is a list of existing Xen wiki pages (still expanding by search, as of August 2023) relevant to beginners who want to set their electronic instruments to other than 12-EDO tuning. Synth/sampler manuals frequently don't provide enough background information, instead assuming you already know something about tuning files.

It's useful to consider the trajectory of beginners newly arriving at the wiki. The wiki's front page has a section "If you are new to musical tuning" that doesn't get into practical how-to issues, but the page also has a very appropriate and helpful section "Practical xenharmonics" (Useful Tools, List of microtonal software plugins, Microtonal instruments). "Useful tools" simply redirects to the "List of music software" page, which seems sensible if inconsistent.

Related to that visitor's initial likely trajectory, note that the wiki's main sidebar also includes a section "Practice" with links underneath to some essential starting points for people seeking practical tuning guidance, especially "Software" and (of less relevance to this work) "Pedagogy." Also in that sidebar, "Useful Tools" (redirects to List of music software) is listed under "Theory" which is odd unless you know how useful the "practice" tools are for better understanding theory.

Also, there are some not (yet) totally outdated pages out beyond the Xenharmonic wiki that are worth learning from:

Indian music

Existing pages addressing microtonality in various branches of Indian music (e.g. Hindustani classical, Hindustani semi-classical, Carnatic classical, Sikh, Odissi, filmi, etc.):

There is some movement in the music world for moving away from referring to "Indian music" as a broad category, and toward instead referring to South Asian music. This is to distinguish the music primarily or entirely found within the country of India from (admittedly closely related) traditional/classical/artistic, folk, and contemporary music found in the South Asia region but outside India itself. I wouldn't say that movement is strong, but it has a point.

I note that under Category:Traditions all the cultural traditions (not just Indian) are named with strange and somewhat dismaying names that omit the word "music" that should follow. E.g. Indian, Arabic and Greek should sensibly be Indian music, Arabic music, and Greek music. The words "Indian," "Arabic," and "Greek" by themselves can mean a people, a culture, or (except for Indian) a language. I believe that these page names and category names should specify "music" or "microtonality" or something else specific. Wikipedia (which this is not) follows WP:Noun.

Xenharmonic music: An introduction to 21st century tuning systems

This project has been moved to its own draft page, with the title "Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology."

Intermediate xenharmonic music terminology

This is a section in early development to collect terms that don't seem fundamental enough to include in the limited space of the "Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology" but I believe seem important enough to warrant inclusion in an intermediate-level follow-up. Some might instead get incorporated into the Introduction before its first non-draft release.

The criterion for inclusion in the "introduction" — that the whole thing fit inside a one-semester academic class — doesn't hold as well here because you could make an intermediate terminology collection for each of several specialties, e.g. JI tunings, EDO tunings, RTT, etc. But in the interest of continuing the idea of a survey of xenharmonic terminology, I'll eventually create sections for each specialty that seems to me at this time to be important for a survey of xenharmonic music theory areas of study, but for now this is just a hodgepodge.

Elements of good Xenharmonic Wiki article writing

Here is an outline of some ideas about how to make the Xenharmonic Wiki more useful to musicians by improving the article quality.

