Ploidacot: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m omega and diploid |
||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
The Greek letter omega, proposed by [[User:Godtone|Godtone]], is used for −1. ("Contra" has also been used in place of omega.) This simplifies the classification of certain temperaments, e.g. porcupine, which instead of beta-tricot can be omega-tricot, as splitting the interval 4/3 into three is arguably more intuitive than splitting the interval 6. This effectively shifts the possible values of shear to -1, 0, 1, …, {{nowrap|(''n'' − 2)}} if ''n'' ≥ 3. | The Greek letter omega, proposed by [[User:Godtone|Godtone]], is used for −1. ("Contra" has also been used in place of omega.) This simplifies the classification of certain temperaments, e.g. porcupine, which instead of beta-tricot can be omega-tricot, as splitting the interval 4/3 into three is arguably more intuitive than splitting the interval 6. This effectively shifts the possible values of shear to -1, 0, 1, …, {{nowrap|(''n'' − 2)}} if ''n'' ≥ 3. | ||
Note that omega should only be used with {{nowrap| ''n'' ≥ 3 }}. When {{nowrap| ''n'' {{=}} 1 }}, there is only monocot. When {{nowrap| ''n'' {{=}} 2 }}, alpha-dicot is preferred over omega-dicot. | Note that omega should only be used with {{nowrap| ''n'' ≥ 3 }}. When {{nowrap| ''n'' {{=}} 1 }}, there is only monocot. When {{nowrap| ''n'' {{=}} 2 }}, alpha-dicot is preferred over omega-dicot. Omega-based names are also not preferred when dealing with temperaments that split the octave, as they may be confusing - for instance, diploid alpha-tricot splits 4/3 in three while diploid beta-tricot splits 3/1 in three. | ||
=== No-twos or no-threes temperaments === | === No-twos or no-threes temperaments === | ||