Survey of efficient temperaments by subgroup: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Line 42: Line 42:
Neither xenharmonicist can be objectively shown to be right or wrong. There is an amount of science to this, but there is also a lot of personal subjectivity.  
Neither xenharmonicist can be objectively shown to be right or wrong. There is an amount of science to this, but there is also a lot of personal subjectivity.  


And these are not the only possible stances, either! There is a Xenharmonicist C, Xenharmonist D, etc. Thousands of differing individual perspectives on what traits see important in a temperament.
And these are not the only possible stances, either! There is a Xenharmonicist C, Xenharmonicist D, etc. Thousands of differing individual perspectives on what traits see important in a temperament.


So how do you get your head around all these wide ranging perspectives?
So how do you get your head around all these wide ranging perspectives?