  • Introduction to good nonfiction writing (with an emphasis on exposition)
    • Why are you writing?
    • What is "good" in good nonfiction writing?
      • Clarity of purpose: Strong focus on the idea being presented.
      • Clarity of statement: Intelligibility in the contexts of reader and meaning.
      • Clarity of structure: A nonfiction narrative arc.
    • How to write an effective nonfiction paragraph or "paragraphic" section (a section functioning like a paragraph).
      • Each paragraph presents one idea.
      • Paragraphs include:
        • Always, an initial statement of the idea.
        • Optionally, the definition of a new term.
        • Almost always, how the idea connects to previously presented ideas (provides context).
        • Optionally, how the idea connects to related ideas outside this writing (provides context).
        • Always, sentence(s) that develop(s) the idea.
        • Always, sentence(s) that support(s) the idea.
        • Always, an explanation of why the idea is valuable.
        • Usually, a summary of what the paragraph has presented.
        • Optionally, a description of how this idea connects to the next idea(s) to be presented.
      • Edit your paragraphs to analyze what functions every sentence is providing (see above), simplify wording and phrasing, use natural speech, remove unhelpful redundancy, create powerful flow between paragraphs.
    • What is an explanation and what are some types of explanation?
    • Effective narrative structure in nonfiction writing.
    • Tone in writing: Encyclopedic, authoritative, monographic, conversational, telegraphic, informal, comedic, etc.
    • Recommended reading for learning how to write better nonfiction:
  • Every Xenharmonic Wiki article should include...
    • An introductory paragraph or two that:
      • Is accessible to the Wiki's not-actually-officially-defined target audience of beginners: musicians with at least a basic introduction to music theory. This can be defined as first-semester, college Music Theory 101, but is also commonly introduced to high-school piano, guitar, and jazz musicians.
      • Provides links to beginner and intermediate-level articles on conventional or xenharmonic music theory as needed.
      • Clearly places the article's topic into the context of music.
      • Presents the purpose of the article in a way that will be understood by someone completely new to the article's concept, with links to articles about concepts that are necessary prerequisites.
      • Regardless of the topic (advanced or not), includes absolutely no math theory terminology beyond high school level, unless it is very, very commonly used in Xenharmonic music discussions, and links to/toward beginner-level articles are provided. If no such article exists, omit that terminology from the introduction, and present it later with a redlink to create that article. There are certainly also alternative ways to address the serious Xenharmonic Wiki problem of inaccessible articles that understandably frighten off musicians without a higher math degree. There are occasional paired articles, one for beginners (e.g. Mapping) and one for advanced readers (e.g. Temperament mapping matrices) — see list of beginner pages/Category:Beginner pages, list of expert pages/Category:Expert pages. This can be an effective approach but requires substantially more work.
    • Sections that divide the article into different depths of understanding, i.e. that require the reader to have less or more preexisting understandings. More advanced understandings belong in sections later in the article. This is true even for more advanced articles, because in effective narrative nonfiction writing there is always a progression of understanding. Some possible terms for the non-math/math sectional division (these can be mixed and matched): Elementary/Technical, Basic/Advanced, Fundamental/Detailed. Some great examples of presenting complex topics in several levels of understanding can be found the YouTube series 5 Levels, from Wired.
    • No list or table without an effective explanation of its contents.
    • It might be reasonable to use the Category:Todo tags to mark articles that need a plain-language introductory paragraph. However, there several possible Todo tags that might apply and perhaps should be merged: Todo:add introduction or Todo:intro or Todo:improve synopsis. Does Todo:intro mean something different from Todo:improve synopsis? See the discussion at Things to do § Plain-language writing.
    • Unfortunately, there are so many Xen Wiki articles that are missing an accessible introduction paragraph that it's hard to know how to begin such a monumental task. As part of a solution to this obstacle, I've put together an outline of specific articles as an "Introduction to xenharmonic music terminology" that I believe are foundational for people just starting out in xenharmonic music theory. These articles are a good target set for beginner accessibility and readability improvement.
    • Wiki sample/examples (to provide some idea of what kind of improvements would be helpful):
      • Consider the first paragraph of the "Porcupine family" article as of 2023-Sep-06, which never actually states what the "porcupine family" actually is (what's missing: it's a temperament family). This is not and uncommon problem: "The 5-limit parent comma for the porcupine family is 250/243, the maximal diesis or porcupine comma. Its monzo is [1 -5 3⟩, and flipping that yields ⟨⟨3 5 1]] for the wedgie. This tells us the generator is a minor whole tone, the 10/9 interval, and that three of these add up to a perfect fourth (4/3), with two more giving the minor sixth (8/5). In fact, (10/9)3 = 4/3 × 250/243, and (10/9)5 = 8/5 × (250/243)2. 3\22 is a very recommendable generator, and mos scales of 7, 8 and 15 notes make for some nice scale possibilities."
      • The version modified for clarity is: "The porcupine family is the rank-2 family of temperaments whose 5-limit parent comma is 250/243, also called the maximal diesis or porcupine comma.¶ Its monzo...."
  • Every Xenharmonic Wiki article about a specific tuning should ideally include an early section about the advantages (and probably disadvantages too) of that tuning for composing music. Contrast the article 19edo that includes that information, with the article 31edo that doesn't. You can find the missing 31edo info at an outside article, "Why 31-ET?" Of course when a tuning is newly developed people may not know any compositional advantages or disadvantages. But any tuning that has a fair bit of music written for it is ready to have that evaluative information added. This would greatly aid readers and especially composers who are curious where to start. An approach to addressing this wiki issue might be to use the tag Todo:explain its xenharmonic value to mark pages that need this info. See the discussion of Category & Template tags at Things to do § Plain-language writing.

Wiki Toolkit

All user sub-pages