User:BudjarnLambeth/Bird’s eye view of rank-2 temperaments: Difference between revisions
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Neither xenharmonicist can be objectively shown to be right or wrong. There is an amount of science to this, but there is also a lot of personal subjectivity. | Neither xenharmonicist can be objectively shown to be right or wrong. There is an amount of science to this, but there is also a lot of personal subjectivity. | ||
And these are not the only possible stances, either! There is a Xenharmonicist C, Xenharmonist D, etc. Thousands of | And these are not the only possible stances, either! There is a Xenharmonicist C, Xenharmonist D, etc. Thousands of differing individual perspectives on what traits see important in a temperament. | ||
So how do you start working it out for yourself? Figuring out your own preferences? | So how do you start working it out for yourself? Figuring out your own preferences? | ||