User talk:Xenwolf: Difference between revisions

Line 279:

:::: Nevertheless, we do need feedback from others who did not participate in the development, and I'm hoping that my reasoning for the sheer number of accidentals- namely my need to see tuning changes in action- makes sense to these other people as well. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

:[...unindenting...]

Hey, Xenwolf, I just realized- the rastma, 243/242, is something akin to an 11-limit version of the syntonic comma... What's more striking is that a stack of three rastmas differs from a syntonic comma by 1771561/1771470, which has a value of only about 0.08893 cents... So, perhaps 243/242 is the interval that we need to consider as a JI basis for the single step of 159edo... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 07:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 279: / Line 279: @@
 :::: Nevertheless, we do need feedback from others who did not participate in the development, and I'm hoping that my reasoning for the sheer number of accidentals- namely my need to see tuning changes in action- makes sense to these other people as well. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
+:[...unindenting...]
+Hey, Xenwolf, I just realized- the rastma, 243/242, is something akin to an 11-limit version of the syntonic comma...  What's more striking is that a stack of three rastmas differs from a syntonic comma by 1771561/1771470, which has a value of only about 0.08893 cents...  So, perhaps 243/242 is the interval that we need to consider as a JI basis for the single step of 159edo... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 07:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)