Keenanismic temperaments: Difference between revisions

Cleanup; update the links; start replacing POTE by CTE
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 37: Line 37:
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~35/24 = 651.1974, ~5/4 = 385.6847
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~35/24 = 651.1974, ~5/4 = 385.6847


{{Val list|legend=1| 22, 46, 68, 72, 118, 140, 212, 330, 470, 542d, 872cdd, 1012cdd, 1414ccddd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 22, 46, 68, 72, 118, 140, 212, 330, 470, 542d, 872cdd, 1012cdd, 1414ccddd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.7042 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 0.7042 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 52: Line 52:
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~16/11 = 651.1082, ~5/4 = 385.5778
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~16/11 = 651.1082, ~5/4 = 385.5778


{{Val list|legend=1| 22, 46, 68, 72, 118, 190, 212, 284, 330e, 402de }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 22, 46, 68, 72, 118, 190, 212, 284, 330e, 402de }}


[[Badness]]: 0.529 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 0.529 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 65: Line 65:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~16/11 = 651.2344, ~5/4 = 385.7289
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~16/11 = 651.2344, ~5/4 = 385.7289


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 22, 46, 68, 72, 118, 190g, 212g, 284g, 330eg, 402degg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 22, 46, 68, 72, 118, 190g, 212g, 284g, 330eg, 402degg }}


Badness: 0.340 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 0.340 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 82: Line 82:
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~11/10 = 165.8258, ~5/4 = 384.6711
Optimal tuning ([[CTE]]): ~11/10 = 165.8258, ~5/4 = 384.6711


{{Val list|legend=1| 15, 22, 37, 50, 65, 72, 159, 231, 253, 325c, 412cd, 484cd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 15, 22, 37, 50, 65, 72, 159, 231, 253, 325c, 412cd, 484cd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.732 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 0.732 × 10<sup>-3</sup>