243/242: Difference between revisions

TallKite (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 19: Line 19:
[[POTE tuning]]: ~11/9 = 350.5254, ~5/4 = 386.1653, ~7/4 = 968.6464
[[POTE tuning]]: ~11/9 = 350.5254, ~5/4 = 386.1653, ~7/4 = 968.6464


{{Val list|legend=1| 7d, 10, 14c, 17c, 24, 27e, 31, 41, 58, 72, 130, 202 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7d, 10, 14c, 17c, 24, 27e, 31, 41, 58, 72, 130, 202 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.05088 × 10<sup>-6</sup>
[[Badness]]: 0.05088 × 10<sup>-6</sup>
Line 36: Line 36:
[[POTE tuning]]: ~11/9 = 350.525
[[POTE tuning]]: ~11/9 = 350.525


{{Val list|legend=1| 7, 10, 17, 24, 65, 89, 202, 291, 380 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 7, 10, 17, 24, 65, 89, 202, 291, 380 }}


[[Tp tuning #T2 tuning|RMS error]]: 0.3021 cents
[[Tp tuning #T2 tuning|RMS error]]: 0.3021 cents