Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 305: Line 305:


:::: Sorry about the long string of comments... I hope you can get through them all, because I want to know your thoughts on the process I used and my reasoning for choosing 159edo over 205edo. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
:::: Sorry about the long string of comments... I hope you can get through them all, because I want to know your thoughts on the process I used and my reasoning for choosing 159edo over 205edo. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 03:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
== New Interval Categorizations ==
Continuing our discussion from [[Talk:5/4#"classic"_misleading|the 5/4 talk page]], do you think my proposal for new interval categorizations is at least half decent?  I mean, if "classic" is too ambiguous, we need to find better descriptors, for intervals like 5/4 don't we? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 16:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)