User talk:FloraC: Difference between revisions

Line 174:

# Sure, this table doesn't scale well into edos as high as 103169. Switching to scientific notation would somewhat improve the readability, but such edos aren't of much use anyway. I wouldn't say it's an emergent problem.

# I don't like separating two rows for the steps. "Reduced" stuff has always been in parentheses and it's fine. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

:: See [[User:Xenwolf/Fifthspan #EDO information with fifthspans]] for examples. This way we include the patent val in one row and the octave reduced steps in the other. I find the values in parentheses confusing, also because of the vagueness of the caption. If we add fifth spans, it's a lot of numbers that can easily be mixed up. So I decided to use thicker borders in some places. Please have a look as to see if the version without parentheses is really that bad... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 174: / Line 174: @@
 # Sure, this table doesn't scale well into edos as high as 103169. Switching to scientific notation would somewhat improve the readability, but such edos aren't of much use anyway. I wouldn't say it's an emergent problem.
 # I don't like separating two rows for the steps. "Reduced" stuff has always been in parentheses and it's fine. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
+:: See [[User:Xenwolf/Fifthspan #EDO information with fifthspans]] for examples. This way we include the patent val in one row and the octave reduced steps in the other. I find the values in parentheses confusing, also because of the vagueness of the caption. If we add fifth spans, it's a lot of numbers that can easily be mixed up. So I decided to use thicker borders in some places. Please have a look as to see if the version without parentheses is really that bad... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)